It has been reported that thoracotomy will be required in as many as 30% of cases presenting following penetrating chest injury and 15% after blunt chest trauma. There are, in general, three indications: shock/arrest with suspected correctable intrathoracic lesion; specific diagnosis’s (e.g. penetrating cardiac or blunt aortic injury) or evidence of ongoing thoracic hemorrhage. Outcome and management strategies depend upon mechanism of injury, degree of hemodynamic instability on presentation and associated extra-thoracic injuries.
KeywordsBlunt Trauma Blunt Chest Trauma Blunt Injury Combat Casualty Chest Tube Output
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Karmy-Jones R, Jurkovich G, Nathens AB, et al: Timing of Urgent Thoracotomy for Hemorrhage Following Trauma: A Multi-Center Study. Arch Surg 2001;136:513–518PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kish G, Kozloff L, Joseph WL, Adkins PC. Indications for early thoracotomy in the management Of chest trauma. Ann Thorac Surg 1976; 22(l):23–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Mansour MA, Moore EE, Moore FA, Read RR. Exigent postinjury thoracotomy analysis of blunt versus penetrating trauma. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1992; 175:97–101.PubMedGoogle Scholar
McNamara JJ, Messersmith JK, Dunn RA, Molot MD, Stremple JF. Thoracic injuries in combat casualties in Vietnam. Ann Thorac Surg 1970; 10(5):389–401.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robison PD, Harman PK, Trinkle JK, Grover FL. Management of penetrating lung injuries in civilian practice. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1988; 95(2): 184–90.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Webb W. Discussion In: Thoracic Injuries in Combat Casualties in Vietnam: McNamara JJ et al authors. Annals Thorac Surg 1970; 10:400.Google Scholar
© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2002