Government-Business Coordination and Small Enterprise Performance in the Machine Tools Sector in Malaysia

  • Rajah Rasiah


This paper compares the performance of small and medium size subcontractors in the machine tools industry in two different states of Malaysia, Penang and Kelang Valley. It is shown that while Penang has developed a fairly successful small and medium subcontracting industry, Kelang Valley has not. The difference in performance (measured by value-added) is due in part to differences in the extent and quality of government-business coordination. In contrast to Kelang Valley, the relatively autonomous state government of Penang took a pro-active approach to business development and provided support to its small and medium enterprises (mainly Chinese-owned) in the form of public training and market-information exchange.


Machine Tool Local Firm Total Quality Management State Leadership Free Trade Zone 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Best, M., 1990, The New Competition, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Chee, P. L., 1986, Small and Medium Industries in Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur: Forum Press.Google Scholar
  3. Brusco, S., 1982, “The Emilian Model: Productive Decentralization and Social Integration’, Cambridge Journal of Economics 6(2), 167–184.Google Scholar
  4. Chee, P. L., D. Lee and R. T. Foo, 1981, ‘The Case of Labour Intensive Industry in Malaysia’, in R. Amjad (ed.), The Development of Labour Intensive Industry in ASEAN Countries, Bangkok: International Labour Organisation.Google Scholar
  5. Hirst, P. and J. Zeitlin, 1991, Reversing Industrial Decline? Industrial Structure and Policy in Britain and Her Competitors, Oxford: Berg Publishers.Google Scholar
  6. Khong, S. M., 1991, ‘The Service Sector in Malaysia: Structure and Change’, Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Cambridge University, Cambridge,Google Scholar
  7. Lim, L. Y. C, 1978, ‘Multinational Firms and Manufacturing for Export in Less Developed Countries: The Case of the Electronics Industry in Malaysia and Singapore’, Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Michigan University, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
  8. Nathan, R. et al., 1969, ‘The Penang Master Plan’, paper submitted to Penang Government. Penang.Google Scholar
  9. PDC, 1971, Annual Report, Penang: Penang Development Corporation.Google Scholar
  10. Rasiah, R., 1988, ‘The Semiconductor Industry in Penang: Implications for NIDL Theories’, Journal of Contemporary Asia 18(2), 24–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Rasiah R., 1992, ‘Foreign Manufacturing Investment in Malaysia’, Economic Bulletin for Asia Pacific 63(1), 63-77.Google Scholar
  12. Rasiah, R., 1993, Pembahagian Kerja Antarabangsa: Industri Semikonduktor di Pulau Pinang, Kuala Lumpur: Malaysian Social Science Association Press.Google Scholar
  13. Rasiah, R., 1994, ‘Flexible Production Systems and Local Machine Tool Subcontracting: Electronics Component Multinationals in Malaysia’, Cambridge Journalof Economics 18(3), 279–298.Google Scholar
  14. Rasiah, R., 1995, Foreign Capital and Industrialization in Malaysia, New York: St. Martin’sCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Rasiah, R., 1996a, ‘Industrialization as Engine of Growth and Industrial Policy in Malaysia’, Managerial Finance 9(2), 79–102.Google Scholar
  16. Rasiah, R., 1996b, ‘Changing Organisation of Work in the Electronics Industry in Malaysia’, Asia Pacific Viewpoint 37(1), 21–38.Google Scholar
  17. Rasiah, R., 1997, ‘Class, Ethnicity and Economic Development in Malaysia’, in G. Rodan, K. Hewisen and R. Robison (eds.), Political Economy of South-East Asia, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Rasiah, R., 1999, ‘From a Backyard Workshop to a Modern Machine Tool Factory: Eng Hardware’, in K. S. Jomo, G. Felker and R. Rasiah (eds.), Industrial Technology Development in Malaysia: Firm and Industry Studies, London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
  19. Sabel, C, 1986, ‘Changing Models of Economic Efficiency and their Implications for Industrialization in the Third World’, in C. F. D. Alejandro et al. (eds.), Development, Democracy and the Art of Trespassing, Notre Dame, IN.: Notre Dame University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Saxenian, A. L., 1997, The Regional Advantage, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Sengenberger, W. and F. Pyke, 1991, ‘Small Firm Industrial Districts and Local Economic Regeneration: Research and Policy Issues’, Labour and Society 16(1).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rajah Rasiah
    • 1
  1. 1.INTECHUnited Nations UniversityMaastrichtThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations