Abstract
The classification of a set of alternatives into predefined homogenous groups is a problem with major practical interest in many fields. Over the past two decades several non-parametric approaches have been developed to address the classification problem, originating from several scientific fields. Among these approaches, multicriteria decision aid (MCDA) has several attractive features, involving its decision support orientation. This paper is focused on the preference disaggregation approach of MCDA (PDA). The objective of this study is to explore whether the attractive features of PDA also lead to higher efficiency in terms of classification accuracy, as opposed to traditional statistical classification procedures. For this purpose an extensive Monte Carlo simulation is conducted. The methods considered in this simulation include a well-known classification method based on the PDA paradigm, namely the UTADIS method (UTilités Additives DIScriminantes), and three statistical classification procedures, namely the linear discriminant analysis, the quadratic discriminant analysis and the logit analysis. The results indicate that the UTADIS method outperforms the considered parametric techniques in the majority of the data conditions that are used in the simulation.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Altman, E.I., Avery, R., Eisenbeis, R. and Stinkey, J. (1981), Application of Classification Techniques in Business, Banking and Finance, Contemporary Studies in Economic and Financial Analysis, Vol. 3, JAI Press, Greenwich.
Anderson, T.W. (1958), An Introduction to Multivariate Statistical Analysis, Wiley, New York.
Bajgier, S.M. and Hill, A.V. (1982), “An experimental comparison of statistical and linear programming approaches to the discriminant problem”, Decision Sciences, 13, 604–618.
Dias, L., Mousseau, V., Figueira, J. and Climaco, J. (2000), “An aggregation/disaggregation approach to obtain robust conclusions with ELECTRE TRI”, Cahier du LAMSADE, No 174, Université de Paris-Dauphine.
Doumpos, M., Zopounidis, C. and Pardalos, P.M. (2000), “Multicriteria sorting methodology: Application to financial decision problems”, Parallel Algorithms and Applications, 15/1–2, 113–129.
Freed, N. and Glover, F. (1981), “Simple but powerful goal programming models for discriminant problems”, European Journal of Operational Research, 7, 44–60.
Jacquet-Lagrèze, E. (1995), “An application of the UTA discriminant model for the evaluation of R & D projects”, in: P.M. Pardalos, Y. Siskos, C. Zopounidis (eds.), Advances in Multicriteria Analysis, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 203–211.
Jacquet-Lagrèze, E. and Siskos, Y. (1982), “Assessing a set of additive utility functions for multicriteria decision making: The UTA method”, European Journal of Operational Research, 10, 151–164.
Jacquet-Lagrèze, E. and Siskos, J. (2001), “Preference disaggregation: Twenty years of MCDA experience”, European Journal of Operational Research, 130/2, 233–245.
Joachimsthaler, E.A. and Stam, A. (1988), “Four approaches to the classification problem in discriminant analysis: An experimental study”, Decision Sciences, 19, 322–333.
Keeney, R.L. and Raiffa, H. (1993), Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-offs, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Mardia, K.V. (1975), “Assessment of multinormality and the robustness of Hotelling's T2 test”, Applied Statistics, 24, 163–171.
Mousseau, V. and Slowinski, R. (1998), “Inferring an ELECTRE-TRI model from assignment examples”, Journal of Global Optimization, 12/2, 157–174.
Mousseau, V., Figueira, J. and Naux, J.-Ph. (2001), “Using assignment examples to infer weights for ELECTRE TRI method: Some experimental results”, European Journal of Operational Research, 130/2, 263–275.
Pardalos, P.M., Siskos, Y. and Zopounidis, C. (1995), Advances in Multicriteria Analysis, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
Patuwo, E., Hu, M.Y. and Hung, M.S. (1993), “Two-group classification using neural networks”, Decision Sciences, 24, 825–845.
Pawlak, Z. (1982), “Rough sets”, International Journal of Information and Computer Sciences, 11, 341-356.
Pawlak, Z. and Slowinski, R. (1994), “Rough set approach to multi-attribute decision analysis”, European Journal of Operational Research, 72, 443–459.
Quinlan J.R. (1986), “Induction of decision trees”, Machine Learning, 1, 81–106.
Roy, B. and Moscarola, J. (1977), “Procédure automatique d'examem de dossiers fondée sur une segmentation trichotomique en présence de critères multiples”, RAIRO Recherche Opérationnel, 11/2, 145–173.
Slowinski, R. and Zopounidis, C. (1995), “Application of the rough set approach to evaluation of bankruptcy risk”, International Journal of Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management, 4, 27–41.
Vale, D.C. and Maurelli, V.A. (1983), “Simulating multivariate nonnormal distributions”, Psychometrika, 48/3, 465–471.
Yu, W. (1992), “ELECTRE TRI: Aspects methodologiques et manuel d'utilisation”, Document du Lamsade No 74, Université de Paris-Dauphine, 1992.
Zopounidis, C. and Doumpos, M. (1999), “A multicriteria decision aid methodology for sorting decision problems: The case of financial distress”, Computational Economics, 14/3, 197–218.
Zopounidis, C. and Doumpos, M. (2000), “Building additive utilities for multi—group hierarchical discrimination: The M.H.DIS method”, Optimization Methods and Software, 14/3, 219–240.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2002 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Doumpos, M., Zopounidis, C. (2002). On the Use of Multicriteria Classification Methods: A Simulation Study. In: Bouyssou, D., Jacquet-Lagrèze, E., Perny, P., Słowiński, R., Vanderpooten, D., Vincke, P. (eds) Aiding Decisions with Multiple Criteria. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, vol 44. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0843-4_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0843-4_10
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-5266-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-0843-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive