University of Nebraska — Lincoln

  • Eric Hartman
  • Diane Podolske
  • James Moeser
Part of the Outreach Scholarship book series (OUTR, volume 7)


Several in service learning yearn for a panacea, a brilliant burst of programmatic pontification that yields the ultimate answer for small offices with mighty tasks. At the University of Nebraska — Lincoln (NU), we have yet to unearth the end all in service learning programs, however, we have developed several replicable programs that address challenges familiar to practitioners of service learning. The types of difficulties we face are well-known throughout much of the profession. We work at a Research One, land-grant institution where research is pragmatically prioritized, but service to the community is included in the mission. Our office is young, struggling to gain footing and recognition on a campus of over 18,000 undergraduates and over 4,000 graduate students.


Community Agency Teaching Assistant Service Learning Service Leader Student Development 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Astin, A., & Sax, L. (1998). How undergraduates are affected by service participation. Journal of College Student Development, 39(3), 251–262.Google Scholar
  2. Axsom, T., & Piland, W.E. (1999, Summer). Effects of service learning on student retention and success. National Society for Experiential Education Quarterly, 15–19.Google Scholar
  3. Batchelder, T.H., & Root, S. (1994). Effects of an undergraduate program to integrate academic learning and service: cognitive, prosocial cognitive, and identity outcomes. Journal of Adolescence, 77(4), 341–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Calabrese, R.L., & Schumer, H. (1986). The effects of service activities on adolescent alienation. Adolescence, 21(3), 675–87.Google Scholar
  5. Corbett, F.C. (1977). The community involvement program: Social service as a factor in adolescent moral and psychological development. UMI Dissertation Reproductions.Google Scholar
  6. Dean, L., & Murdock, S.W. (1992, Summer). The effect of voluntary service on adolescent attitudes toward learning. Journal of Volunteer Administration, 5–10.Google Scholar
  7. Education Commission of the States (1993). Higher education and national service: A Campus Compact guide to the National and Community Service Trust Act of 1993. Denver: Author.Google Scholar
  8. Eyler, J., Giles, D. & Braxton, J. (1997). The impact of service learning on college students. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 4, 5–15.Google Scholar
  9. Giles, D., & Eyler, J. (1994). The theoretical roots of service learning in John Dewey: Toward a theory of service learning. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 7(1), 77–85.Google Scholar
  10. Hampton, L.R. (1999). The SERVE Model. Unpublished manuscript, Student Involvement, University of Nebraska-Lincoln.Google Scholar
  11. Krug, J.L. (1991). Select changes in high school students’ self-esteem and attitudes toward their school and community by their participation in service learning activities at a Rocky Mountain high school. UMI Dissertation Reproductions, No. 9318063.Google Scholar
  12. LeaderShape Institute (1998). Program Management Manual. Champaign, IL: LeaderShape, Inc.Google Scholar
  13. Markus, G.B., Howard, J., & King, D. (1993). Integrating community service and classroom instruction enhances learning: Results from an experiment. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 15(4), 410–419.Google Scholar
  14. Maton, K.I. (1990). Meaningful involvement in instrumental activity and well-being: Studies of older adolescents and at risk urban teenagers. American Journal of Community Psychology, 18(2), 297–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. McGill, J.C. (1992). The relationship of community service learning to developing mature interpersonal relationships in a sample of university students. UMI Dissertation Reproductions, No. 9312235.Google Scholar
  16. Morgan, W., & Streb, M. (2000, April 27–30). Effecting efficacy through service learning. Paper presented at the Midwest Political Science Association Conference, Chicago, Illinois.Google Scholar
  17. Myers-Lipton. (1998). Effects of a comprehensive service learning program on college students’ civic responsibility. Teaching Sociology, 26, 243–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Nebraska Consortium for Service-Learning in Higher Education (1999). Member Handbook. Lincoln, NE: Author.Google Scholar
  19. Rothman, M. (ed.). (1998). Establishing universities as citizens. Indianapolis, IN: Indiana Campus Compact.Google Scholar
  20. Schine, J. (1989). Young adolescents and community service. Washington, DC: Carnegie Council on Adolescent Development.Google Scholar
  21. Schmiede, A. (1995, Fall). Using focus groups in service learning: Implications for practice and research. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 63–71.Google Scholar
  22. Shumer, R. (1994). Community-based learning: Humanizing education. Journal of Adolescence, 17(4), 357–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Yates, M., & Youniss, J. (1996). A developmental perspective on community service in adolescence. Social Development, 5(1), 85–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eric Hartman
    • 1
  • Diane Podolske
    • 1
  • James Moeser
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Nebraska LincolnUSA

Personalised recommendations