Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Sustainable Development and Emotions

  • Chapter
Psychology of Sustainable Development

Summary

To establish national and worldwide sustainable development, changes in individual behavior patterns and decision-making processes are necessary. We argue that environment-specific cognitions and emotions are decisive for sustainable behavior and environment endangering decisions. Data show that the influential cognitions and emotions do not represent a self centered, but rather a moral perspective. Cognitions like environment-specific control beliefs, ecological responsibility attributions, environmental justice appraisals and environment-specific moral emotions, such as indignation about insufficient sustainable political decision-making, are the most powerful predictors for sustainable behavior. Other emotional categories, for example, emotional affinity towards nature, have additional effects. In sum, the neglected emotional perspective on sustainable behavior needs to be included on the level of model building, as well as on the practical level of intervention programs. Corresponding guidelines are formulated at the end of the chapter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Abell, P. (1992). Is rational choice theory a rational choice of theory? In J.S. Coleman, & T. J. Fararo (Eds.), Rational choice theory: Advocacy and critique (pp. 183–206). Newbury Park: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen, I. (1991). The Theory of Planned Behavior. Some unresolved issues. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. New York: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arbuthnot, J. (1977). The roles of attitudinal and personality variables in the prediction of environmental behavior and knowledge. Environment and Behavior, 9, 217–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Auhagen, A.E., & Neuberger, K. (1994). Verantwortung gegeniiber der Umwelt: Eine Studie über umweltbewußtes Handeln [Environmental responsibility: A study on proenvironmental behavior]. Gruppendynamik, 26, 319–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bamberg, S., & Schmidt, P. (1993). Verkehrsmittelwahl-eine Anwendung der Theorie geplantes Verhalten [Mobility decisions — an application of the theory of planned behavior]. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 24, 25–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayertz, K. (Ed.). (1995). Verantwortung: Prinzip oder Problem? [Responsibility: principle or problem?]. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, R., & Kals, E. (1997). Verkehrsbezogene Entscheidungen und Urteile: Uber die Vorhersage von umwelt-und gesundheitsbezogenen Verbotsforderungen und Verkehrsmittelwahlen [Traffic-related decisions and judgments: About the prediction of environmental-and health-related prohibitive demands and mobility decisions]. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 28, 197–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, LJ., Seligman, C., Fazio, R.H., & Darley, J.M. (1981). Relating attitudes to residental energy use. Environment and Behavior, 13, 590–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkowitz, L., & Lutterman, K.G. (1968). The traditional socially responsible personality. Public Opinion Quarterly, 32, 169–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bierhoff, H.-W. (2000). Skala der sozialen Verantwortung nach Berkowitz und Daniels: Entwicklung und Validierung [Social responsibility scale according to Berkowitz and Daniels: Development and validation]. Diagnostica, 40, 18–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, L. R. (2001). State ofthe world 2001. New York: W.W. Norton & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burger, J.M. (1985). Desire for control and achievement-related behaviors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 1520–1533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calließ, J., & Lob, R.E. (1987). Handbuch Praxis der Umwelt-und Friedenserziehung [A handbook: Practice of environmental and peace education]. Düsseldorf: Schwann-Bagel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clayton, S. (1994). Appeals to justice in the environmental debate. Journal of Social Issues, 50, 13–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J.S., & Fararo, T.J. (Eds.). (1992). Rational choice theory: Advocacy and critique. Newbury Park: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Haan, G., & Kuckartz, U. (1996). Umweltbewusstsein. Denken und Handeln in Umweltkrisen [Environmental consciousness: Thinking and acting in environmental crisis]. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Devall, B. (1982). Ecological consciousness and ecological resisting: Guidelines for comprehension and research. Humboldt Journal of Social Relations, 9, 177–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeYoung, R. (1986). Some psychological aspects of recycling: The structure of conservation satisfactions. Environment and Behavior, 18, 435–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eckensberger, L.H., Breit, H., & Doring, T. (1999). Ethik und Barriere in umweltbezogenen Entscheidungen: Eine entwicklungspsychologische Perspektive. In V. Linneweber, & E. Kals (Eds.), Umweltgerechtes Handeln [Proenvironmental behavior] (pp. 165–189). Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Eigner, S., & Schmuck, P. (1998). Biographische Interviews mit Umwelt-und Naturschützern [Biographical interviews with environmentalists]. Umweltpsychologie, 2 (2), 42–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, G.W., & Jacobs, S.V. (1981). Air pollution and human behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 37, 95–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frijda, N. (1993). The place of appraisal in emotion. Special Issue: Appraisal and beyond: The issues of cognitive determinants of emotion. Cognition and Emotion, 7, 357–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gebhard, U. (1994). Kind und Natur [Child and nature]. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gigliotti, L.M. (1990). Environmental education: What went wrong? What can be done? Journal of Environmental Education, 22, 9–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162, 1243–1248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hazard, B.P. (1998). Zum Umgang mit Angst vor Gesundheitsrisiken durch schadigende Umwelteinflüsse. In E. Kals (Ed.), Umwelt und Gesundheit [Environment and health] (pp. 119–132). Weinheim: Psychologie Verlags Union.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henning, J.-H., & Six, B. (1980). Konventionelle Merkmalserfassung versus Differentielle Skalierung. [Conventional operationalization of traits versus differential scaling]. Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie, 2, 149–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodge, T. (1997). Toward a conceptual framework for assessing progress toward sustainability. Social Indicators Research, 40 (1–2), 5–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horwitz, W.A. (1994) Characteristics of environmental ethics: Environmental activists’ accounts. Ethics and Behavior, 4, 345–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huebner, R.B., & Lipsey, M.W. (1981). The relationship of three measures of locus of control to environmental activism. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 2, 45–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hummel, C.F., Levit, L., & Loomis, RJ. (1978). Perceptions of energy crisis. Who is blamed and how do citizens react to environment-lifestyle trade-offs? Environment and Behavior, 10, 37–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jildes, U. (1997). Nachhaltige Sprachverwirrung. Auf der Suche nach einer Theorie des Sustainable Development [Sustainable language confusion. Searching for a theory of sustainable development]. Politische Ökologie, 52, 26–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser, F.-G., Fuhrer, U., Weber, O., Ofner, T., & Bühler-Ilieva, E. (2001). Responsibility and ecological behaviour: a meta-analysis of the strength and the extent of a causal link. In A.E. Auhagen, & H.-W. Bierhoff (Eds.), Responsibility: The many faces of a social phenomenon (pp. 109–126). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser, F.-G., Ranney, M., Hartig, T., & Bowler, P.A. (1999). Ecological behavior, environmental attitude, and feelings of responsibility for the environment. European Psychologist, 4 (2), 59–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kals, E. (1996a). Verantwortliches Umweltverhalten [Responsible proenvironmental behavior]. Weinheim: Psychologie Verlags Union.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kals, E. (1996b). Are proenvironmental commitments motivated by health concerns or by perceived justice? In L. Montada & M. Lerner (Eds.), Current societal concerns about justice (pp. 231–258). New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kals, E. (2000). Gefühle, die unser umweltbezogenes Handeln steuern. In E. Kals, N. Platz, & R. Wimmer (Eds.), Emotionen in der Umweltdiskussion [Emotions in the environmental debate] (pp. 127–140). Wiesbaden: Deutscher Universitätsverlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kals, E., Maes, J., & Becker, R. (2001). The overestimated impact of selfinterest and the underestimated impact of justice motives. Trames, 5, 269–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kals, E., & Montada, L. (1994). Umweltschutz und die Verantwortung der Burger [Pollution control and the ecological responsibility of the citizens]. Zeitschrift fur Sozialpsychologie, 25, 326–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kals, E., & Russell, Y. (in press). Individual conceptions of justice and their potential for explaining proenvironmental commitments and behaviors. Social Justice Research. Special issue: Applying social justice research to environmental decision making.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kals, E., Schumacher, D., & Montada, L. (1999). Emotional affinity toward nature as a motivational basis to protect nature. Environment & Behavior, 31 (2), 178–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, R., & Kaplan, S. (1989). The experience of nature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kastenholz, H.G., Erdmann, K,-H., & Wolff, M. (Eds.). (1996). Nachhaltige Entwicklung. Zukunjtschancen fur Mensch und Umwelt [Sustainable development. Future chances for man and environment]. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keul, A. (1995). Stadt und Wohlbefinden — eine Synthese. In A. Keul (Ed.), Wohlbefinden in der Stadt [Wellbeing in the city] (pp. 232–248). Weinheim: Psychologie Verlags Union.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinnear, T.C., Taylor, J.R., & Ahmed, S.A. (1974). Ecologically concerned consumers: Who are they? Journal of Marketing, 38, 20–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirsch, I. (1985). Self-efficacy and expectancy: Old wine with new labels. Journal ofPersonality and Social Psychology, 49, 824–830.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krampen, G., Martini, M., & Ronco, C. (1996). Zur transnationalen Angemessenheit eines handlungstheoretischen Personlichkeitsmodells fur Analysen umweltbewussten Handelns [The transnational suitability of an action theory model of personality in the analysis of responsible environmental behavior]. Sociologus, 46 (2), 175–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreibich, R. (Ed.). (1996). Nachhaltige Entwicklung. Leitbild für die Zukunjt von Wirtschaft und Gesellschajt [Sustainable development. Guidelines for the future of economy and society]. Weinheim: Beltz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruse, L., & Arlt, R. (1984). Environment and behavior. An international and multidisciplinary bibliography. 1970–1981. München: Saur.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruse, L., & Schwarz, V. (1988). Environment and behavior. Part II. An international and multidisciplinary bibliography. 1982–1987. München: Saur.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langeheine, R., & Lehmann, J. (1986). Die Bedeutung der Erziehung für das Umweltbewußtsein [The impact of education on environmental consciousness]. Kiel: Institut fur die Pädagogik der Naturwissenschaften (IPN).

    Google Scholar 

  • Levenson, H. (1974). Activism and powerful others: Distinctions within the concept of internal-external control. Journal of Personality and Assessment, 38, 377–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linneweber, V. (1998). Nachhaltige Entwicklung als unscharfes Prädikat [Sustainable development as fuzzy set]. Umweltpsychologie, 2 (1), 66–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynne, G.E., & Rola, L.R. (1988). Improving attitude-behavior prediction models with economic variables: Farmer actions toward soil conservation. Journal ofSocial Psychology, 128, 19–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyons, E., & Breakwell, G. M. (1994). Factors predicting environmental concern and indifference in 13-to 16-year-olds. Environment and Behavior, 26, 223–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maes, J. (1995). To control and to be controlled — presentation of a two-waysquestionnaire for the assessment of beliefs in control. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 11, Supplement No. 1, 8–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maes, J. (1998). Existentielle Schuld und Verantwortung fur den Aufbau an ostdeutschen Hochschulen. In B. Reichle & M. Schmitt (Eds.), Verantwortung, Gerechtigke it und Moral (pp. 99–114) [Responsibility, justice and moral]. Weinheim: Juventa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maes, J. (2001). Solidarität — eine Frage der Persönlichkeit? Das Beispiel der Solidaritat Westdeutscher mit Ostdeutschen. In H.-W. Bierhoff & D. Fetchenhauer (Eds.), Solidarität, Konjlikt, Umwelt und Dritte Welt (pp. 293–320) [Solidarity, conflict, environment, and Third World]. Opladen: Leske & Budrich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maloney, M.P., & Ward, M.P. (1973). Ecology: Let’ s hear from people. An objective scale for the measurement of ecological attitudes and knowledge. American Psychologist, 28, 538–586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montada, L. (1989). Bildung der Gefühle [Education of emotions]. Zeitschrift fur Padagogik, 35, 293–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montada, L. (1998). Gerechtigkeitsmotiv und Eigeninteresse [Justice motive and self-interest]. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaften, 3, 413–430.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montada, L., & Kals, E. (1998). A theory of “willingness for continued responsible commitment”: Research examples from the fields of pollution control and health protection (Berichte aus der Arbeitsgruppe “Verantwortung, Gerechtigkeit, Moral” Nr. 114). Trier: Universität Trier, Fachbereich I — Psychologie.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montada, L., & Kals, E. (2000). Political implications of environmental psychology. International Journal of Psychology, 35 (2), 168–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Navarro, P.L., Simpson-Housley, P., & DeMan, A.F. (1987). Anxiety, locus of control, and appraisal of air pollution. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 64, 811–814.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nöldner, W. (1984). Psychologie und Umweltprobleme. Unveröffentlichte Dissertation [Psychology and environmental problems. Unpublished PhD thesis]. Regensburg: Universität Regensburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Opotow, S., & Clayton, S. (1994). Green justice: Conceptions of fairness and the natural world. Journal ofSocial Issues, 50 (3), 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pawlik, K. (1991). The psychology of global environmental change: Some basic data and an agenda for cooperative international research. International Journal of Psychology, 26, 547–563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Platt, J. (1973). Social traps. American Psychologist, 28, 641–651.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rohrmann, B. (1990). Partizipation und Protest. In L. Kruse, C.-F. Graumann, & E.-D. Lantermann (Eds.), Ökologische Psychologie [Ecological psychology] (pp. 645–653). Weinheim: Psychologie Verlags Union.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rotter, J.B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs, 80 (1, Whole No. 609).

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, Y. (2001). Intergenerationelle Verantwortlichkeit und Gerechtigkeit im globalen Umweltschutz. Unveröffentlichte Dissertation [Intergenerational responsibility and justice in global environmental protection. Unpublished Phd thesis]. Trier: Universität Trier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schahn, J. (1996). Die Erfassung und Veränderung des Umweltbewußtseins [Assessment and change of environmental consciousness]. Frankfurt a.M.: Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, L. (1988). Die ökologische Perspektive in der Verkehrspsychologie [The ecological perspective within traffic psychology]. Psychologie in Österreich, 8, 136–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumacher, D. (1996). Bindungen an die Natur und ökologische Verantwortung als Motive umweltrelevanten Verhaltens. Unveröffentlichte Diplomarbeit [Ties with nature and environmental responsibility as motives of environment-relevant behavior. Unpublished master thesis]. Trier: Universität Trier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seel, H.-J., Sichler, R., & Fischerlehner, B. (Hrsg.). (1993). Mensch — Natur [Man — nature]. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaver, K.G. (1985). The attribution of blame. Causality, responsibility, and blameworthiness. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheldon, K. & Schmuck, P. (2001). Suggestions for healthy goal striving. In P. Schmuck & K. Sheldon (Eds.), Life goals and well-being (pp. 216–230). Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherman, M.F., Perez, M.E., & Sherman, N.C. (1981). Motorists’ locus of control, behavioral intentions regarding gasoline conservation, and confidence in measures to promote it. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 52, 115–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sia, A.P., Hungerford, H.R., & Tomera, A.N. (1986). Selected predictors of responsible environmental behavior: An analysis. Journal of Environmental Education, 17, 31–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sivek, OJ., & Hungerford, H. (1989/90). Predictors of responsible behavior in members of three Wisconsin conservation organizations. Journal of Environmental Education, 21, 35–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stem, P.C., Dietz, T., & Kalof, L. (1993). Value orientations, gender, and environmental concern. Environment and Behavior, 25, 322–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Syme, G.J., Kals, E., Nancarrow, B.E., & Montada, L. (2000). Ecological risks and community perceptions of fairness and justice: A cross-cultural model. Risk Analysis, 20, 905–916.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, L.R. (1978). The environmentally concerned citizen. Environment and Behavior, 10, 389–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, T.R., Orwin, R., & Schurer, L. (1982). Defensive denial and high cost prosocial behavior. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 3, 267–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Umweltbundesamtg (Ed.). (1997). Daten zur Umwelt. Der Zustand der Umwelt in Deutschland [Environmental data: The state of the natural environment in Germany]. Berlin: Schmidt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Liere, K.D., & Dunlap, R.E. (1978). Moral norms and environmental behavior: An application of Schwartz’ norm-activation model of yard burning. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 8, 181–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WCED (World Commission on Environment and Development) (1990). Our Common Future. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wentworth, W.R. (1989). Energy conservation attitudes, intentions, and behaviors of homeowners in Staten Island, New York. Dissertation Abstracts International, 49, 3505–B.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Elisabeth Kals
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jürgen Maes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Technische Universitat Berlin, Berlin, Germany

    Peter Schmuck

  2. California State University, San Marcos, California, USA

    Wesley P. Schultz

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kals, E., Maes, J. (2002). Sustainable Development and Emotions. In: Schmuck, P., Schultz, W.P. (eds) Psychology of Sustainable Development. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0995-0_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0995-0_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-5342-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-0995-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation