Future Challenges and Institutional Preconditions for Regional Development Policy

  • Peter Maskell
Part of the Economics of Science, Technology and Innovation book series (ESTI, volume 25)

Abstract

An important transmutation has taken place in the global economy. For perhaps the first time ever, firms in less developed countries can now access the better part of the world’s markets on increasingly equal terms and acquire some of the most advanced technologies available while simultaneously benefiting from knowledge of others’ successful organizational designs and marketing strategies. Many basic features of inequality are certainly still at work (Bairoch and Kozul-Wright 1996; Bienefeld 1994), but any crude center-periphery model of global economic development is, nevertheless, getting less valid as some of the former third world countries push ahead, and as it is becoming increasingly obvious that endogenous factors (including corruption, unproductive investments, conspicuous consumption, and ethnic tension) are at least as important for curtailing economic growth as any post-imperialistic dominance exercised from actors in the first world. The genuine new opportunities for domestic or foreign firms in some (but clearly not all) of the low-cost countries of the world has sometimes occasioned amazingly high rates of growth in these areas and a subsequent rise in wage levels and the general standard of living. The current discrepancies are, however, of a magnitude that makes any imminent leveling of labor cost across countries highly unlikely. Global differences in costs will be here to stay for a considerable time.

Keywords

Europe Transportation Income Marketing Jurassic 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abramovitz, M. (1986). “Catching up, Forging Ahead, and Falling Behind.” Journal of Economic History 46: 358–406.Google Scholar
  2. Arrow, K. J. (1974). The Limits of Organization. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  3. Bairoch, P. (1996). “Globalization Myths and Realities: One Century of External Trade and Foreign Investment.” In R. Boyer and D. Drache, eds., States Against Markets: The Limits of Globalisation (pp. 173 — 192) London: Routledge..Google Scholar
  4. Bairoch, P., and R. Kozul-Wright. (1996). “Globalization Myths: Some Historical Reflections on Integration, Industrialization and Growth in the World Economy.” Discussion paper 113, Geneva United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD).Google Scholar
  5. Baldwin, R. E., and R. Forslid (1996). Trade Liberalization and Endogenous Growth: A q-Theory Approach. Discussion Paper 1397. London: Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR).Google Scholar
  6. Barro, R. J. (1991). “Economic Growth in a Cross-Section of Countries.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 106(2): 407–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ben-Porath, Y. (1980). “The F-Connection: Families, Friends and Firms in the Organization of Exchange.” Population and Development Review 1(6): 1 - 30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bienefeld, M. (1994). “Capitalism and the Nation State in the Dog Days of the Twentieth Century.” Socialist Register 30: 94–129.Google Scholar
  9. Boldrin, M., and J. A. Scheinkman. (1988). “Learning-by-Doing, International Trade and Growth: A Note.” in P. W. Anderson, K.J. Arrow, and D. Pines, eds., The Economy as an Evolving Complex System (pp. 285 - 300). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  10. Bourdieu, P. (1980). “Le capital social: notes provisoires.” Actes de la recherche en sciences socials 31: 2 - 3.Google Scholar
  11. Bourdieu, P. (1997). “The Forms of Capital.” in A. H. Halsey, H. Lauder, P. Brown, and S. A. Wells, eds., Education; Culture, Economy and Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 46–58.Google Scholar
  12. Bretschger, L. (1997). “International Trade, Knowledge Diffusion and Growth.” International Trade Journal 11(3): 327–348.Google Scholar
  13. Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural Holes. The Social Structure of Competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Chandler, A. D. (1977). The Visible Hand. The Managerial Revolution in American Business. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Chandler, A. D. (1990). Scale and Scope. The Dynamics of Industrial Capitalism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Coleman, J. S. (1988). “Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital.” American Journal of Sociology 94 (Supp.): S95 - S120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cunningham, W. (1902). “The Location of Industry.” Economic Journal 29 (12): 501–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. David, P. A., and G. Wright. (1995). “The Origins of American Resource Abundance.” Mimeo.Google Scholar
  19. DeBresson, C., ed. (1996). Economic Interdependence and Innovative Activity. Cheltenham: Elgar.Google Scholar
  20. Denison, E. F. (1967). Why Growth Rates Differ. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
  21. De Vet, J. M. (1993). Globalisation and Local and Regional Competitiveness. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  22. Dicken, P. (1994). “Global-Local Tension: Firms and States in the Global Space-Economy.” Economic Geography 70: 101 - 128.Google Scholar
  23. Edquist, C. (1990). Technology Policy. Working Paper 90/0075, Linköping: Linköping University.Google Scholar
  24. Feis, H. (1934). Europe: The World’s Banker 1870–1914. Clifton: Kelley.Google Scholar
  25. Fleenor, D. (1993). “The Coming and Going of the Global Corporation.” Columbia Journal of World Business 28(4): 6–16.Google Scholar
  26. Foss, N. J., ed., (1997). Resources,Firms and Strategies. A Reader in the Resource-Based Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Fölster, S. (1995). “Do Subsidies to Co-operative R&D Actually Stimulate R&D Investment and Co-Operation?” Research Policy 24: 404 - 417.Google Scholar
  28. Freeman, C. (1991). “Networks of Innovators: A Synthesis of Research Issues.” Research Policy 20 (5): 5–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Freeman, C. (1995). “The `National System of Innovation’ in Historic Perspective.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 1(19): 5 - 24.Google Scholar
  30. Freeman, R. B. (1995). “Are Your Wages Set in Beijing?” Journal of Economic Perspectives 9 (3): 5–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Fukuyama, F. (1995). Trust: The Social Virtue and the Creation of Prosperity. London: Hamish Hamilton.Google Scholar
  32. Fukuyama, F. (1999). The Great Disruption. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  33. Germidis, D. (1980). International Subcontracting. Paris: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD).Google Scholar
  34. Gerschenkron, A. (1962). Economic Backwardness in Historical Perspective. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
  35. Gordon, D. M. (1995). “The Global Economy: New Edifice or Crumbling Foundations?” New Left Review 168: 14 - 64.Google Scholar
  36. Grabher, G. (1993). The Embedded Firm: On the Socioeconomics of Industrial Networks. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  37. Greif, A. (1994). “Cultural Beliefs and the Organization of Society: A Historical and Theoretical Reflection on Collectivist and Individualist Societies.” Journal of Political Economy 102(5): 912 - 950.Google Scholar
  38. Hall, R. E., and C. I. Jones. (1999). “Why Do Some Countries Produce So Much More Output Per Worker Than Others?” Quarterly Journal of Economics 114(1): 83 - 116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hatzichronoglou, T. (1996). Globalisation and Competitiveness: Relevant Indicators. Working Paper 16 (IV). Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD), Directorate for Science, Technology and Industry.Google Scholar
  40. Held, D., A. McGrew, D. Goldblatt, and J. Perraton. (1999). Global Transformation. Politics. Economics and Culture. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  41. Hirst, P., and G. Thompson. (1996). Globalization in Question. The International Economy and Possibilities of Governance. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  42. Hirst, P., and G. Thompson. (1999). “Globalization: Frequently Asked Questions and Some Surprising Answers.” In P. Leisink, ed., Globalization and Labour Relations (pp. 36–56). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  43. Holtein, W. J., S. Reed, J. Kapstein, T. Vogel, and J. Weber. (1990). “The Stateless Corporation.” Business Week, May 14, pp. 52 — 59.Google Scholar
  44. Hu, Y.-S. (1992). “Global or Stateless Corporations Are National Firms with International Operations.” California Management Review 34(2): 107 - 126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Imrie, R. F. (1986). “Work Decentralisation from Large to Small Firms: A Preliminary Analysis of Subcontracting.” Environment and Planning A 187): 949 - 965.Google Scholar
  46. Kuznets, S. (1971). Economic Growth of Nations: Total Output and Population Structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  47. Langlois, R. N. (1999). “Scale, Scope and the Reuse of Knowledge.” In S. C. Dow and P. E. Earl, eds., Economic Organization and Economic Knowledge. Essays in Honour of Brian J. Loasby,(vol. 1) pp. 239 - 254). Cheltenham: Elgar.Google Scholar
  48. List, F. (1841). The National System of Political Economy. London: Longmans, Green.Google Scholar
  49. Lundvall, B.-A., and P. Maskell. (2000). “Nation States and Economic Development: From National Systems of Production to National Systems of Knowledge Creation and Learning.” In G. L. Clark, M. P. Feldman, and M. S. Gertler, eds., The Oxford Handbook of Economic Geography (pp. 353 — 372). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Maddison, A. (1991). Dynamic Forces in Capitalist Development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Maddison, A. (1995). Monitoring the World Economy 1820 — 1992. Development Centre Studies. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  52. Maskell, P. (1999). “Globalisation and Industrial Competitiveness: The Process and Consequences of Ubiquitification.” In E. J. Malecki and P. Oings, eds., Making Connections: Technological Learning and Regional Economic Change (pp.35 — 60). Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  53. Maskell, P. (2000). “Social Capital and Competitiveness.” In S. Baron, J. Field and T. Schuller, eds., Social Capital. Critical Perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  54. Maskell, P., H. Eskelinen, I. Hannibalsson, A. Malmberg, and E. Vatne. (1998). Competitiveness,Localised Learning and Regional Development. Specialisation and Prosperity in Small Open Economies. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  55. Maskell, P., and A. Malmberg (1999). “Localised Learning and Industrial Competitiveness.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 23(2): 167 - 186.Google Scholar
  56. Metcalfe, J. S. (1995). “The Economic Foundations of Technology Policy: Equilibrium and Evolutionary Perspectives.” In P. Stoneman, ed. Handbook of the Economics of Innovation and Technological Change (pp.409 - 512). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  57. Metcalfe, J. S., and M. Gibbons. (1997). Technology Policy in an Evolutionary World. Building the European Information Society for Us All. Final policy report of the high-level expert group. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. Brussels European Commission.Google Scholar
  58. Miller, C., ed. (1998). Developing and Newly Industrializing Countries. Cheltingham: Elgar.Google Scholar
  59. Mjaset, L. (1992). “Comparative Typologies of Development Patterns.” In L. Mjeset, ed., Contributions to the Comparative Study of Development. Oslo: Institute for Social Research Report.Google Scholar
  60. Montgomery, C. A., ed.,(1995). Resource-Based and Evolutionary Theories of the Firm: Towards a Synthesis. Boston: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  61. Morris, C. T., and I. Adelman. (1988). Comparative Patterns of Economic Development 1850 —1914. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  62. Nelson, R. R. ed., (1993). National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  63. Olson, M. (1982). The Rise and Decline of Nations. Economic Growth, Stagflation and Social Rigidities. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  64. Penrose, E. T. (1959). The Theory of the Growth of Firms. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  65. Porter, M. E. (1990). The Competitive Advantages of Nations. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  66. Portes, A., and J. Sensenbrenner. (1993). “Embeddedness and Immigration: Notes on the Social Determinants of Economic Action.” American Journal of Sociology 98(6): 1320–1350.Google Scholar
  67. Prahalad, C. K., and G. Hamel. (1990). “The Core Competence of The Corporation.” Harvard Business Review 68(3): 79 - 91.Google Scholar
  68. Putnam, R. D. (1993). Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  69. Reich, R. (1990). “But Now We’re Global.” The Times 31: 925 - 926.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Richardson, G. B. (1972). “The Organisation of Industry.” Economic Journal 82: 883 - 896.Google Scholar
  71. Richardson, G. B. (1997). Economic Analysis, Public Policy and the Software Industry.Working Paperhttp://www.business.auc/DRUID Aalborg and Copenhagen: DRUID.Google Scholar
  72. Richardson, G. B. (1998). Production,Planning and Prices. Working Paperhttp://www.business.auc/DRUIDAalborg and Copenhagen: DRUID.Google Scholar
  73. Rodrik, D. (1997). Has Globalization Gone Too Far? Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.Google Scholar
  74. Rosenberg, N. (1972). Technology and American Economic Growth. White Plains, NY: Sharpe.Google Scholar
  75. Ruggie, J. G. (1993). “Territoriality and Beyond.” International Organizaton 41.Google Scholar
  76. Rumelt, R. P. (1984). “Towards a Strategic Theory of the Firm.” In R. B. Lamb, ed., Competitive Strategic Management (pp. 556 - 570). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  77. Senghaas, D. (1982). Von Europa lernen. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp. (Translated to English by K. M. Kimmig and published under the title The European Experience. A Historical Critique of Development Theory. Leamington Spa: Berg, 1985.Google Scholar
  78. Smith, A. (1979). An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. 1776. London: W. Strahan and T. Cadell. Reprinted with a foreword by Andrew Skinner, Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  79. Soskice, D. (1994). “Reconciling Markets and Institutions: The German Apprenticeship System.” In L. Lynch, ed., Training and the Private Sector (pp. 25 — 60). Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
  80. Staber, U. (1997). “Specialization in a Declining Industrial District.” Growth and Change 28: 475 - 495.Google Scholar
  81. Stoneman, P. (1997). Economic Analysis of Technological Policy. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  82. Strange, S. (1991). “New World Order: Conflict and Cooperation.” Marxism Today (January): 30 - 32.Google Scholar
  83. Teece, D. J. (1980). “Economies of Scope and the Scope of the Enterprise.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 3: 223 - 247.Google Scholar
  84. Vickery, G., and C. Casadio. (1996). “The Globalisation of Investment and Trade.” In J. de la Mothe and G. Pacquet, eds., Evolutionary Economics and the New International Political Economy (pp. 83 - 117). London: Pinter.Google Scholar
  85. Wade, R. (1996). “Globalization and Its Limits: Reports of the Death of the National Economy are Greatly Exaggerated.” In S. Berger and R. Dore, eds. National Diversity and Global Capitalism (pp. 60 — 88). Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  86. Wernerfelt, B. (1984). “A Resource-Based View of the Firm.” Strategic Management 5: 171–180.Google Scholar
  87. Woolcock, M. (1998). “Social Capital and Economic Development: Toward a Theoretical Synthesis and Policy Framework.” Theory and Society 27: 151–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Worthington, R. (1993). “Introduction: Science and Technology as a Global System.” Science, Technology and Human Values 18: 176 - 185.Google Scholar
  89. Yaffey, M. (1998). “Moral Standards and Transaction Costs: Long-Term Effects.” In K. Nielsen and B. Johnson, eds., Institutions and Economic Change: New Perspectives on Markets, Firms and Technology (pp. 258 - 290). Cheltenham: Elgar.Google Scholar
  90. Young, A. (1928). “Increasing Returns and Economic Progress.” Economic Journal 38: 527–542.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter Maskell
    • 1
  1. 1.Danish Research Unit for Industrial Dynamics (DRUID)Department of Industrial Economics and Strategy (IVS)

Personalised recommendations