The Evolution and Structure of Industrial Clusters in Japan

  • Hideki Yamawaki

Abstract

This paper focuses on two aspects of the evolution and structure of clusters in Japan, namely, what gives rise to clusters and what benefits are acquired by small firms from participating in clusters. The determinants of clustering are discussed by way of a review of the history of 14 industrial clusters which cover a wide range of industries and locations in Japan. It is noted that different factors dominate in different cases. Among the more important ones are the existence of leading large firms, the availability of a pooled labor market, and the presence of public research and testing facilities. The four most important benefits from clusters reported by small firms are: (i) specialization; (ii) ease of procurement; (iii) diffusion of technology, and (iv) public policy support. Access to skilled workers is not reported to be a significant benefit. This may be explained by the fact that the dominant source of skills acquisition among Japanese workers is on-the-job training and such skills may be too firm-specific to be useful to others, even within a geographically concentrated cluster.

Keywords

Clay Europe Transportation Diesel Nylon 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Asanuma, B. and T. Kikutani, 1992, ‘Risk Absorption in Japanese Subcontracting: A Microeconometric Study of the Automobile Industry’, Journal of the Japanese and International Economies 6 (March), 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Audretsch, D. B., 1999, ‘The Economic Role of Small- and Medium-Sized Enterprises: The United States’, paper prepared for the World Bank Workshop on Small and Medium Enterprises, August 13–14, 1999. World Bank, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  3. Audretsch, D. B. and M. P. Feldman, 1996, ‘R&D Spillovers and the Geography of Innovation and Production’, American Economic Review 86 (June), 630–640.Google Scholar
  4. Head, K., J. Ries and D. Swenson, 1995, ‘Agglomeration Benefits and Location Choice: Evidence from Japanese Manufacturing Investments in the United States’, Journal of International Economics 38 (May), 223–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ito, M. and S. Urata. 1997, ‘Chushokigyo to hushokigyo enjoseisaku (1): 3 sanchi no hikaku chosa (Small and Medium Enterprises and Policy Toward Them)’, Keizaigaku Ronshu 63(10), 1–20.Google Scholar
  6. Ito, M. and S. Urata, 1998, ‘Chushokigyo to hushokigyo enjoseisaku (2): 3 sanchi no hikaku chosa (Small and Medium Enterprises and Policy Toward Them)’, Keizaigaku Ronshu 64(4), 49–73.Google Scholar
  7. Jaffe, A., M. Trajtenberg and R. Henderson, 1993, ‘Geographic Localization of Knowledge Spillovers as Evidence by Patent Citations’, Quarterly Journal of Economics 63, 577–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. JICA, 1992, Nihonno jibasangyo shinkoseisaku kenkyu (Research on Japan’s Policy Toward Regional Clusters), Tokyo: Japan International Cooperation Agency.Google Scholar
  9. Koike, K., 1988, Understanding Industrial Relations in Modern Japan, New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  10. Krugman, P., 1991, Geography and Trade, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  11. Marshall, A., 1920, Principles of Economics, New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  12. MITI, 1996, ‘Sangyo shuseki fudoki (Industrial Localization)’, An interim report. Ministry of International Trade and Industry, Tokyo.Google Scholar
  13. Mishina, K., 1993, ‘Tombow Pencil Co., Ltd.’, Harvard Business School Case, 9–692–011. Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
  14. Morikawa, M., 1997, ‘Machinery Industry and Regional Economic Growth: Factors in the Economic Development of Japan’s Prefectures’, Tsusankenkyu Review 10 (December), 64–90. [In Japanese.]Google Scholar
  15. Odagiri, H., 1992, Growth Through Competition, Competition Through Growth: Strategic Management and the Economy in Japan, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. People’s Finance Corporation, 1987, Endaka de yureru jibasangyo (Regional Clusters Under the Appreciation of Yen), Tokyo: Small and Medium Enterprise Research Center.Google Scholar
  17. People’s Finance Corporation, 1995, Tenki wo mukaeta chiikikeizai: kawaru jibasangyo no yakuwari (Regional Economies Under Transition: Changing Roles of Regional Clusters), Tokyo: Small and Medium Enterprise Research Center.Google Scholar
  18. Porter, M., 1998, ‘Clusters and the New Economics of Competition’, Harvard Business Review 76 (November-December), 77–90.Google Scholar
  19. Porter, M., 1990, The Competitive Advantage of Nations, New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  20. SMEA, 1997, Zenkoku no sanchi: heisei 8 nendo sanchi gaikyochosa kekka (Japan’s Industrial Clusters: The 1996 Survey Result), Tokyo: Small and Medium Enterprise Agency.Google Scholar
  21. Uekusa, M., 1987, ‘Industrial Organization’, in K. Yamamura and Y. Yasuba (eds.), The Political Economy of Japan, Vol. 1: The Domestic Transformation, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Yamawaki, H., 1992, ‘International Competition and Japan’s Domestic Adjustments’, in K. Anderson (ed.), New Silk Roads: East Asia and World Textile Markets, Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hideki Yamawaki
    • 1
  1. 1.The Peter F. Drucker Graduate School of ManagementClaremont Graduate UniversityClaremontUSA

Personalised recommendations