Skip to main content

From Concordance / Discordance to the Modelling of Positive and Negative Reasons in Decision Aiding

  • Chapter
Aiding Decisions with Multiple Criteria

Abstract

The principle of concordance/discordance was introduced by B. Roy in his very early work on Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis. Although such a principle is grounded by strong evidence from real life decision situations, the way in which it has been implemented in existing MCDA methods allows only for its partial and limited use. Indeed, the principle lacks a theoretical frame enabling a more general use in decision analysis. The paper presents a possible generalisation of this principle under the concepts of positive and negative reasons. For this purpose, a new formalism, (a four valued logic) is suggested. Under such a formalism the concordance test is seen as the evaluation of the existence of positive reasons supporting the sentence “x is at least as good as y”, while the discordance test can be viewed as the evaluation of the existence of negative reasons against the same sentence. A number of results obtained in preference modelling and aggregation shows the potentiality of this approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Belnap N.D., (1977), “A useful four-valued logic”, in G. Epstein, J. Dumm, (eds.), Modern uses of multiple valued logics, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, 8–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouyssou D., (1992a), “On some properties of outranking relations based on a concordance — discordance principle”, in A. Goicoechea, L. Duckstein and S. Zionts, (eds.), Multiple criteria decision making, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 93–106.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bouyssou D., (1992b), “Ranking methods based on valued preference relations: A characterization of the net flow network”, European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 60, 61–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouyssou D., (1996), “Outranking relations: do they have special properties?”, Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, vol. 5, 99–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouyssou D., Perny, P., (1992), “Ranking method for valued preference relations: A characterization of a method based on leaving and entering flows”, European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 61, 186–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouyssou D., Pirlot M., (1997), “Choosing and ranking on the basis of fuzzy preference relations with the’Min in Favor”, in G. Fandel, T. Gal, (eds.), Multiple criteria decision making, Springer Verlag, Berlin, 115–127.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bouyssou D., Pirlot M., (1999), “Conjoint measurement without additivity and transitivity”, in N. Meskens, M. Roubens, (eds.), Advances in Decision Analysis, Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 13–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouyssou D., Vincke Ph., (1997), “Ranking alternatives on the basis of preference relations: a progress report with special emphasis on outranking relations”, Journal of Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis, vol. 6, 77–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouyssou D., Pirlot M., Vincke Ph., (1997), “A general model of preference aggregation”, in M.H. Karwan, J. Spronk, J. Wallenius, (eds.), Essays in decision making, Springer Verlag, Berlin, 120–134.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bouyssou D., Marchant Th., Perny P., Pirlot M., Tsoukiàs A., Vincke Ph., (2000), Evaluation and Decision Models: a critical perspective, Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brans J.P., Vincke Ph., (1985), “A preference ranking organization method”, Management Science, vol. 31, 647–656.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dubois D., Prade H., (1988), Possibility Theory, Plenum Press, New York.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fargier H., Perny P., (2001), “Modélisation des préférences par une règle de concordance généralisée”, in A. Colorni, M. Parruccini, B. Roy (eds.), Selected Papers from 49 th and 50 th meetings of the EURO Working Group on MCDA, EUR-Report, to appear.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitting M.C., (1991), “Bilattices and the semantics of Logic Programming”, Journal of Logic Programming, vol. 11, 91–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fortemps Ph., Słowiński R., (2001), “A graded quadrivalent logic for ordinal preference modelling”, Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, vol. 1, no. 1.

    Google Scholar 

    Google Scholar 

  • Grabisch M., Perny P., (2001), “Agrégation Multicritère”, in B. Bouchon-Meunier, C. Marsala (eds.). Utilisation de la logique floue, Hermès, Paris, to appear.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ginsberg M., (1988), “Multivalued logics: A uniform approach to reasoning in artificial intelligence”, Computational Intelligence, vol. 4, 265–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greco S., Matarazzo B., Słowiński R., Tsoukiàs A., (1998), “Exploitation of a rough approximation of the outranking relation in Multi-Criteria Choice and Ranking”, in T.J. Stewart and R.C. van der Honert (eds.), Trends in Multi-Criteria Decision Making, Springer Verlag, LNEMS 465, Berlin, 45–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greco S., Matarazzo B., Słowiński R., (2001), “Conjoint measurement and rough set approach for multicriteria sorting problems in presence of ordinal criteria”, in A. Colorni, M. Paruccini, B. Roy, (eds.), AMCDA: Selected papers from the 49 th and 50 th meetings of the EURO MCDA Working Group, EUR-report, Ispra, 114–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marchant Th., (1996), “Valued relations aggregation with the Borda method”, Journal of Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis, vol. 5, 127–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ngo The A., Tsoukiàs A., Vincke Ph., (2000), “A polynomial time algorithm to detect PQI interval orders”, International Transactions of Operations Research, vol. 7, 609–623.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ngo The A., Tsoukiàs A., (2001), “A new axiomatisation of PQI interval orders”, submitted.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostanello A., (1985), “Outranking relations”, in G. Fandel, J. Spronk, Multiple Criteria Decision Methods and Applications, Springer Verlag, Berlin, 41–60.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Perny P., (1998), “Multicriteria filtering methods based on concordance and non-discordance principles”, Annals of Operations Research, vol. 80, 137–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perny P., Roubens M., (1998), “Preference Modelling”, in Handbook of Fuzzy Sets and Possibility Theory, Operations Research and Statistics, R. Słowiński (ed.), D. Dubois et H. Prade (series eds.), Kluwer Academic Publishers, 3–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perny P., Roy B., (1992), “The use of fuzzy Outranking Relations in Preference Modelling”, in Fuzzy sets and Systems, vol. 49, 33–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perny P., Tsoukiàs A., (1998), “On the continuous extension of a four valued logic for preference modelling”, in Proceedings of the IPMU 1998 conference, 302–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pirlot M., (1995), “A characterization of ‘min’ as a procedure for exploiting valued preference relations and related results”, Journal of Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis, vol. 4, 37–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pirlot M., (1997), “A common framework for describing some outranking methods”, Journal of Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis, vol. 6, 86–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roy B., (1968), “Classement et choix en présence de points de vue multiples (Le méthode ELECTRE)”, Revue Française d’Informatique et de Recherche Opérationnelle, vol. 8, 57–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy B., (1978), ELECTRE III: Un algorithme de classement fondé sur une représentation floue des préférences en présence de critères multiples, Cahiers du CERO, vol. 20, 1, 3–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy B., (1991), “The outranking approach and the foundations of ELECTRE methods”, Theory and Decision, vol. 31, 49–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roy B., Bouyssou D., (1993), Aide Multicritère à la Décision: Methodes et cas, Economica, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy B., Mousseau V., (1996), “A theoretical framework for analysing the notion of relative importance of criteria”, Journal of Multi-criteria Decision Analysis, vol. 5, 145–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roy B., Skalka J.-M., (1984), „ELECTRE IS: Aspects méthodologiques et guide d’utilisation“, Technical Report, Document du LAMSADE N°30, Université Paris Dauphine, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy B., Vincke Ph., (1984), “Relational systems of preferences with one or more pseudo-criteria: some new concepts and results”, Management Science, vol. 30, 1323–1335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roy B., Vincke Ph., (1987), “Pseudo-orders: definition, properties and numerical representation”, Mathematical Social Sciences, vol. 14, 263–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsoukiàs A., (1996), “A first-order, four valued, weakly paraconsistent logic”, Cahier du LAMSADE n. 139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsoukiàs A., (1997), “Sur la généralisation des concepts de concordance et discordance en aide multicrite à la décision”, Mémoire présenté pour l’obtention de l’habilitation à diriger des recherches, Université Paris Dauphine, appeared also as Document du LAMSADE. n. 117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsoukiàs A., Vincke Ph., (1995), “A new axiomatic foundation of partial comparability”, Theory and Decision, vol. 39, 79–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsoukiàs A., Vincke Ph., (1997), “Extended preference structures in MCDA”, in J. Clímaco (ed.), Multi-criteria Analysis, Springer Verlag, Berlin, 37–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsoukiàs A., Vincke Ph., (1998), “Double Threshold Orders: a new axiomatisation”, Journal of Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis, vol. 7, 285–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsoukiàs A., Vincke Ph., (2001), “A characterization of PQI interval orders”, to appear in Discrete Applied Mathematics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanderpooten, D., (1990), “The construction of prescriptions in outranking methods”, in Bana e Costa CA., (ed.), Readings in Multiple Criteria Decision Aid, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 184–215.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Vincke Ph., (1982), “Aggregation of preferences: a review”, European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 9, 17–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vincke Ph., (1988), “P,Q,I preference structures”, in J. Kacprzyk, M. Roubens, eds., Non conventional preference relations in decision making, LNEMS 301, Springer Verlag, Berlin, 72–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vincke Ph., (1992a), “Exploitation of a crisp relation in a ranking problem”, Theory and Decision, vol. 32, 221–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vincke Ph., (1992b), Multicriteria Decision Aid, J. Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vincke Ph., (1999), “The Outranking Approach”, in T. Gal, Th. Stewart, Th. Hanne, (eds.), Multicriteria Decision Making; Advances in MCDM Models, Algorithms, Theory and Applications, Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Denis Bouyssou Eric Jacquet-Lagrèze Patrice Perny Roman Słowiński Daniel Vanderpooten Philippe Vincke

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tsoukiàs, A., Perny, P., Vincke, P. (2002). From Concordance / Discordance to the Modelling of Positive and Negative Reasons in Decision Aiding. In: Bouyssou, D., Jacquet-Lagrèze, E., Perny, P., Słowiński, R., Vanderpooten, D., Vincke, P. (eds) Aiding Decisions with Multiple Criteria. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, vol 44. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0843-4_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0843-4_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-5266-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-0843-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics