Skip to main content

The Development of High-Tech Clusters

Theoretical Insights and Policy Implications

  • Chapter
Institutions and Systems in the Geography of Innovation

Part of the book series: Economics of Science, Technology and Innovation ((ESTI,volume 25))

Abstract

This need for the emergence of “growing points” or “growth poles” in the course of the development process means that international and interregional inequality of growth is an inevitable concomitant and condition of growth itself. Thus in the geographic sense, growth is necessarily unbalanced.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Acs, Z. J., D. B. Audretsch, and M. P. Feldman. (1992). “Real Effects of Academic Research: Comment.” American Economic Review 82(1): 363 - 367.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adams, R. D., and K. McCormick. (1987). “Private Goods, Club Goods, and Public Goods as a Continuum.” Review of Social Economy 45(2): 192 - 199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arthur, W. B. (1988). “Urban System and Historical Path Dependency.” In J. H. Ausubel and R. Herman, eds., Cities and Their Vital Systems (pp. 85 - 97) Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arthur W. B. (1990). “Silicon Valley Locational Clusters: When Do Increasing Returns Imply Monopoly?” Mathematical Social Sciences 19: 235 - 251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blakely E. J. (1989). Planning Local Economic Development. Theory and Practice. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, W. D., and H. J. Jacek, eds. (1989). Regionalism,Business Interests and Public Policy. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delors, J. (1993). White Paper on Growth, Competitiveness, and Employment. The Challenges and Ways Forward into the Twenty-first Century, Brussels: European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dendrinos, D. S., and H. Mullally. (1985). Urban Evolution. Studies in the Mathematical Ecology of Cities. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dollar, D., and E. N. Wolff. (1993). Competitiveness,Convergence and International Specialisation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doz, Y. (1987). “International Industries: Fragmentation versus Globalization.” In B. Guile and H. Brooks, eds., Technology and Global Industry (pp. 96 - 118) New York: National Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edquist, C. (1995). “The Role of Governments and Markets in Science and Technology Innovation Policies.” Paper presented at the workshop Role and Impact of Science and Technology in Innovation and Regional Economic Development, University of British Columbia, Victoria, August 23 - 25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, M. P. (1994). The Geography of Innovation, Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fujita, M. (1986). “Optimal Location of Public Facilities: Area Dominance Approach.” Regional Science and Urban Economics 16: 241–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fujita, M. (1990). “Spatial Interactions and Agglomeration in Urban Economics.” In M. Chatterji and R. E. Kuenne, eds., New Frontiers of Regional Science (pp. 184–221) London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gambarotto, F., and M. A. Maggioni. (1998). “Regional Development Strategies in Changing Environments: an Ecological Approach.” Regional Studies 32: 49 - 61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibb, J. M. (1985). Science Parks and Innovation Centres: Their Economic and Social Impact. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, D.V., G. Kometsky, and R. W. Smilor. (1992). The Technopolis Phenomenon: Smart Cities, Fast Systems,Global Networks. Lanham: Rowman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, J. V. (1977). Economic Theory and the Cities. New York: National Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilpert, U., ed. (1991). Regional Innovation and Decentralization: High Tech Industry and Government Policy. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isard, W. (1956). Location and Space-Economy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaldor, N. (1970). “The Case for Regional Policies.” Scottish Journal of Political Economy 3: 337 - 348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, P. (1991a). Geography and Trade. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, P. (1991b). “Increasing Returns and Economic Geography.” Journal of Political Economy 99(3): 483 - 499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, P. (1995). Development,Geography and Economic Theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Longhi, C., and M. Queré. (1991). “La technopôle comme système industriel localisé: eléments d’analyse et d’enseignements empiriques.” Economies et Societés 25(8): 21 - 41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lotka, A. J. (1925). Elements of Physical Biology. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luger, M. I., and H. A. Goldstein. (1991). Technology in the Garden: Research Parks and Regional Economic Development. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maggioni, M. A. (1990). “Sostegno reale all’innovazione: lo strumento degli Science Parks. Un confronto internazionale per l’analisi della realtà italiana.” Dynamis-Quaderni IDSE, 10/90, IDSE-CNR, Milano.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maggioni, M. A. (1993). “Ecological Dynamics and Critical Mass Processes in the Location of High Tech Firms.” Paper presented at the Fortieth RSAI (Regional Sciences Association International) Conference, North American Section, Houston, November 11 - 14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maggioni, M. A. (1994). “Modelli ecologici per l’analisi della dinamica industriale regionale.” In F. Pasquini, T. Pompili, and P. Secondini, eds., Modelli d’analisi e d ’intervento per un nuovo regionalismo (pp. 79 - 105). Milano: FrancoAngeli.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maggioni, M. A. (1995). “The Economic Analysis of Science and Technology Parks: Theoretical Suggestions and the Italian Experience.” Sviluppo Economico 1(1–2): 149–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maggioni, M. A. (1999). “Clustering Dynamics and the Location of High-Tech Firms.” Ph.D. thesis, University of Warwick, Coventry, July.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maggioni, M. A. (2000). Structure and Dynamics of High-Tech Clusters: An Econometric Exercise. Quaderno 12/2000, Dipartimento di Economia, Istituzioni e Territorio, Università degli Studi di Ferrara, Ferrara, Luglio.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maggioni, M. A., and G. Porro. (1994). “Dinamiche di crescita regionale: it ruolo delle aspettative in modelli di tipo ecologico.” Quaderno della ricerca di base “Modelli di sviluppo e regional competition, 6, Università Bocconi, Milano.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markusen, A. R. (1987). Regions:The Economics and Politics of Territor. Ottowa: Rowman and Allanheld.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markusen, A. R., P. Hall, and A. Glassmeier. (1986). High-Tech America. Boston: Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, A. (1921). Industry and Trade. London: MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, M. (1987). Long Waves of Regional Development. London: MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maskell, P. (1997). “Apprendimento localizzato e competitività industriale.” in A. Bramanti and M. A. Maggioni, eds., La dinamica dei sistemi produttivi territoriali: teorie,tecniche, politiche (pp. 112 - 133) Milano: FrancoAngeli..

    Google Scholar 

  • Miyao, T., and Y. Kanemoto. (1987). Urban Dynamics and Urban Externalities, London: Harwood.

    Google Scholar 

  • Office of Technology Assessment (OTA). (1984). Technology,Innovation, and Regional Economic Development. Washington, DC: OTA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Padmore, T., and H. Gibson. (1998). “Modelling Systems of Innovation: II. A Framework for Industrial Cluster Analysis in Regions.” Research Policy 26: 625 - 641.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papageorgiou, Y. Y. (1979). “Agglomerations.” Regional Science and Urban Economics 9: 41–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pascal, A. H., and J. J. McCall. (1980). “Agglomeration Economies, Search Costs and Industrial Location.” Journal of Urban Economics 8: 383 - 388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearl, R., and L. J. Reed. (1920). “Skew-Growth Curves.” Proceeding of the National Academy of Natural Sciences of the USA 11: 16 - 22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perroux, F. (1955). “Note sur la notion de pôle de croissance.” Economie Appliquée, 8: 307–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preer, R. W. (1992). The Emergence of Technopolis, Knowedge-Intensive Technologies and Regional Development. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Premus, R. (1982). Location of High-Technology Firms and Regional Economic Development: A Staff Study. Joint Economic Committee, Congress of the United States. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rees, J., and H. Stafford. (1983). Theories of Regional Growth and Industrial Location: Their Relevance for High Technology Industry in the United States. Washington, DC: OTA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Regional Studies .(1994). “Special Issue on New Firms Formation.” 28(4) January.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, H. W. (1978). Regional and Urban Economics. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roughgarden, J. (1979). Theory of Population Genetics and Evolutionary Ecology: An Introduction. New York: MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, D. (1988). “Science Parks: The UK Experience.” In S. Campodall’Orto and C. Roveda, eds. Parchi scientifici come strumenti di politica industriale. pp. 35 - 57 Milano: FrancoAngeli.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saxenian, A. (1994). Regional Advantage, Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, A. J. (1993). Technopolis: High-Technology Industry and Regional Development in Southern California. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smilor, R. W., G. Kozmetsky, and D. V. Gibson, eds. (1988). Creating the Technopolys: Linking Technology,Commercialization and Economic Development. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. (1997). “Does Location Matter? On the Impact of Innovation Centres on the Development of Innovation Oriented Start-ups.” Paper presented at the workshop “Firms Dynamics in High-Technology Industries,” ZEW, Mannheim, June 9 - 10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Storey, D. J., and B. S. Tether. (1998a). “New Technology-Based Firms in the European Union: An Introduction.” Research Policy 26: 933 - 946.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Storey, D. J., and B. S. Tether. (1998b). “Public Policy Measures to Support New Technology-Based Firms in the European Union.” Research Policy 26: 1307 - 1357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Storper, M. (1997). The Regional Word: Territorial Development in a Global Economy. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Storper, M., and R. Walker. (1989). The Capitalist Imperative. Territory, Technology and Industrial Growth. New York: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swann, G. M. P. (1998). “Towards a Model of Clustering in High-Technology Industries.” In G. M. P. Swann, M. Prevezer, and D. Stout, eds., The Dynamics of Industrial Clustering (pp. 52 - 76) Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swann, G. M. P., M. Prevezer, and D. Stout, eds. (1998). The Dynamics of Industrial Clustering. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tauchen, H., and A. D. Witte. (1983). “An Equilibrium Model of Office Location and Contact Patterns.” Environment and Planning A 15: 1311–1326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Temple, P. (1998). “Cluster and Competitiveness, A Policy Perspective.” In M. P. Swann, M. Prevezer, and D. Stout, eds., The Dynamics of Industrial Clustering (pp. 257–297) Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verhulst, P. F. (1845). “Recherches mathématique sur la loi d’accroissement de la population.” Nouveaux Mémoires de l’Académie Royale des Sciences et Belles-Lettres de Bruxelles 18 (2): 3 - 38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, A. (1929). Theory of the Location of Industry. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westhead, P., and D. J. Storey. (1994). An Assessment of Firms Located On and Off Science Parks in the United Kingdom. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Maggioni, M.A. (2002). The Development of High-Tech Clusters. In: Feldman, M.P., Massard, N. (eds) Institutions and Systems in the Geography of Innovation. Economics of Science, Technology and Innovation, vol 25. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0845-8_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0845-8_15

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-5267-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-0845-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics