Abstract
The effect of focusing on a target word during the performance of a Japanese version of the reading span test (J- RST) was investigated. A focus word in RST was defined as the most important word with a core meaning necessary to integrate the sentence. Two kinds of RST were performed, one was focused RST in which the target word to be maintained was a focus word of the sentence. The other was a non-focused RST in which the target word was not a focus word of the sentence, although the sentence did contain a focus word. Script difference between kanji and kana was also examined; half of the target words were kanji nouns and the other half were kana nouns. RST score and total correct response higher for the focused RST than for non- focused RST. This result showed that focusing had an advantage in maintaining the target words and also accelerated the reader’s ability to integrate the sentence. A script difference was found only in non-focused RST and not in focused-RST, suggesting a strategic differences in the maintenance method between high span readers and low span readers. The word length effect is also discussed in relation to the focus effect.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Baddeley, A. D. (1986). Working memory. New York: Oxford University Press.
Carpenter, P. A., & Just, M. A. (1989). The role of working memory in language comprehension. In D. Klar, & K. Kotovsky (Eds.), Complex information processing: The impact of Herbert A. Simon (pp. 31–68). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Conrad, R., & Hull, A. J. (1964). Information, accoustic confusion and memory span. British Journal of Psychology, 55, 429–432.
Conway, A. R. A., & Engle, R. W. (1994). Working memory and retrieval: A resource-dependent inhibition model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 354–373.
Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 19, 450–466.
Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P. A. (1983). Individual differences in integrating information between and within sentences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 9, 561–583.
De Beni, R., Palladino, P., Pazzaglia, F., & Cornoldi, C. (1998). Increases in intrusion errors and working memory deficit of poor comprehenders. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 51A, 305–320.
Engle, R. W., Conway, A. R. A., Tuholski, S. W., & Shisler, R. J. (1995). A resource account of inhibition. Psychological Science, 6, 122–125.
Engle, R. W., Kane, M. J., & Tuholski, S. W. (1999). Individual differences in working memory capacity and whit they tell us controlled attention, general fluid intelligence, and functions of the prefrontal cortex. In A. Miyaka, & P. Shah (Eds.), Models of working memory: Mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control (pp. 102–134). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1992). A capacity theory of comprehension; Individual differences in working memory. Psychological Review, 99, 122–149.
Kintsch, W., & VanDijk, T. A. (1978). Toward a model of context comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 85, 363–394.
La Pointe, L. B., & Engle, R. W. (1990). Simple and complex word spans as measures of working memory capacity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 16, 1118–1133
Osaka, M, & Osaka, N. (1992). Language-independent working memory as measured by Japanese and English reading span tests. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 30, 287–289.
Osaka, M., & Osaka, N. (1994). Working memory capacity related to reading: Measurement with the Japanese version of reading span test. Japanese Journal of Psychology, 65, 339–345 (In Japanese with English summary).
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2002 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Osaka, M., Osaka, N. (2002). The Effect of Focusing on a Sentence in Japanese Reading Span Test. In: Witruk, E., Friederici, A.D., Lachmann, T. (eds) Basic Functions of Language, Reading and Reading Disability. Neuropsychology and Cognition, vol 20. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1011-6_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1011-6_10
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-5350-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-1011-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive