Abstract
The complexity and variability of the definitions given for the quality of care confuse physicians, patients and even specialists on this issue. Donabedian, a leader in the field of health care quality, has recognized that “several formulations are both possible and legitimate, depending on where we are located in the system of care and on what the nature and extent of our responsibilities are” (Donabedian, 1988). This wise view acknowledges that among professionals the types of interest in quality may vary. A conscientious physician in a busy practice may have a compelling interest in the quality of her or his daily interactions with patients, which is assessed essentially by immediate patient feedback. Similarly, nurses or other professionals want ongoing reassurance of the merits of their work. To such professionals, retrospective reviews months after the fact have secondary interest or importance. Their central focus is on the outcomes for particular patients, although the responses of groups have been of interest to professionals and have prompted many improvements in management.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Blumenthal, D. (1996). Quality of care—What is it? New England Journal of Medicine, 335, 892–894.
Donabedian, A. (1988). The quality of care: How can it be assessed? Journal of the American Medical Association, 260: 1743–1748.
Langram, P.L. (1994). Chaos theory and successful change management. Washington, DC: proceedings of the Seventh Annual National Conference on Federal Quality, 117–127.
Nelson, E.C. and Batalden, P.B. (1993). Patient based quality measurement systems. Quality Management in Health Care, 2, 18–30.
Panzer, R.J. (1994). Are hospitals quality improvement and public accountable? The Joint Commission Journal on Quality Improvement, 20, 396–401.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2003 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wan, T.T.H., Connell, A.M. (2003). Complexities that Health Care Oversight Must Take into Account. In: Monitoring the Quality of Health Care. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1097-0_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1097-0_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-5393-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-1097-0
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive