Skip to main content

Conclusion: The Usefulness of Productivity Measurement

  • Chapter
Agricultural Productivity

Part of the book series: Studies in Productivity and Efficiency ((SIPE,volume 2))

  • 346 Accesses

Abstract

Productivity measurement for the U.S. agricultural sector has long been the subject of research. The early studies of Barton and Cooper (1948) and Loomis and Barton (1961) provided important guidelines for the practical aspects of productivity measurement. Subsequent studies have focused on aggregation procedures and on methods for adjusting input measures for quality changes (see, for example, Jorgenson and Griliches, 1967; Ball, 1985; Jorgenson, Gollop, and Fraumeni, 1987; Craig and Pardey, 1996; and Ball et al., 1997). More recently, Jorgenson and Stiroh (2000) have attempted to quantify agriculture’s contribution to aggregate productivity growth. The present volume extends productivity measurement in agriculture to the individual states, focusing on relative levels and growth rates of productivity across states. It also considers the economic costs of addressing undesirable environmental impacts of agricultural production.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Alston, J. M., C. Chan-Kang, M. C. Marra, P. G Pardey, and T. J. Wyatt. 2000. A Meta Analysis of Rates of Return to Agricultural R&D: Ex Pede Herculuem. IFPRI Research Report 113. Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, V. E. 1985. “Output, Input, and Productivity Measurement in U.S. Agriculture, 1948–79.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 67:475–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ball, V E., J-C Bureau, R. Nehring, and A. Somwaru. 1977. “Agricultural Productivity Revisited.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 79:1045–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barton, G., and R. Cooper. 1948. “Relation of Agricultural Production Inputs.” Review of Economics and Statistics, 30:117–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craig, B. and P. Pardey. 1996. “Productivity Measurement in the Presence of Quality Change.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 78:1349–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evenson, R. E. 2001. “Economic Impact Studies of Agricultural Research and Extension.” in Handbook of Agricultural Economics, volume 1, ed. B. L. Gardner and G. Rausser. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science/North Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, B. L. 1981. “Changes in the Quality of Agricultural Statistics — Inputs, Farm Income, Output, and Prices.” In Economic Statistics for Agriculture: Current Directions, Changes, and Concerns, ed. R.K. Perrin and E. Reinsel. Proceedings of a Symposium at the American Agricultural Economics Association meetings, Clemson, S.C. July.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griliches, Z. 1964. “Research Expenditures, Education, and the Aggregate Agricultural Production Function.” American Economic Review, 54:961–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huffman, W. E, and R. E. Evenson. 1993. Science for Agriculture. Ames: Iowa State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jorgenson, D., and Z. Griliches. 1967. “The Explanation of Productivity Change.” Review of Economic Studies, 99:249–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jorgenson, D., and K. Stiroh. 2000. Raising the Speed Limit: U.S. Economic Growth in the Information Age. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Vol. 1, pp. 125–211.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jorgenson, D., F. Gollop, and B. Fraumeni. 1987. Productivity and U.S. Economic Growth. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loomis, R.A. and G.T. Barton. 1961. Productivity of Agriculture. Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Evenson, R.E., Gardner, B.L., Jorgenson, D.W., Shumway, C.R. (2002). Conclusion: The Usefulness of Productivity Measurement. In: Ball, V.E., Norton, G.W. (eds) Agricultural Productivity. Studies in Productivity and Efficiency, vol 2. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0851-9_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0851-9_13

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-5270-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-0851-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics