Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Cross-Cultural Equivalence of the Big Five

A Tentative Interpretation of the Evidence

  • Chapter
The Five-Factor Model of Personality Across Cultures

Part of the book series: International and Cultural Psychology Series ((ICUP))

Abstract

This chapter examines cross-cultural evidence on the Five-Factor Model (Big Five dimensions) and other dimensional representations of personality (like the Eysenck model) in the light of distinctions between various forms of psychometric equivalence. In the first section we give an overview of types of inequivalence and associated forms of cultural bias. In the following three sections we look at evidence concerning three categories: structural equivalence, metric equivalence, and full score equivalence. Dimensions of personality replicate reasonably well across cultures. However, metric and full score equivalence are questionable. In a final section we discuss implications for trait theory. The findings of structural equivalence suggest that a common set of dimensions may reach across cultures to represent personality. The absence of empirical evidence for equivalence in score patterns and levels of scores makes the interpretation of quantitative cross-cultural differences on the dimensions rather tentative.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Avia, M. D., Sanz, J., Sánchez-Bernardos, M. L., Martínez-Arias, M. R., Silva, F., & Graña, J. L. (1995). The Five-Factor Model — II. Relations of the NEO-PI with other personality variables. Personality and Individual Differences, 19, 81–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, P. T. (1999). Rejoinder to: The Eysenckian personality structure: A ‘Giant Three’ or ‘Big Five’ model in Hong Kong? Personality and Individual Differences, 26, 175–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, P. T., Petrides, K. V., Eysenck, S. B. G., & Eysenck, H. J. (1998). The Eysenck Personality Questionnaire: An examination of the factorial similarity of P, E, N, and L across 34 countries. Personality and Individual Differences, 25, 805–819.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, D. (1976). The cultural contradictions of capitalism. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, J. W. (1976). Human ecology and cognitive style: Comparative studies in cultural and psychological adaptation. New York: Sage/Halsted.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, J. W., Poortinga, Y. H., Segall, M. H., & Dasen, P. R. (in press). Cross-cultural psychology: Research and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bijnen, E. J., Poortinga, Y. H., & Van der Net, T. Z. J. (1986). On cross-cultural comparative studies with the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 17, 3–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  •  Bond, R., & Smith, P. B. (1996). Culture and conformity: A meta-analysis of studies using Asch’s line judgment task. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 111–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caprara, G. V., Barbaranelli, C, Bermudez, J., Maslach, C, & Ruch, W. (2000). Multivariate methods for the comparison of factor structures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 31, 437–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan W., Ho, R. M., Leung, K., Chan, D. K.-S., & Yung, Y.-F. (1999). An alternative method for evaluating congruence coefficients with Procrustes rotation: A bootstrap procedure. Psychological Methods, 4, 378–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, F. M., & Leung, K. (1998). Indigenous personality measures: Chinese examples. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 29, 233–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, F. M., Leung, K., Zang, J. X., Sun, H. F., Gan, Y. Q., Song, W. Z., & Xie D. (2001). Indigenous Chinese personality constructs: Is the Five-Factor Model complete? Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32, 407–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Church, A. T. (2000). Culture and personality: Toward an integrated cultural trait psychology. Journal of Personality, 68, 651–703.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Church, A. T., & Katigbak, M. S. (2002). The Five-Factor Model in the Philippines: Investigating trait structure and levels across cultures. In R. R. McCrae & J. Allik (Eds.), The Five-Factor Model of personality across cultures (pp. 129–154). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1995). Primary traits of Eysenck’s P-E-N system: Three and five-factor solutions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 308–317.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, L. J., Gleser, G. C, Nanda, H., & Rajaratnam, N. (1972). The dependability of behavioral measurements. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Raad, B., Perugini, M., Hřebíčková, M., & Szarota, P. (1998). Lingua Franca of personality: Taxonomies and structures based on the psycholexical approach. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 29, 212–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y S. (Eds.). (2000). Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diaz-Guerrero, R. (1993). Mexican ethnopsychology. In U. Kim & J. W. Berry (Eds.), Indigenous psychologies: Research and experience in cultural context (pp. 44–55). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., Diener, M., & Diener, C. (1995). Factors predicting the subjective well-being of nations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 851–864.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  •  Draycott, S. G., & Kline, P. (1995). The Big Three and the Big Five—the EPQ-R vs. the NEO-PI: A research note, replication and elaboration. Personality and Individual Differences, 18, 801–804.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eibl-Eibesfeldt, J. (1989). Human ethology. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enriquez, V. G. (Ed.). (1990). Indigenous psychologies. Quezon City, The Philippines: Psychology Research and Training House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eysenck, H. J., & Eysenck, S. B. G. (1975). Manual of the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire. London: Hodder and Stoughton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furby, L. (1973). Implications of within-group heritabilities for sources of between-group differences: IQ and racial differences. Developmental Psychology, 9, 28–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Georgas, J., Van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Berry, J. W. (2002). Ecosocial indicators and psychological variables in cross-cultural research. Unpublished manuscript, University of Athens, Greece.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, H. (1987). Multilevel models in educational and social research. London: Griffin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gough, H. G., & Heilbrun, A. B. (1983). The Adjective Check List (1983 ed.). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guanzon-Lapeña, M. A., Church, A. T., Carlota, A. J., & Katigbak, M. S. (1998). Indigenous personality measures: Philippine examples. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 29, 249–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gülgöz, S. (2002). Five-Factor Theory and the NEO-PI-R in Turkey. In R. R. McCrae & J. Allik (Eds.), The Five-Factor Model of personality across cultures (pp. 175–196). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequences. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences (2nd ed.). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland, P. W., & Wainer, H. (Eds.). (1993). Differential item functioning. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hřebíčková, M., Urbánek, T., Čermák, I., Szarota, P., Ficková, E., & Orlická, L. (2002). The NEO Five-Factor Inventory in Czech, Polish, and Slovak contexts. In R. R. McCrae & J. Allik (Eds.), The Five-Factor Model of personality across cultures (pp. 53–78). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, C. D., Church, A. T., Katigbak, M. S. (1997). Identifying cultural differences in items and traits: Differential item functioning in the NEO Personality Inventory. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 28, 192–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inglehart, R., & Baker, W. E. (2000). Modernization, cultural change, and the persistence of traditional values. American Sociological Review, 65, 19–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kallasmaa, T., Allik, J., Realo, A., & McCrae, R. R. (2000). The Estonian version of the NEO-PI-R: An examination of universal and culture-specific aspects of the Five-Factor Model. European Journal of Personality, 14, 265–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katigbak, M. S., Church, A. T., & Akamine, T. X. (1996). Cross-cultural generalizability of personality dimensions: Relating indigenous and imported dimensions in two cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 99–114.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Konstabel, K., Realo, A., & Kallasmaa, T. (2002). Exploring the sources of variations in the structure of personality traits across cultures. In R. R. McCrae & J. Allik (Eds.), The Five-Factor Model of personality across cultures (pp. 29–52). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Leininger, A. (2002). Vietnamese-American personality and acculturation: An exploration of relationships between personality traits and cultural goals. In R. R. McCrae & J. Allik (Eds.), The Five-Factor Model of personality across cultures (pp. 197–225). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Leung, K., & Bond, M. H. (1989). On the empirical identification of dimensions for cross-cultural comparison. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 20, 133–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lima, M. P. (2002). Personality and culture: The Portuguese case. In R. R. McCrae & J. Allik (Eds.), The Five-Factor Model of personality across cultures (pp. 249–260). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishing.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lynn, R., & Martin, T. (1995). National differences for thirty-seven nations in extra version, neuroticism, psychoticism and economic, demographic and other correlates. Personality and Individual Differences, 19, 403–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, T. A., Costa, P. T., Jr., Oryol, V. E., Rukavishnikov, A. A., & Senin, I. G. (2002). Applications of the Russian NEO-PI-R. In R. R. McCrae & J. Allik (Eds.), The Five-Factor Model of personality across cultures (pp. 261–277). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H. W., & Byrne, B. M. (1993). Confirmatory factor analysis of multigroup-multimethod self-concept data: Between-group and within-group invariance constraints. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 28, 313–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCrae, R. R. (2000). Trait psychology and the revival of personality and culture studies. American Behavioral Scientist, 44, 10–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCrae, R. R. (2001). Trait psychology and culture: Exploring intercultural comparisons. Journal of Personality, 69, 819–846.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McCrae, R. R. (2002). NEO-PI-R data from 36 cultures: Further intercultural comparisons. In R. R. McCrae & J. Allik (Eds.), The Five-Factor Model of personality across cultures (pp. 105–126). New York: Kluwer Academic/ Plenum Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T., Jr. (1983). Social desirability scales: More substance than style. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 51, 882–888.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T., Jr. (1985). Comparison of EPI and Psychoticism scales with measures of the Five-Factor Model of personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 6, 587–597.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T., Jr. (1996). Toward a new generation of personality theories: Theoretical contexts for the Five-Factor Model. In J. S. Wiggins (Ed.), The Five-Factor Model of Personality: Theoretical perspectives (pp. 51–87). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCrae, R. R., Yik, M. S. M., Trapnell, P. D., Bond, M. H., & Paulhus, D. L. (1998). Interpreting personality profiles across cultures: Bilingual, acculturation, and peer rating studies of Chinese undergraduates. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1041–1055.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McCrae, R. R., Zonderman, A. B., Costa, P. T., Jr., Bond, M. H., & Paunonen, S. V. (1996). Evaluating replicability of factors in the Revised NEO Personality Inventory: Confirmatory factor analysis versus Procrustes rotation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 522–566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merritt, A. (2000). Culture in the cockpit: Do Hofstede’s dimensions replicate? Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 31, 283–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J. G. (1997). Theoretical issues in cultural psychology. In J. W. Berry, Y. H. Poortinga, & J. Pandey (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology (2nd ed., Vol. 1, pp. 85–128). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muthén, B. O. (1991). Multilevel factor analysis of class and student achievement components. Journal of Educational Measurement, 28, 338–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pande, N., & Naidu, R. K. (1992). Anasakti and health: A study of non-attachment. Psychology and Developing Societies, 4, 91–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paunonen, S. V., & Ashton, M. C. (1998). The structured assessment of personality across cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 29, 150–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piedmont, R. L., Bain, E., McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T., Jr. (2002). The applicability of the Five-Factor Model in a Sub-Saharan culture: The NEO-PI-R in Shona. In R. R. McCrae & J. Allik (Eds.), The Five-Factor Model of personality across cultures (pp. 155–174). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Plomin, R., & Caspi, A. (1998). DNA and personality. European Journal of Personality, 12, 387–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plomin, R., DeFries, J. C, & McClearn, G. E. (1997). Behavioral genetics: A primer (3rd. ed.). New York: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poortinga, Y. H. (1971). Cross-cultural comparison of maximum performance tests: Some methodological aspects and some experiments. Psychologia Africana, Monograph Supplement, No. 6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poortinga, Y. H. (1989). Equivalence of cross-cultural data: An overview of basic issues. International Journal of Psychology, 24, 737–756.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Poortinga, Y. H. (2001, April). Coherence of culture and generalizability of data: Two questionable assumptions in cross-cultural psychology. Invited address, Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, Lincoln, Nebraska.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poortinga, Y. H., & Girndt, T. (1996). Gibt es einen Nationalcharakter? [Does national character exist?] In H. Süssmuth (Ed.), Deutschlandbilder in Dänemark und England, in Frankreich und den Niederlanden (pp. 124–139). Baden-Baden: Nomos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poortinga, Y. H., & Malpass, R. S. (1986). Making inferences from cross-cultural data. In W. J. Lonner & J. W. Berry (Eds.), Field methods in cross-cultural research (pp. 17–46). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poortinga, Y. H., & Van de Vijver, F. J. R. (1987). Explaining cross-cultural differences: Bias analysis and beyond. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 18, 259–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poortinga Y. H., & Van Hemert, D. A. (2001). Personality and culture: Demarcating between the common and the unique. Journal of Personality, 69, 1033–1060.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Poortinga, Y. H., Van de Vijver, F. J. R., Joe, R. C, & Van de Koppel, J. M. H. (1987). Peeling the onion called culture. In Ç. Kagitçibaşi (Ed.), Growth and progress in cross-cultural psychology (pp. 22–34). Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Przeworski, A., & Teune, H. (1970). The logic of comparative social inquiry. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rolland, J.-P. (2002). Cross-cultural generalizability of the Five-Factor Model of personality. In R. R. McCrae & J. Allik (Eds.), The Five-Factor Model of personality across cultures (pp. 7–28). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  •  Saggino, A. (2000). The Big Three or the Big Five? A replication study. Personality and Individual Differences, 28, 879–886.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saucier, G. & Goldberg, L. R. (2001). Lexical studies of indigenous personality factors: Premises, products, and prospects. Journal of Personality, 69, 847–880.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Segall, M. H., Dasen, P. R., Berry, J. W., & Poortinga, Y. H. (1999). Human behavior in global perspective: An introduction to cross-cultural psychology (2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shweder, R. A., & Bourne, E. J. (1984). Does the concept of the person vary cross-culturally? In R. A. Shweder & R. LeVine (Eds.) Culture theory (pp. 158–199). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinha, D. (1997). Indigenizing psychology. In J. W. Berry, Y. H. Poortinga, & J. Pandey (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology. Vol. 1. Theory and method (2nd ed., pp. 129–169). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Triandis, H. C. (1995). Individualism and collectivism. Boulder, CO: Westview.

    Google Scholar 

  • Triandis, H. C. (1996). The psychological measurement of cultural syndromes. American Psychologist, 51, 407–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Triandis, H. C, & Vassiliou, V. (1972). A comparative analysis of subjective culture. In H. C. Triandis (Ed.), The analysis of subjective culture (pp. 299–335). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Leung, K. (1997a). Methods and data analysis of comparative research. In J. W. Berry, Y. H. Poortinga, & J. Pandey (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology. Vol 1. Theory and method (pp. 257–300). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Leung, K. (1997b). Methods and data analysis for cross-cultural research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Leung, K. (2001). Personality in cultural context: Methodological issues. Journal of Personality, 69, 1007–1032.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Poortinga, Y. H. (2002). Structural equivalence in multicultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 33, 141–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van de Vijver, F. J. R. (1994) Methodological issues in cross-cultural studies on parental rearing behavior and psychopathology. In C. Perris, W. A. Arrindell, & M. Eisemann (Eds.), Parenting and psychopathology (pp. 173–197). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Tanzer, N. K. (1997). Bias and equivalence in cross-cultural assessment: An overview. European Review of Applied Psychology, 47, 263–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Hemert, D. A., Van de Vijver, F. J. R., Poortinga, Y. H., & Georgas, J. (in press). Structure and score levels of the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire across individuals and countries. Personality and Individual Differences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J. E., Satterwhite, R. C., & Saiz, J. L. (1998). The importance of psychological traits: A cross-cultural study. New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zegers, F. E., & ten Berge, J. M. F. (1985). A family of association coefficients for metric scales. Psycho-metrika, 50, 17–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Tilburg University, the Netherlands

    Ype H. Poortinga, Fons J. R. Van De Vijver & Dianne A. Van Hemert

  2. Catholic University of Leuven, Belgium

    Ype H. Poortinga

Authors
  1. Ype H. Poortinga
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Fons J. R. Van De Vijver
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Dianne A. Van Hemert
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. National Institute on Aging, Baltimore, Maryland, USA

    Robert R. McCrae

  2. University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia

    Jüri Allik

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Poortinga, Y.H., Van De Vijver, F.J.R., Van Hemert, D.A. (2002). Cross-Cultural Equivalence of the Big Five. In: McCrae, R.R., Allik, J. (eds) The Five-Factor Model of Personality Across Cultures. International and Cultural Psychology Series. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0763-5_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0763-5_14

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-306-47355-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-0763-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation