Abstract
The Russian crash in August 1998 was followed by several stock market and currency collapses around the world. It was, as Yogi Berrà would say, “déjà vu all over again”. During the Mexican and the Asian crises the markets behaved similarly. In general, these events have been called “contagion”. However, there does not seem to be an agreement on what exactly contagion means.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
King, Mervyn and Sushil Wadhwani. “Transmission of Volatility between Stock Markets.” Review of Financial Studies, pp. 5–33, 1990.
Forbes, Kristin and Roberto Rigobon. “Not Contagion, Only Interdependence: Measuring Stock Market Comovements.” MIT Mimeo, 1998.
This result is known as the Normal Correlation Theorem. The first one to highlight this result (as far as I know) was Rob Stambaugh in a discussion of the paper: Karolyi, Andrew and Rene Stulz. “Why do Market Move Together? An Investigation of US-Japan Stock Return Comovements.” The Journal of Finance, pp. 951–986, 1996.
Rigobon, Roberto. “On the Measurement of the International Propogation of Shocks.” MIT Mimeo, 1999.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2001 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rigobon, R. (2001). Does Contagion Exist?. In: Figlewski, S., Levich, R.M. (eds) Risk Management: The State of the Art. The New York University Salomon Center Series on Financial Markets and Institutions, vol 8. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0791-8_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0791-8_13
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-5241-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-0791-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive