Skip to main content
  • 99 Accesses

Abstract

The US retirement income system relies on two big pillars: on the one hand the public Old-age, Survivors and Disability Insurance (OASDI), also called “social security”, and on the other hand private pension arrangements. The social security system is based on the insurance principle. Social security is not trivial, as it covers approximately 96 per cent of jobs in the US. Coverage has expanded quite rapidly and social security spending as a share of GDP has doubled between 1970 and 2000. Benefit payments in 1996 represented US$305.2 billion1, or approximately 4.59 per cent of US GDP. In 1994 91 per cent of elderly households received social security income. In 1996 43.7 million people received monthly benefits. But also at the individual level social security represents a major income source. Calculations from Diamond and Gruber (1999) illustrate that for 16 per cent of households social security represents the only source of income. Furthermore social security represents more than 50 per cent of income for three-fifths of the beneficiaries aged 65 or older. None the less the system is distinctly smaller in size than its counterparts in most continental European countries. In Germany for example the public retirement systems accounted for approximately 13 per cent of GDP in 1995. In Belgium the figure was approximately 10.6 per cent for the same year.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Advisory Council on Social Security (1997). Report of the 1994–1996 Advisory Council on Social Security, Volume I: Findings and Recommendations, Washington, DC, US Department of Health and Human Services, Social Security Administration, Advisory Council. This document can be found on the web at http://www.ssa.gov/history/reports/adcouncil/report/toc.htm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bound, J. (1989). “The Health and Earnings of Rejected Disability Insurance Applicants”, American Economic Review, 79 (3), 482–503.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bound, J. (1991). “The Health and Earnings of Rejected Disability Insurance Applicants: Reply”, American Economic Review, 81 (5), 1427–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, P. and J. Gruber (1999). “Social Security and Retirement in the US”, in J. Gruber and D.A. Wise (eds), Social Security and Retirement around the World, Chicago, Chicago University Press for National Bureau of Economic Research, 437–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • EBRI (1995). EBRI Databook on Employee Benefits, 3rd edition, Washington, DC, Employee Benefit Research Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • EBRI (1997). EBRI Databook on Employee Benefits, 4th edition, Washington, DC, Employee Benefit Research Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Executive Office of the President (1997). Economic Report of the President, February, Washington, DC, US Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldstein, M. (ed.) (1999). Privatizing Social Security, Chicago, Chicago University Press for National Bureau of Economic Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruber, J. and D.A. Wise (eds) (1999). Social Security and Retirement around the World, Chicago, Chicago University Press for National Bureau of Economic Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gustman, A. and T. Steinmeier (1992). “The Stampede Towards defined Contribution Pension Plans: Fact or Fiction?”, Industrial Relations, 32 (2), 3619.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, R. and J. Skinner (1999). “Will Aging Baby Boomers bust the Federal Budget?”, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 13 (1), 11740.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leimer, D.R. (1994). “Cohort-Specific Measures of Lifetime Net Social Security Transfers”, Social Security Administration, Office of Research and Statistics, Working Paper 59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leimer, D.R. (1995). “A Guide to Social Security Money’s Worth Issues”, Social Security Administration, Office of Research and Statistics, Working Paper 67.

    Google Scholar 

  • OASDI Trustee Report (1997). Annual Report of the Board of the Federal Old-Age and Survivors Insurance and Disability Insurance Trust Funds, US Department of Health and Human Services, Social Security Administration, Office of the Chief Actuary, Washington, DC, US Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, D. (1991). “The Health and Earnings of Rejected Disability Insurance Applicants: Comment”, American Economic Review, 81 (5), 1419–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roseveare, D., W. Leibfritz, D. Fore and F. Wurzel (1996), “Ageing Populations, Pension Systems and Government Budgets: Simulations for 26 OECD Countries”, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Economics Department, Working Paper 168.

    Google Scholar 

  • US Bureau of Labor Statistics (various years), Employment and Earnings, Washington, DC, US Bureau of Labor Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • US Congress (1996). Green Book: Background Material and Data on Programs within the Jurisdiction of the Committee on Ways and Means, House of Representatives, Committee on Ways and Means, Washington, DC, US Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • US Department of Labor (1997). Private Pension Plan Bulletin: Abstract of 1993 Form 5500 Annual Reports, Washington, DC, Pension and Welfare Benefit Administration.

    Google Scholar 

  • US Department of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service (various years). Statistics of Income Bulletin, Winter 1984–1985,1986–1987,1990–1991, 1993–1994 and Summer 1994, Washington, DC, US Department of the Treasury.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Jousten, A. (2002). Pension Provision in The United States. In: D’Aspremont, C., Ginsburgh, V., Sneessens, H., Spinnewyn, F. (eds) Institutional and Financial Incentives for Social Insurance. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0783-3_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0783-3_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-5237-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-0783-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics