Hyper Sensitivity Analysis of Productivity Measurement Problems
In this paper we introduce a method for conducting a Hyper Sensitivity Analysis (HSA) of productivity and efficiency measurement problems. HSA is an intuitive generalization of conventional sensitivity analysis where the term “hyper” indicates that the sensitivity analysis is conducted with respect to functions rather than numeric values. The concept of HSA is suited for situations where several candidates for the function quantifying the utility of (input, output) pairs are available. Both methodological and technical issues arising in the area of multiple criteria productivity measurement in the context of such an analysis are examined.
Keywordshyper sensitivity analysis productivity efficiency DEA multiple objective programming composite concave programming.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Avkiran N.K. Productivity Analysis in the Services Sector with Data Envelopment Analysis. Queensland, Australia: N.K. Avkiran Publishers, 1999Google Scholar
- Bjurek H. Essays on Efficiency and Productivity Change with Applications to Public Service Production. Ekonomiska Studier 52, School of Economics and Commercial Law, University of Gothenburg, 1994Google Scholar
- Bouyssou D. Using DEA as a Tool for MCDM: Some Remarks. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 1999; 50: 974–978Google Scholar
- Byrne A., Sniedovich M., and Churilov L. Handling Soft Constraints via Composite Concave Programming. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 1998; 49: 870–877Google Scholar
- Churilov L. Global Optimization through Composite Linearization. PhD Thesis, Department of Mathematics and Statistics, The University of Melbourne, Australia, 1998Google Scholar
- Churilov L., Bomze I., Sniedovich M., and Ralph D. Hyper Sensitivity Analysis of Portfolio Optimization Problems. Submitted for publication. 1999Google Scholar
- Davis H. Productivity Accounting. USA: The Wharton School Industrial Research Unit, University of Pennsylvania, 1951 (reprint 1978).Google Scholar
- French S. Decision Theory — An Introduction to the Mathematics of Rationality. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1988Google Scholar
- Fried H.O., Knox Lovell C.A., and Schmidt S.S. The Measurement of Productive Efficiency: Techniques and Applications. New York, USA: Oxford University Press, 1993Google Scholar
- Fuentes H., Grifell-Tatje E., and Perelman S. “A Parametric Distance Function Approach for Malmquist Index Estimation”. Working Paper, CREPP 98/03, Centre de Recherche en Economie Publique et en Economie de la Population, Universite de Liege, Belgium, 1998 Google Scholar
- Gal T. Postoptimality Analyses, Parametric Programming and Related Topics. Berlin, Germany: de Gruyter, 1995Google Scholar
- Hillier F.C. and Lieberman G.J. Introduction to Operations Research. 5th edition. New York, USA: McGraw-Hill, 1990Google Scholar
- Schrage L. Optimization Modeling with LINDO. New York: The Scientific Press, 5th edition, 1997Google Scholar
- Sink D.S. Productivity Management: Planning, Measurement and Evaluation, Control and Improvement. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1989.Google Scholar
- Steuer R. Multiple Criteria Optimization: Theory, Computation, and Application. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1986Google Scholar
- Stewart TJ. Relationship between Data Envelopment Analysis and Multicriteria Decision Analysis. Journal of the Operational Research Society 1996; 47: 654–665Google Scholar