Abstract
The US retirement income system relies on two big pillars: on the one hand the public Old-age, Survivors and Disability Insurance (OASDI), also called “social security”, and on the other hand private pension arrangements. The social security system is based on the insurance principle. Social security is not trivial, as it covers approximately 96 per cent of jobs in the US. Coverage has expanded quite rapidly and social security spending as a share of GDP has doubled between 1970 and 2000. Benefit payments in 1996 represented US$305.2 billion1, or approximately 4.59 per cent of US GDP. In 1994 91 per cent of elderly households received social security income. In 1996 43.7 million people received monthly benefits. But also at the individual level social security represents a major income source. Calculations from Diamond and Gruber (1999) illustrate that for 16 per cent of households social security represents the only source of income. Furthermore social security represents more than 50 per cent of income for three-fifths of the beneficiaries aged 65 or older. None the less the system is distinctly smaller in size than its counterparts in most continental European countries. In Germany for example the public retirement systems accounted for approximately 13 per cent of GDP in 1995. In Belgium the figure was approximately 10.6 per cent for the same year.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Advisory Council on Social Security (1997). Report of the 1994–1996 Advisory Council on Social Security, Volume I: Findings and Recommendations, Washington, DC, US Department of Health and Human Services, Social Security Administration, Advisory Council. This document can be found on the web at http://www.ssa.gov/history/reports/adcouncil/report/toc.htm.
Bound, J. (1989). “The Health and Earnings of Rejected Disability Insurance Applicants”, American Economic Review, 79 (3), 482–503.
Bound, J. (1991). “The Health and Earnings of Rejected Disability Insurance Applicants: Reply”, American Economic Review, 81 (5), 1427–31.
Diamond, P. and J. Gruber (1999). “Social Security and Retirement in the US”, in J. Gruber and D.A. Wise (eds), Social Security and Retirement around the World, Chicago, Chicago University Press for National Bureau of Economic Research, 437–74.
EBRI (1995). EBRI Databook on Employee Benefits, 3rd edition, Washington, DC, Employee Benefit Research Institute.
EBRI (1997). EBRI Databook on Employee Benefits, 4th edition, Washington, DC, Employee Benefit Research Institute.
Executive Office of the President (1997). Economic Report of the President, February, Washington, DC, US Government Printing Office.
Feldstein, M. (ed.) (1999). Privatizing Social Security, Chicago, Chicago University Press for National Bureau of Economic Research.
Gruber, J. and D.A. Wise (eds) (1999). Social Security and Retirement around the World, Chicago, Chicago University Press for National Bureau of Economic Research.
Gustman, A. and T. Steinmeier (1992). “The Stampede Towards defined Contribution Pension Plans: Fact or Fiction?”, Industrial Relations, 32 (2), 3619.
Lee, R. and J. Skinner (1999). “Will Aging Baby Boomers bust the Federal Budget?”, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 13 (1), 11740.
Leimer, D.R. (1994). “Cohort-Specific Measures of Lifetime Net Social Security Transfers”, Social Security Administration, Office of Research and Statistics, Working Paper 59.
Leimer, D.R. (1995). “A Guide to Social Security Money’s Worth Issues”, Social Security Administration, Office of Research and Statistics, Working Paper 67.
OASDI Trustee Report (1997). Annual Report of the Board of the Federal Old-Age and Survivors Insurance and Disability Insurance Trust Funds, US Department of Health and Human Services, Social Security Administration, Office of the Chief Actuary, Washington, DC, US Government Printing Office.
Parsons, D. (1991). “The Health and Earnings of Rejected Disability Insurance Applicants: Comment”, American Economic Review, 81 (5), 1419–26.
Roseveare, D., W. Leibfritz, D. Fore and F. Wurzel (1996), “Ageing Populations, Pension Systems and Government Budgets: Simulations for 26 OECD Countries”, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Economics Department, Working Paper 168.
US Bureau of Labor Statistics (various years), Employment and Earnings, Washington, DC, US Bureau of Labor Statistics.
US Congress (1996). Green Book: Background Material and Data on Programs within the Jurisdiction of the Committee on Ways and Means, House of Representatives, Committee on Ways and Means, Washington, DC, US Government Printing Office.
US Department of Labor (1997). Private Pension Plan Bulletin: Abstract of 1993 Form 5500 Annual Reports, Washington, DC, Pension and Welfare Benefit Administration.
US Department of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service (various years). Statistics of Income Bulletin, Winter 1984–1985,1986–1987,1990–1991, 1993–1994 and Summer 1994, Washington, DC, US Department of the Treasury.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2002 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Jousten, A. (2002). Pension Provision in The United States. In: D’Aspremont, C., Ginsburgh, V., Sneessens, H., Spinnewyn, F. (eds) Institutional and Financial Incentives for Social Insurance. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0783-3_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0783-3_6
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-5237-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-0783-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive