Skip to main content

On the Use of Multicriteria Classification Methods: A Simulation Study

  • Chapter
Aiding Decisions with Multiple Criteria

Abstract

The classification of a set of alternatives into predefined homogenous groups is a problem with major practical interest in many fields. Over the past two decades several non-parametric approaches have been developed to address the classification problem, originating from several scientific fields. Among these approaches, multicriteria decision aid (MCDA) has several attractive features, involving its decision support orientation. This paper is focused on the preference disaggregation approach of MCDA (PDA). The objective of this study is to explore whether the attractive features of PDA also lead to higher efficiency in terms of classification accuracy, as opposed to traditional statistical classification procedures. For this purpose an extensive Monte Carlo simulation is conducted. The methods considered in this simulation include a well-known classification method based on the PDA paradigm, namely the UTADIS method (UTilités Additives DIScriminantes), and three statistical classification procedures, namely the linear discriminant analysis, the quadratic discriminant analysis and the logit analysis. The results indicate that the UTADIS method outperforms the considered parametric techniques in the majority of the data conditions that are used in the simulation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Altman, E.I., Avery, R., Eisenbeis, R. and Stinkey, J. (1981), Application of Classification Techniques in Business, Banking and Finance, Contemporary Studies in Economic and Financial Analysis, Vol. 3, JAI Press, Greenwich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, T.W. (1958), An Introduction to Multivariate Statistical Analysis, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bajgier, S.M. and Hill, A.V. (1982), “An experimental comparison of statistical and linear programming approaches to the discriminant problem”, Decision Sciences, 13, 604–618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dias, L., Mousseau, V., Figueira, J. and Climaco, J. (2000), “An aggregation/disaggregation approach to obtain robust conclusions with ELECTRE TRI”, Cahier du LAMSADE, No 174, Université de Paris-Dauphine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doumpos, M., Zopounidis, C. and Pardalos, P.M. (2000), “Multicriteria sorting methodology: Application to financial decision problems”, Parallel Algorithms and Applications, 15/1–2, 113–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freed, N. and Glover, F. (1981), “Simple but powerful goal programming models for discriminant problems”, European Journal of Operational Research, 7, 44–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacquet-Lagrèze, E. (1995), “An application of the UTA discriminant model for the evaluation of R & D projects”, in: P.M. Pardalos, Y. Siskos, C. Zopounidis (eds.), Advances in Multicriteria Analysis, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 203–211.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Jacquet-Lagrèze, E. and Siskos, Y. (1982), “Assessing a set of additive utility functions for multicriteria decision making: The UTA method”, European Journal of Operational Research, 10, 151–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacquet-Lagrèze, E. and Siskos, J. (2001), “Preference disaggregation: Twenty years of MCDA experience”, European Journal of Operational Research, 130/2, 233–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joachimsthaler, E.A. and Stam, A. (1988), “Four approaches to the classification problem in discriminant analysis: An experimental study”, Decision Sciences, 19, 322–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keeney, R.L. and Raiffa, H. (1993), Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-offs, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mardia, K.V. (1975), “Assessment of multinormality and the robustness of Hotelling's T2 test”, Applied Statistics, 24, 163–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mousseau, V. and Slowinski, R. (1998), “Inferring an ELECTRE-TRI model from assignment examples”, Journal of Global Optimization, 12/2, 157–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mousseau, V., Figueira, J. and Naux, J.-Ph. (2001), “Using assignment examples to infer weights for ELECTRE TRI method: Some experimental results”, European Journal of Operational Research, 130/2, 263–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pardalos, P.M., Siskos, Y. and Zopounidis, C. (1995), Advances in Multicriteria Analysis, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Patuwo, E., Hu, M.Y. and Hung, M.S. (1993), “Two-group classification using neural networks”, Decision Sciences, 24, 825–845.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pawlak, Z. (1982), “Rough sets”, International Journal of Information and Computer Sciences, 11, 341-356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pawlak, Z. and Slowinski, R. (1994), “Rough set approach to multi-attribute decision analysis”, European Journal of Operational Research, 72, 443–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quinlan J.R. (1986), “Induction of decision trees”, Machine Learning, 1, 81–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy, B. and Moscarola, J. (1977), “Procédure automatique d'examem de dossiers fondée sur une segmentation trichotomique en présence de critères multiples”, RAIRO Recherche Opérationnel, 11/2, 145–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slowinski, R. and Zopounidis, C. (1995), “Application of the rough set approach to evaluation of bankruptcy risk”, International Journal of Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management, 4, 27–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vale, D.C. and Maurelli, V.A. (1983), “Simulating multivariate nonnormal distributions”, Psychometrika, 48/3, 465–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu, W. (1992), “ELECTRE TRI: Aspects methodologiques et manuel d'utilisation”, Document du Lamsade No 74, Université de Paris-Dauphine, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zopounidis, C. and Doumpos, M. (1999), “A multicriteria decision aid methodology for sorting decision problems: The case of financial distress”, Computational Economics, 14/3, 197–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zopounidis, C. and Doumpos, M. (2000), “Building additive utilities for multi—group hierarchical discrimination: The M.H.DIS method”, Optimization Methods and Software, 14/3, 219–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Denis Bouyssou Eric Jacquet-Lagrèze Patrice Perny Roman Słowiński Daniel Vanderpooten Philippe Vincke

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Doumpos, M., Zopounidis, C. (2002). On the Use of Multicriteria Classification Methods: A Simulation Study. In: Bouyssou, D., Jacquet-Lagrèze, E., Perny, P., Słowiński, R., Vanderpooten, D., Vincke, P. (eds) Aiding Decisions with Multiple Criteria. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, vol 44. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0843-4_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0843-4_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-5266-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-0843-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics