Decision-Facilitating Information

  • Peter O. Christensen
  • Gerald A. Feltham
Part of the Springer Series in Accounting Scholarship book series (KLAS, volume 1)


An accounting system potentially reports information to decision makers. Consequently, to understand the economic role of accounting systems it is useful to understand the economic role of information systems. In our basic economic model of decision making, the decision maker faces uncertainty about the outcomes from his actions. We generally view information as a mechanism for reducing uncertainty, and in single-person decision making the reduction of outcome uncertainty has economic value (which may or may not exceed its costs) if it influences the decision maker’s action choices. Hence, the key characteristic of an information system is how the signals (information) it generates affect the decision maker’s beliefs about outcome relevant events.


Decision Maker Decision Rule Likelihood Function Risky Asset Perfect Information 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Amershi, A. H. (1988) “Blackwell Informativeness and Sufficient Statistics with Application to Financial Markets and Multiperson Agencies,” Economic Analysis of Information and Contracts, edited by G. A. Feltham, A. H. Amershi, and W. T. Ziemba. Boston: Kluwer Publishers, 25–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Blackwell, D. (1951) “Comparison of Experiments,” Proceedings of the Second Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability. Berkeley: University of California Press, 93–102.Google Scholar
  3. Blackwell, D. (1953) “Equivalent Comparison of Experiments,” Annals of Mathematical Statistics 24, 267–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blackwell, D., and M. A. Girshick. (1954) Theory of Games and Statistical Decisions. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
  5. DeGroot, M. H. (1970) Optimal Statistical Decisions. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  6. Demski, J. S. (1972) “Information Improvement Bounds,” Journal of Accounting Research 10, 58–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Demski, J. S., and G. A. Feltham. (1976) Cost Determination: A Conceptual Approach. Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Feltham, G. A. (1968) “The Value of Information,” The Accounting Review 43, 684–696.Google Scholar
  9. Feltham, G. A. (1972) Information Evaluation, Studies in Accounting Research”5. Sarasota, Florida: American Accounting Association.Google Scholar
  10. Feltham, G. A., and J. S. Demski. (1970) “The Use of Models in Information Evaluation,” The Accounting Review 45, 623–640.Google Scholar
  11. Gould, J. P. (1974) “Risk, Stochastic Preference, and the Value of Information,” Journal of Economic Theory 8, 64–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Huang, C. C., I. Vertinsky, and W. T. Ziemba. (1977) “Sharp Bounds on the Value of Perfect Information,” Operations Research 25, 128–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Marschak, J., and K. Miyasawa. (1968) “Economic Comparability of Information Systems,” International Economic Review 9, 137–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Raiffa, H., and R. Schlaifer. (1961) Applied Statistical Decision Theory. Boston: Graduate School of Business Administration, Harvard University.Google Scholar
  15. Ziemba, W. T., and J. E. Butterworth. (1975) “Bounds on the Value of Information in Uncertain Decision Problems,” Stochastics 1, 361–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter O. Christensen
    • 1
  • Gerald A. Feltham
    • 2
  1. 1.University of Southern Denmark-OdenseDenmark
  2. 2.The University of British ColumbiaCanada

Personalised recommendations