Liquid Ventilation

  • Matthew R. Rosengart

Abstract

The advent of conventional mechanical ventilation marked a milestone in the care of critically ill patients, enabling respiratory supplementation and improving survival for those infirmed from both medical and surgical illness. Subsequent investigation has enlightened us to the physiology and even pathophysiology of ventilatory support, facilitated the development of alternate modes of conventional ventilation, and identified those situations for which each is most suitable. Despite such advances, the pulmonary pathology of many patients necessitates support beyond which conventional mechanical ventilation can provide. Such situations are encountered in the preterm infant failing surfactant replacement for whom only ECMO offers any hope, and in the patient with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS). Furthermore, recent evidence suggests that traditional large tidal volume mechanical ventilation in patients with ARDS is detrimental and may contribute to the pulmonary dysfunction. Hence, newer modes of providing respiratory support are needed.

Keywords

Surfactant Dioxide Hydrocarbon Fluorine Pneumothorax 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Selected References

  1. Amato, M.B., et al., Effect of a protective-ventilation strategy on mortality in the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med, 1998. 338(6): p. 347–54.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Clark, L.C., Jr. and F. Gollan, Survival of mammals breathing organic liquids equilibrated with oxygen at atmospheric pressure. Science, 1966. 152(730): p. 1755–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cox, P.N., et al., Concealed air leak associated with large tidal volumes in partial liquid ventilation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 1997. 156(3 Pt 1): p. 992–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Croce, M.A., et al., Partial liquid ventilation decreases the inflammatory response in the alveolar environment of trauma patients. J Trauma, 1998. 45(2): p. 273–80; discussion 280–2.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Eisner, M.D., et al., Efficacy of low tidal volume ventilation in patients with different clinical risk factors for acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 2001.164(2): p. 231–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Ferreyra, G., et al., The relationship between gas delivery patterns and the lower inflection point of the pressure-volume curve during partial liquid ventilation. Chest, 2000.117(1): p. 191–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fuhrman, B.P., P.R. Paczan, and M. DeFrancisis, Perfluorocarbon-associated gas exchange. Crit Care Med, 1991.19(5): p. 712–22.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fujino, Y., et al., The effect of mode, inspiratory time, and positive end-expiratory pressure on partial liquid ventilation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 1999.159(4 Pt 1): p. 1087–95.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Gauger, P.G., et al., Partial liquid ventilation improves gas exchange and increases EELV in acute lung injury. J Appl Physiol, 1998. 84(5): p. 1566–72.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Greenspan, J.S., et al., Liquid ventilation of preterm baby. Lancet, 1989. 2(8671): p. 1095.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Greenspan, J.S., et al., Liquid ventilation of human preterm neonates. J Pediatr, 1990.117(1 Pt 1): p. 106–11.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hirschl, R.B., et al., Initial experience with partial liquid ventilation in adult patients with the acute respiratory distress syndrome. Jama, 1996. 275(5): p. 383–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Houmes, R.J., et al., Combining partial liquid ventilation with nitric oxide to improve gas exchange in acute lung injury. Intensive Care Med, 1997. 23(2): p. 163–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Houmes, R.J., et al., Hemodynamic effects of partial liquid ventilation with perfluorocarbon in acute lung injury. Intensive Care Med, 1995. 21(12): p. 966–72.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kirmse, M., et al., Positive end-expiratory pressure improves gas exchange and pulmonary mechanics during partial liquid ventilation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 1998.158(5 Pt 1): p. 1550–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Leach, C.L., et al., Partial liquid ventilation with perflubron in premature infants with severe respiratory distress syndrome. The LiquiVent Study Group. N Engl J Med, 1996. 335(11): p. 761–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lim, CM., et al., An optimal dose of perfluorocarbon for respiratory mechanics in partial liquid ventilation for dependent lung-dominant acute lung injury. Chest, 2000.117(1): p. 199–204.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ricard, J.D. and F. Lemaire, Liquid ventilation. Curr Opin Crit Care, 2001. 7(1): p. 8–14.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Tutuncu, A.S., et al., Dose-dependent improvement of gas exchange by intratracheal perflubron (perfluorooctylbromide) instillation in adult animals with acute respiratoryfailure. Adv Exp Med Biol, 1992. 317: p. 397–400.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Tutuncu, A.S., N.S. Faithfull, and B. Lachmann, Comparison of ventilatory support with intratracheal perfluorocarbon administration and conventional mechanical ventilation in animals with acute respiratory failure. Am Rev Respir Dis, 1993.148(3): p. 785–92.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Wiedemann, H.P., Partial liquid ventilation for acute respiratory distress syndrome. Clin Chest Med, 2000. 21(3): p. 543–54.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Weiswasser, J., M. Lueders, and C.J. Stolar, Pressure- versus volume-cycled ventilation in liquid-ventilated neonatal piglet lungs. J Pediatr Surg, 1998. 33(7): p. 1158–62.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Vails, I.S.A., F.J. Alvarez, and E. Gastiasoro, Liquid ventilation: from experimental use to clinical application. Biol Neonate, 2001. 80 Suppl 1: p. 29–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with traditional tidal volumes for acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. The Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network. N Engl J Med, 2000. 342(18): p. 1301–8.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Matthew R. Rosengart

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations