Advertisement

Reperfusion Injury

  • Timothy Pohlman
Chapter
  • 225 Downloads

Abstract

Though it is axiomatic that the most effective treatment for an ischemic organ or limb is early restoration of blood flow, it is also evident that ischemic tissue is not well adapted to the rapid return of oxygenated blood. Not all ischemic tissue is salvaged by reperfusion; cell death can increase or cell function deteriorates further in ischemic tissue during reperfusion. The adaptive mechanisms that are activated in response to ischemia have evolved, of course, when humans did not benefit from technologies that can immediately reestablish blood flow to tissue deprived of oxygen. For example, the compensatory mechanisms of hemorrhagic shock (in essence, whole-body or systemic ischemia) limit blood flow to many organs for hours, if not days. Arguably, physiologic mechanisms have evolved over eons only to protect humans during a gradual restoration of perfusion. Rapid restoration of blood flow, that is, reperfusion, is itself a relatively new environmental stress encountered by humans, for which no inherent physiologic responses have evolved. In contrast, modern treatments of infectious challenges with, for example, antibiotics and surgical debridement of infected tissue or drainage of abscesses are achieved in concert with highly evolved innate and adaptive immune responses in humans. Furthermore, reperfusion of ischemic tissue can induce dysfunction in non-ischemic organs remote from the site of ischemia. Thus the term reperfusion injury encompasses several pathologic states, which include local injury to ischemic tissue induced by reperfusion and systemic injury to non-ischemic tissue induced by reperfusion of ischemic tissue.

Keywords

Reperfusion Injury Hemorrhagic Shock Ischemic Precondition Ischemic Tissue Mononuclear Phagocyte 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Selected References:

  1. Boyle EM Jr., Pohlman TH, Cornejo CJ, Verrier ED: Ischemia-reperfusion injury. Ann Thorac Surg. 1997;64(4 suppl): S24–S30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Boyle EM Jr., Kovacich JC, Herbert CA, et al: J Thoracic Cardiovasc Surg 116:114–21,1998CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Carden DL, and Granger DN: Pathophysiology of ischaemia-reperfusion injury. J Pathol. 2000;190(3):255–66PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Carlos TM, and Harlan JM: Leukocyte-endothelial adhesion molecules. Blood. 1994;84(7):2068–101.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Cornejo CJ, Winn RK, Harlan JM: Anti-adhesion therapy. Adv Pharmacol. 1997;39:99–142.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Granger DN: Ischemia-reperfusion: mechanisms of microvascular dysfunction and the influence of risk factors for cardiovascular disease. Microcirculation. 1999;6(3): 167–78.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Morgan EN, Boyle EM Jr., Yun W, et al: Circulation. 100(19 Suppl):II365–8,1999Google Scholar
  8. Pohlman TH, and Harlan J: Adaptive responses of the endothelium to stress. J Surg Res. 2000;89(1):85–119.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Pohlman TH and Boyle EM Jr.: The Host Response to Injury and Infection. In: Critical Care, 3rd Edition; J.M. Civetta, R.W. Taylor, and R.R. Kirby, (eds.); JB Lippincott, Philadelphia, PA, 1997.Google Scholar
  10. Thiagarajan RR, Winn RK, Harlan JM: The role of leukocyte and endothelial adhesion molecules in ischemia-reperfusion injury. Thromb Haemost. 1997;78(l):310–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Winn RK, Ramamoorthy C, Vedder NB, et al: Leukocyte-endothelial cell interactions in ischemia-reperfusion injury. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1997;832:311–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Timothy Pohlman

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations