Skip to main content

Prospect for an Economics Framework for Swarm

  • Chapter
Agent-Based Methods in Economics and Finance

Part of the book series: Advances in Computational Economics ((AICE,volume 17))

Abstract

Will the economic agent-based simulation community ever conquer the Tower of Babel effect - and what does it take to succeed in this quest? These are the topics for this paper where it is argued that settling on a common programming language - or even a common platform as Swarm, is not sufficient for reaching a satisfactory level of communication between modelers. With this lack of communication, agent-based simulation models runs the risk of being perceived as onedamned thing after the otherwithout ever accumulating a set of broadly accepted conclusions. A solution to this problem is suggested in the adoption of the framework concept from computer science. A sketch of an application framework for doing economic simulations in Swarm is presented and tested (in a virtual sense) on existing economic Swarm models

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Arthur, W.B., Holland, J.H., LeBaron, B., Palmer, R. and Taylor, P. (1997). Asset Pricing under Endogenous Expectations in an Artificial Stock Market. in The Economy as an Evolving Complex System II. ed. by Arthur, W.B., Durlauf, S. and Lane, D.. Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Askenazi, M, Some Notes on the BankNet Model, available at http://www.santafe.edu/~manor/banknet.html

  • Axelrod, R. (1997). Advancing the Art of Simulation in the Social Sciences, in Simulating Social Phenomena ed. by Conte, R., Hegselmann, R. and Terna, P.. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems 456, Springer 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Axtell, R, Axelrod, R., Epstein, J.M. and Cohen, M.D. (1996). Aligning Simulation Models: A Case Study and Results. In Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory. Vol 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonabeau, E.W., and Theraulaz, G.(1995). Why do we need Artficial Life? In Artificial Life - An overview ed. by Langton, C.G..

    Google Scholar 

  • Brazier, F.M.T., van Eck, P.A.T. and Treur, J. (1997). Modelling a Society of Simple Agents: From Conceptual Specification to Experimentation. In Simulating Social Phenomena ed. by Conte, R., Hegselmann, R. and Terna, P. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems 456, Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Bruderer and Maiers, M. (1997). From the Margin to the Mainstream: An Agenda for Computer Simulations in the Social Sciences. In Simulating Social Phenomena ed. by R. Conte, R., Hegselmann, R. and Terna, P. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems 456, Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruun, C and Luna, F. (2000). Endogenous Growth in a Swarm Economy. In Luna and Stefansson (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  • Corazza, M. and Perrone, A. (2000). Nonlinear Stochastic Dynamics for Supply Counterfeiting in Monopolistic Markets. In Luna and Stefans-son (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  • Erdogmus, H. and Tanir, O. (1999). Developing Frameworks to Support Design Reuse. In Fayad, M.E, Schmidt, D.C., and Johnson, R.E. (1999b).

    Google Scholar 

  • Eriksson, H.E. and Penker, M. (1998). UML Toolkit, Wiley Computer Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fayad, M.E., Schmidt, D.C. and Johnson, R.E. (1999a). Building Application Frameworks - Object-Oriented Foundations of Framework Design. Wiley Computer Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fayad, M.E, Schmidt, D.C. and Johnson, R.E. (1999b). Implementing Application Frameworks - Object-Oriented Frameworks at Work. Wiley Computer Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamma, E., Helm, R., Johnson, R. and Vlissides, J. (1995). Design Patterns: Elements of Reusable Object-Oriented Software. Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gulyàs, L., Kozsik, T. and Corliss, J.B. (1999). The Multi-Agent Modelling Language and the Model Design Interface. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation. Vol 2, No.3, available athttp://www.soc.surrey.ac.uk/JASSS/2/3/8.html.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hjortlund, M. and Zambelli, S. (1998). On the Constitutional Choice of a Democratic Voting Rule: An experimental approach. working paper from department of economics, politics and public administration, Aalborg University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horling, B. and Lesser, V. (1998). A Reusable Component Architecture for Agent Construction. UMass Computer Science Technical Report 98–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huberman, B.A. and Glance, N.S. (1993). Evolutionary Games and Computer Simulations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA 90, pp. 7716–7718.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jares, T.E. (2000). Numerical Modeling, Noise Traders, and the Swarm Simulation System. In Luna and Stefansson (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  • Keynes, J.M. (1939). Professor Tinbergens Method. Economic Journal. Vol 49 pp. 558–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krumpus, M.A. (2000). Overview of the Evo Artificial Life Frameworkhttp://www.omicrongroup.org/evo/.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kutschinski, E., Polani, D. and Uthmann, T.. A Decentralized Agent-Based Platform for Automated Trade and its Simulation. Available at http://nautilus.Informatik.Uni-Mainz.de/~eri

  • Lane, D.A. (1993). Artificial worlds and economics, part 1 and 2. Journal of Evolutionary Economics. Vol 3 pp.89–107 and pp.177–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, F., Strader, T.J. and Shaw, M.J. (2000). Using Swarm for Simulating the Order Fulfillment Frocess in Divergent Assembly Supply Chains. In Luna and Stefansson (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  • Luna, F. and Perrone, A. (2000). The Coevolution of Human Capital and Firm Structure. In Luna and Stefansson (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  • Luna, F. and Stefansson, B. (2000). Economic Simulations in Swarm: Agent-based Modelling and Object Oriented Programming. Advances in Computational Economics Vol 14. Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G.G., McGregor, J. and Major, M.L. (1999). Capturing Framework Requirements. In Fayad et al. (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  • Minar, N., Burkhart, R., Langton, C. and Askenazi, M. (1996). The Swarm Simulation System: A Toolkit for Building Multi-Agent Simulations. Santa Fe Institute Working Paper 96–04–2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mittone, L and Patelli, P. (2000). Imitative Behaviour in Tax Evasion. In Luna and Stefansson (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  • Möhring, M. (1992). Social Science Multilevel Simulation with MIMOSE. University of Koblenz-Landau, Institute of Social Science Informatics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sapienza, M.D. (2000). An Experimental Approach to the Study of Banking Intermediation: the BankNet Simulator. In Luna and Stefansson (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schelling, T.C.(1978). Micromotives and Macrobehaviour. W.W.Norton and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlueter-Langdon, C., Bruhn, P, Shaw, M.J.: 2000 “Online Supply Chain Modeling and Simulation. In Luna and Stefansson (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stefansson, B. (1997). Swarm: An Object Oriented Simulation Platform Applied to Markets and Organizations. In Evolutionary Programming VI ed. by Angeline, P., Reynolds, R., McDonnell, J. and Eberhart, R. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Vol. 1213, Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stefansson, B. (2000). Simulating Economic Agents in Swarm. In Luna and Stefansson (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  • Terna, P. (1998). Simulation Tools for Social Scientists: Building Agent Based Models with SWARM. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation. Vol 1 No. 2http://www.soc.surrey.ac.uk/JASSS/1//2/4.html

    Google Scholar 

  • Terna, P. (2000). Economic Experiments with Swarm: a Neural Network Approach to the Self-Development of Consistency in Agents Behavior. In Luna and Stefansson (2000).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bruun, C. (2002). Prospect for an Economics Framework for Swarm. In: Luna, F., Perrone, A. (eds) Agent-Based Methods in Economics and Finance. Advances in Computational Economics, vol 17. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0785-7_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0785-7_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-5238-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-0785-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics