Climate Scenario Construction for Midwest Analysis

  • Jane Southworth


Our modeling efforts used VEMAP data (and NOAA data for calibration), and the HadCM2 General Circulation Model (GCM) data for two scenarios: one for the greenhouse gas only run, and one for a greenhouse gas and sulfate run. The study area for this analysis is shown in Figure 1, with the approximate location of our representative farm sites shown. These farm locations represent the area for which the modeling was done. Following is a detailed discussion of all the climate data used in this study.


Future Climate General Circulation Model Climate Scenario Future Climate Scenario Weather Generator 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Adams, R.M., C. Rosenzweig, R.M. Peart, J.T. Ritchie, B.A. McCarl, J.D. Glyer, R.B. Curry, J.W. Jones, K.J. Boote, and L.H. Allen Jr., 1990. Global climate change and U.S. agriculture. Nature, 345:219–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Carnell, R.E. and C.A., Senior, 1998. Changes in mid-latitude variability due to increasing greenhouse gases and sulphate aerosols. Climate Dynamics, 14:369–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Hoogenboom G., G.Y. Tsuji, N.B. Pickering, R.B. Curry, J.W. Jones, U. Singh, and D.C. Godwin, 1995. Decision support system to study climate change impacts on crop production. Pp: 51–75. In: Climate Change and Agriculture: Analysis of Potential International Impacts. ASA Special Publication No. 59. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, Wise., USA.Google Scholar
  4. IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change), 2001. Climate change 2001: The scientific basis. In: Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, ed. J.T. Houghton, Y. Ding, D.J. Griggs, M. Noguer, P.J. van der Linden, X. Dai, K. Maskell, and C.A. Johnson, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.Google Scholar
  5. -, 1995. Second Assessment Report B Climate Change:. The Science of Climate Change, ed. J.T. Houghton, L.G. Meira Filho, B.A. Callender, N. Harris, A. Kattenburg, K. Maskell, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.Google Scholar
  6. Johns, T.C., R.E. Carnell, J.F. Crossley, J.M. Gregory, J.F.B. Mitchell, C.A. Senior, S.F.B. Tett, and R.A. Wood, 1997. The second Hadley Center coupled ocean-atmosphere GCM: Model description, spinup and validation. Climate Dynamics, 13:103–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Johnson, G.L., C.L., Hanson, and E.B., Ballard, 1996. Stochastic weather simulation: Overview and analysis of two commonly used models. Journal of Applied Meteorology, 35:1878–1896.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kittel, T.G.F, N.A. Rosenbloom, T.H. Painter, D.S. Schimel, H.H. Fisher, A. Grimsdell, VEMAP Participants, C. Daly, and E.R. Hunt Jr., 1996. VEMAP Phase I Database: An Integrated Input Dataset for Ecosystem and Vegetation Modeling for the Conterminous United States. ORNL Distributed Active Archive Center, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tenn., USA. CD-ROM and URL Scholar
  9. Liang, X., W. Wang, and M.P. Dudek, 1995. Interannual variability of regional climate and its change due to the greenhouse effect. Global and Planetary Change, 10:217–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Mavromatis, T. and P.D. Jones, 1998. Comparison of climate change scenario construction methodologies for impact assessment studies. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 91:51–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Mearns, L.O., 1995. Research issues in determining the effects of changing climate variability on crop yields. Pp: 123–146. In Climate Change and Agriculture: Analysis of Potential International Impacts, ed. C Rosenzweig. ASA Special Publication No. 59. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, Wisc., USA.Google Scholar
  12. Mearns, L.O., R.W. Katz, and S.H. Schneider, 1984. Extreme high-temperature events: Changes in their probabilities with changes in mean temperature. Journal of Climate and Applied Meteorology, 23:1601–1613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Mearns, L.O., C. Rosenzweig, and R. Goldberg, 1997. Mean and variance change in climate scenarios: Methods, agricultural applications, and measures of uncertainty. Climatic Change, 35:367–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. -, 1996. The effect of changes in daily and inter-annual climatic variability on CERES-Wheat: A sensitivity study. Climatic Change, 32:257–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Mitchell, J.F.B., T.C. Johns, J.M. Gregory, and S.F.B. Tett, 1995. Climate response to increasing levels of greenhouse gases and sulphate aerosols. Nature, 376:501–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Rind, D., 1991. Climate variability and climate change. Pp. 69–78. In Greenhouse-Gas-Induced Climate Change: A Critical Appraisal of Simulations and Observations, ed. M.E. Schlesinger. Vol. 19, Development in Atmospheric Science series, Elsevier, New York, N.Y., USA.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jane Southworth
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Public and Environmental AffairsIndiana UniversityBloomingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations