Summary
Sustainable development will not be possible without a thorough analysis and revision of the gendered dimensions of international development. Gender bias is a universal phenomenon, but it is worse in poorer countries, where development efforts have often led to “underdevelopment”, e.g. increased poverty of the rural poor. In their desperation to survive, women bear more children and deplete more resources in their roles as food, water, and fuel providers. Hence environmental devastation has increased. The skills, values, and needs of women have been ignored because many development planners have too often used a Household Model that assumes male wage earners and female dependents. Men have left their family units for jobs outside their villages, and women’s needs, talents, and concerns about their local environments have been overlooked. The Household Model is in turn a logical outcome of psychological processes underlying sexism. Sexist language, media, attribution, science, and views of nature all contribute to an unconscious patriarchy that leads decision makers to visualize males as more important than females. Given our universal proclivities toward sexism, sustainable development agents must make clear and consistent efforts tofocus more resources on women if sustainable development is to be achieved. Fortunately, there are numerous examples of women-focused development projects that demonstrate successful ways to do so.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bacon, F. (1955). Preface of The great instauration. In Dick, H.G. (Ed.), Selected writings of Francis Bacon. New York: The Modern Library.
Boserup, E. (1970). Women’s role in economic development. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Chilcote, R. (1984). Theories of development and under-development. Boulder, CO.: Westview Press.
Crawford, M. & English, L. (1984). Generic versus specific inclusion of women in language: Effects on recall. Journal of Psycholinguistic research, 13, 373–381.
Dankelman, I. & Davidson, J. (1991) Land: women at the centre of the food crisis. Women and the environment: a reader. New York: Monthly Review Press.
Dankelman, I.& Davidson, J.(1988). Women and environment in the third world. London: Earthscan Publications Ltd.
Dayhoff, S.A. (1983). Sexist language and person perceptions: Evaluation of candidates from newspaper articles. Sex roles, 9, 543–555.
Durning, A.T. (1990). Ending poverty. In L. Brown (Ed.) State ofthe world, 1990. New York: W.W. Norton, p. 137.
Eagly, A.H. (2000). Social role theory of sex differences and similarities: A current appraisal. In T. Eckes and H. Trautner (Eds.) The developmental social psychology of gender (pp. 123–174). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Ekachai, S. (1991). Behind the smile: Voices of Thailand. Bangkok: Thai Development Support Committee.
Etaugh, C. & Brown B. (1975). Perceiving the causes of success and failures of male and female performers. Developmental Psychology, 11, 103.
Feather, N.T. & Simon, J.G. (1975). Reactions to male and female success and failure in sex-linked occupations: Impressions of personality, causal attributions and perceived likelihood of different consequences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 20–31.
Feldman-Summers, S. & Kiesler, J. (1974). Those who are number two try harder: The effects of sex on attributions of causality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 846–855.
Fisk, W.R. (1985). Responses to “neutral” pronoun presentations and the development of sex-biased responding. Developmental Psychology, 21 (3) 481–485.
Frank, A. (1966). The development of underdevelopment. Cited in Theories of development and under-development. Boulder, Co.: Westview Press.
Gahlot, D. (1993). A spare of hope for slum-dwellers. The Power to Change: women in the third world redefine their environment. 138–143. New Jersey: Zen Books Ltd.
Gastil, J. (1990). Generic pronouns and sexist language: The oxymoronic character of masculine generics. Sex roles, 23(11/12), 629–642.
Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development. Cambridge, Ma.: Harvard University Press.
Gilligan, C. (1986). Reply by Carol Gilligan. Moral Development 6, 325–333.
Glick, P., Fiske, S., Mladinic, A., Sais, J., Abrams, D. Masser, B., et. al. (2000). Beyond prejudice as simple antipathy: Hostile and benevolent sexism across cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 763–775.
Grube, J.W., Kleinhesselink, R.R. & Kearney, K.A. (1982). Male self-acceptance and attraction toward women. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 8, 107–112.
Hamilton, M.C. (1991). Masculine bias in the attribution of personhood: People=male, male=people. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 15, 393–402.
Harcourt, W. (1994). Negotiating positions in the sustainable development debate: Situating the feminist perspective. In W. Harcourt (Ed.) Feminist perspectives on sustainable development (pp. 11–25). London: Zed Books.
Harding, S. (1991). Whose science? whose knowledge? Ithaca, N.Y.: University of Cornell Press.
Hoddinott, J. (1991). Household economics and the economics of the household. Paper presented at the IFPRI/World Bank conference on Intra-household Resource Allocation, IFPRI, Washington, 12–14 February.
Hyde, J.S. (1984). Children’s understanding of sexist language. Developmental Psychology, 20(4), 597–706.
Hyma, B. & Nyamwange, P. (1993). Women’s role and participation in farm and community tree-growing activities in Kaimbu district, Kenya. Different places, different voices. New York: Routledge.
Jacobson, J. L. (1992). Gender bias: Roadblock to sustainable development. Worldwatch paper no. 110. Washington DC: Worldwatch Institute.
Jumani, U. (1993). Dealing with poverty: self-employment for poor rural women. New Delhi: Sage.
Kabeer, N. (1994). Reversed realities: Gender hierarchies in development thought. London: Verso.
Kalof, L., Dietz, T., & Stern, P.C. (2001). Race, gender, and environmentalism.
Keller, E. (1983). Women, science and popular mythology. In J. Rothschild (Ed.), Machina ex dea: feminist perspectives on technology. New York: Pergamon.
Masdit, K. (1991). Politics in Thailand with special reference to the role of women. Singapore: Times Academic Press.
Matlin, M. W. (1993). The psychology of women, 2 nd ed. Fort Worth, Tx: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Murphy, P. (1988). Sex typing the planet: Gaia imagery and the problems of subverting patriarchy. Environmental ethics, 10(2), 155–168.
Olsen, J.E. & Frieze, I.H. (1987). Income determinants for women in business. In A.H. Stromberg, L. Larwood, & B.A. Gutik (Eds.), Women and work. Newburypark, Ca: Sage.
Pettigrew, T.F. (1978). Three issues in ethnicity: Boundaries, deprivations, and perceptions. In J.M. Yinger & SJ. Cutler (Eds.), Major social issues: A multidisciplinary view. New York: Free Press.
Phongpaichit, P. (1982). From peasant girls to Bangkok masseuses: Women, work and development. Geneva: International Labour Office.
Puka, B. (1994) (Ed.). Moral development: A compendium. Vol. 6. New York: Garland.
Rodda, A. (1991). Women and the environment. New Jersey: Zen Books Ltd.
Schneider, J.W. & Hacker, S.L. (1973). Sex role imagery and use of the generic “man” in introductory texts: A case in the sociology of sociology. American Sociologist 8, 12–18.
Schwarz, N. & Kurz, E. (1989). What’s in a picture? The impact of faces on trait attributions. European Journal of Social Psychology, 19, 311–316.
Seager, J. (1994). Earth follies: Coming to feminist terms with the global environmental crisis. New York: Routledge.
Shiva, V. (1989). Staying alive: Women, ecology and development. London: Zed Books.
Shiva, V. (1991). The violence ofthe green revolution. New Jersey: Zen Books Ltd.
Sultan, M. (1992). Changing gender roles through credit: a case study of Grameen Bank. Conference paper prepared for Study Course 23, Women, Men and Development. Institute of Development Studies, Sussex.
Switzer, J.Y. (1990). The impact of generic word choices: An empirical investigation of age-and sex-related differences. Sex roles, 22(1/2), 69–82.
Thomas, D. (1990). Intra-household resource allocation: an inferential approach. Journal ofHuman Resources, 25, 635–64.
Waring, M. (1988). If women counted: A new feminist economics. New York: HarperCollins.
Wilson, E. & Ng, S.H. (1988). Sex bias in visual images evoked by generics: A New Zealand study. Sex roles, 18, 159–168.
Winter, D.O. (1996). Ecological psychology: Healing the split between planet and self. New York: HarperCollins Text.
Zelezny, L., Chua P.P, & Aldrich, C. (2000). Elaborating on gender differences in environmentalism Journal of Social Issues, 56, 443–45.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2002 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Du Nann Winter, D. (2002). (En)Gendering Sustainable Development. In: Schmuck, P., Schultz, W.P. (eds) Psychology of Sustainable Development. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0995-0_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0995-0_5
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-5342-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-0995-0
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive