Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Dynamic Role of Small Firms: Evidence from the U.S.

  • Chapter
Small Firm Dynamism in East Asia

Abstract

This paper provides a conceptual and empirical account of the dynamic role of SMEs in the U.S. economy. Evidence is provided to show that SMEs are important sources of employment growth and innovation. For example, the net employment gain during 1990–95 is shown to be greater among smaller firms than among larger firms. Furthermore, while large firms often produce a larger number of patents per firm, the patenting rate for small firms is typically higher than that for large firms when measured on a per-employee basis. It is noted that public policy is shifting away from traditional measures which were based on a static conception of industrial organization and thus emphasized anti-trust, regulation and public ownership solutions, towards measures which are geared towards supporting the dynamic role of SMEs. These measures focus on providing an enabling environment for enterprise start-ups, job creation, knowledge spillovers and technological change.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Acs, Zoltan J. and Catherine Armington, 1998, ‘Longitudinal Establishment and Enterprise Microdata (LEEM) Documentation’, Center for Economic Studies, U.S. Department of Commerce, Discussion Paper, 98–9 July 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Acs, Zoltan J., Catherine Armington and Alicia Robb, 1999, ‘Measures of Job Flow Dynamics in the U.S.’, Center for Economic Studies, U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington DC, Discussion Paper 99–1 January 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Acs, Z. J. and David B. Audretsch, 1987, ‘Innovation, Market Structure and Firm Size’, Review of Economics and Statistics 69(4), 567–575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acs, Z. J. and David B. Audretsch, 1990, Innovation and Small Firms, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Acs, Z. J. and David B. Audretsch, 1993, Small Firms and Entrepreneur ship: An East-West Perspective, Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Acs, Z. J. and David B. Audretsch, 1998, ‘Innovation in Large and Small Firms: An Empirical Analysis’, American Economic Review 78(4), 678–690.

    Google Scholar 

  • Acs, Z. J., David B. Audretsch and Maryann P. Feldman, 1992, ‘Real Effects of Academic Research’, American Economic Review 82(1), 363–367.

    Google Scholar 

  • Almeida, P. and B. Kogut, 1997, ‘The Exploration of Technological Diversity and the Geographic Localization of Innovation’, Small Business Economics 9(1), 21–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, Kenneth J., 1962, ‘Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention’, in R. R. Nelson (ed.), The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, David B., 1991, ‘New Firm Survival and the Technological Regime’, Review of Economics and Statistics 73(3), 441–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, David B., 1995, Innovation and Industry Evolution, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, David B. and Maryann P. Feldman, 1996, ‘R&D Spillovers and the Geography of Innovation and Production’, American Economic Review 86(3), 630–640.

    Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, David B. and Talat Mahmood, 1995, ‘New-Firm Survival: New Results Using a Hazard Function’, Review of Economics and Statistics 77(1), 97–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, David B. and Paula E. Stephan, 1996, ‘Company-Scientist Locational Links: The Case of Biotechnology’, American Economic Review 86(3), 641–652.

    Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, David B. and Hideki Yamawaki (eds.), 1991, Structure, Conduct and Performance: Leonard Weiss, New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baily, Martin Neil, Eric J. Bartelsman and John Haltiwanger, 1996, ‘Downsizing and Productivity Growth: Myth or Reality?’ Small Business Economics 8(4), 259–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, John R., 1995, The Dynamics of Industrial Competition, Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, John R. and Paul K. Gorecki, 1991, ‘Entry, Exit, and Production Growth’, Iin P. Geroski and J. Schwalbach (eds.), Entry and Market Contestability: An International Comparison, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, John R. and M. Rafiquzzaman, 1995, ‘Selection Versus Evolutionary Adaptation: Learning and Post-Entry Performance’, International Journal of Industrial Organization 13(4), 501–523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, W. L. and J. T. Scott, 1987, Market Structure and Technological Change, New York: Harwood.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, Charles, James Hamilton and James Medoff, 1990, Employers Large and Small, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caves, Richard E., 1998, ‘Industrial Organization and New Findings on the Turnover and Mobility of Firms’, Journal of Economic Literature 36(4), 1947–1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coase, R. H., 1937, ‘The Nature of the Firm’, Economica 4(4), 386–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, W. M. and S. Klepper, 1991, ‘Firm Size Versus Diversity in the Achievement of Technological Advance’, in Z. J. Acs and D. B. Audretsch (eds.), Innovation and Technological Change: An International Comparison, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, W. M. and S. Klepper, 1992, ‘The Tradeoff Between Firm Size and Diversity in the Pursuit of Technological Progress’, Small Business Economics 4(1), 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, Steven J., John Haltiwanger and Scott Schuh, 1996a, Job Creation and Destruction, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, Steven J., John Haltiwanger and Scott Schuh, 1996b, ‘Small Business and Job Creation: Dissecting the Myth and Reassessing the Facts’, Small Business Economics 8(4), 297–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dertouzos, Michael L., Richard K. Lester, Robert M. Solow and the MIT Commission on Industrial Productivity, 1989, Made in America: Regaining the Productive Edge, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dosi, G., 1982, ‘Technological Paradigms and Technological Trajectories: A Suggested Interpretation of the Determinants and Directions of Technical Change’, Research Policy 13(1), 3–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dosi, G., 1988, ‘Sources, Procedures, and Microeconomic Effects of Innovation’, Journal of Economic Literature 26(3), 112–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunne, T., M. J. Roberts and L. Samuelson, 1989, ‘The Growth and Failure of U.S. Manufacturing Plants’, Quarterly Journal of Economics 104, 671–698.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, M., 1994a, ‘Knowledge Complementarity and Innovation’, Small Business Economics 6(3), 363–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, M., 1994b, The Geography of Innovation, Boston: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, Maryann P. and David B. Audretsch, 1999, ‘Innovation in Cities: Science-Based Diversity, Specialization and Localized Competition’, European Economic Review 43, 409–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feller, Irwin, 1997, ‘Federal and State Government Roles in Science and Technology’, Economic Development Quarterly 11(4), 283–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith, John Kenneth, 1956, American Capitalism, Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geroski, Paul A., 1991, ‘Some Data-Driven Reflections on the Entry Process’, in Paul Georski  and Joachin Schwalbach (eds.), Entry and Market Contestability: An International Comparison, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geroski, Paul A., 1995, ‘What Do We Know About Entry’, International Journal of Industrial Organization 13(4), 421–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geroski, Paul A. and Joachim Schwalbach (eds.), 1991, Entry and Market Contestability: An International Comparison, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaeser, E., H. Kallal, J. Scheinkman and A. Shleifer, 1992, ‘Growth of Cities’, Journal of Political Economy 100, 1126–1152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griliches, Zvi, 1979, ‘Issues in Assessing the Contribution of R&D to Productivity Growth’, Bell Journal of Economics 10 (Spring), 92–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, Bronwyn H., 1987, ‘The Relationship Between Firm Size and Firm Growth in the U.S. Manufacturing Sector’, Journal of Industrial Economics 35 (June), 583–605.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannan, Michael T. and John Freeman, 1989, Organizational Ecology, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschman, Albert O., 1970, Exit, Voice, and Loyalty, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, J., 1969, The Economy of Cities, New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaffe, A., 1989, ‘Real Effects of Academic Research’, American Economic Review 79, 957–970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaffe, A., Trajtenberg, M. and Henderson, R., 1993, ‘Geographic Localization of Knowledge Spillovers as Evidenced by Patent Citations’, Quarterly Journal of Economics 63, 577–598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jovanovic, Boyan, 1982, ‘Selection and Evolution of Industry’, Econometrica 50(2), 649–670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, Paul, 1991, Geography and Trade, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, R. C, A. K. Klevorick, R. R. Nelson and S. G. Winter, 1987, Appropriating the Returns From Industrial Research and Development. Brooking Papers on Economic Activity, Washington, D.C., pp. 783–820.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malecki, E. J., 1996, Technology and Economic Development, London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansfield, Edwin, 1962, ‘Entry, Gibrat’ Law, Innovation, and the Growth of Firms’, American Economic Review 52(5), 1023–1051.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mata, Jose, 1994, ‘Firm Growth During Infancy’, Small Business Economics 6(1), 27–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mata, J. and P. Portugal, 1994, ‘Life Duration of New Firms’, Journal of Industrial Economics 27(3), 227–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mata, Jose, Pedro Portugal and Paulo Guimaraes, 1995, ‘The Survival of New Plants: Start-Up Conditions and Post-Entry Evolution’, International Journal of Industrial Organization 13(4), 459–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, Richard R. and Sidney G. Winter, 1982, An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, Manfred, 1993, ‘Review of Entry and Market Contestability: An International Comparison’, International Journal of Industrial Organization 11(4), 593–594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M., 1990, The Comparative Advantage of Nations, New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratten, C. F., 1971, Economies of Scale in Manufacturing Industry, Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prevenzer, M., 1997, ‘The Dynamics of Industrial Clustering in Biotechnology’, Small Business Economics 9(3), 255–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saxenian, A., 1990, ‘Regional Networks and the Resurgence of Silicon Valley’, California Management Review 33, 89–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saxenian, Anna Lee, 1994, Regional Advantage, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, F. M., 1973, ‘The Determinants of Industry Plant Sizes in Six Nations’, Review of Economics and Statistics 55(2), 135–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, F. M., 1991, ‘Changing Perspectives on the Firm Size Problem’, in Z. J. Acs  and  D. B. Audretsch (eds.), Innovation and Technological Change. An International Comparison, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, Joseph A., 1942, Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy, New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, Rolf, 1996, ‘Technology Policies and the Growth of Regions’, Small Business Economics 8(2), 75–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutton, John, 1997, ‘Gibrat’s Legacy’, Journal of Economic Literature 35(1), 40–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thurow, Lester C, 1985, ‘Healing with a Thousand Bandages’, Challenge 28, 19–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyson, Laura, Tea Petrin and Halsey Rogers, 1994, ‘Promoting Entrepreneurship in Western Europe’, Small Business Economics 6(3), 165–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, Joachim, 1992, ‘Firm Size, Firm Growth, and Persistence of Chance: Testing Gibrat’s Law with Establishment Data from Lower Saxony, 1978–1989’, Small Business Economics 4(2), 125–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, Joachim, 1994, ‘Small Firm Entry in Manufacturing Industries: Lower Saxony, 1979–1989’, Small Business Economics 6(3), 211–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, L. W., 1964, ‘The Survival Technique and the Extent of Suboptimal Capacity’, Journal of Political Economy 72(3), 246–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, L. W., 1976, ‘Optimal Plant Scale and the Extent of Suboptimal Capacity’, in R. T. Masson and P. D. Quails (eds.), Essays on Industrial Organization in Honor of Joe S. Bain, Cambridge, Mass.: Ballinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, Leonard W., 1979, ‘The Structure-Conduct-Performance Paradigm and Antitrust’, University of Pennsylvania Law Review 127, 1104–1140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winter, Sidney G., 1984, ‘Schumpeterian Competition in Alternative Technological Regimes’, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 5, 287–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Ameritech Chair of Economic Development Institute of Development Strategies, Indiana University, SPEA, Suite 201, Bloomington, IN, 47405-2100, USA

    David B. Audretsch

Authors
  1. David B. Audretsch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. World Bank, Washington, USA

    Farrukh Iqbal

  2. Waseda University, Tokyo, Japan

    Shujiro Urata

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Audretsch, D.B. (2002). The Dynamic Role of Small Firms: Evidence from the U.S.. In: Iqbal, F., Urata, S. (eds) Small Firm Dynamism in East Asia. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0963-9_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0963-9_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-5326-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-0963-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation