The Synaptic Linkage for Tactile and Kinaesthetic Inputs to the Dorsal Column Nuclei

  • Mark J. Rowe
Part of the Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology book series (AEMB, volume 508)


Our sensory abilities in touch and kinaesthesia depend upon approximately eight major classes of receptors and sensory nerve fibres. Whenindividualfibres of these different kinaesthetic and tactile fibre classes are selectively activated in conscious human subjects by means of the intraneural microstimulation procedure there are quite marked differences observed among the classes in their capacity to generate perceptual responses. These differences may be attributable to differential transmission characteristics for different fibre classes at synaptic junctions within the sensory pathways. To test this hypothesis we have employed a paired, simultaneous recording paradigm in which we have examined the efficacy of transmission across the dorsal column nuclei (DCN) in a one-to-one synaptic linkage between single, identified tactile or kinaesthetic afferent fibres and their central DCN target neurons. These studies demonstrate a remarkable security of transmission for all fibre classes examined. For all classes, the minimum sensory input, a single impulse in one sensory fibre, can generate spike output from DCN target neurons. The results demonstrate that the differential capacities of various tactile and kinaesthetic fibre classes to generate perceptual responses when activated singly, do not appear to be explicable in terms of systematic differences in DCN transmission characteristics.


Afferent Fibre Transmission Characteristic Perceptual Response Vibratory Stimulus Muscle Spindle Afferents 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Coleman, G. T., Zhang, H. Q., Mackie, P. D., and Rowe, M. J., 1998, An intact peripheral nerve preparation for examining the central actions of single kinaesthetic afferent fibres arising in the wrist jointPrimary Sensory Neuron3, 61–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Coleman, G. T., Bahramali, H., Zhang, H. Q. and Rowe, M. J., 2001, Characterization of tactile afferent fibers in the hand of the marmoset monkeyJournal of Neurophysiology85, 1793–1804.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Edin, B. B., and Abbs, J. H., 1991, Finger movement responses of cutaneous mechanoreceptors in the dorsal skin of the human handJournal of Neurophysiology65, 657–670.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Ferrington, D. G. and Rowe, Mark J., 1980, Functional capacities of tactile afferent fibres in neonatal kittensJournal of Physiology307, 335–353.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Ferrington, D. G., Rowe, M. J., and Tarvin, R. P., 1987a, Actions of single sensory fibres on cat dorsal column nuclei neurones: vibratory signalling in a one-to-one linkageJournal of Physiology386, 293–309.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Ferrington, D. G., Rowe, M. J., afid Tarvin, R. P., 1987b, Integrative processing of vibratory information in cat dorsal column nuclei neurones driven by identified sensory fibresJournal of Physiology386, 311–331.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Gandevia, S. C., and McCloskey, D. I., 1976, Joint sense, muscle sense, and their combination as position sense, measured at the distal interphalangeal joint of the middle fingerJournal of Physiology260, 387–407.Google Scholar
  8. Gynther, B. D., Vickery, R. M., and Rowe, M. J., 1995, Transmission characteristics for the 1:1 linkage between slowly adapting type II fibers and their cuneate target neurons in catExperimental Brain Research105, 67–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Iggo, A., and Ogawa, H., 1977, Correlative physiological and morphological studies of rapidly adapting mechanoreceptors in cat’s glabrous skinJournal of Physiology266, 275–296.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Janig, W., Schmidt, R. F., and Zimmermann, M., 1968, Single unit responses and the total afferent outflow from the cat’s foot pad upon mechanical stimulationExperimental Brain Research6, 100–115.Google Scholar
  11. Johansson, R. S., and Vallbo, A. B., 1979, Detection of tactile stimuli, Thresholds of afferent units related to psychophysical thresholds in the human handJournal of Physiology297, 405–422.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Macefield, G., Gandevia, S. C., and Burke, D., 1990, Perceptual responses to microstimulation of single afferents innervating joints, muscles and skin of the human handJournal of Physiology429, 113–129.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Mackie, P. D., and Rowe, M.J., 1997, An intact peripheral nerve preparation for monitoring inputs from single muscle afferent fibresExperimental Brain Research113, 186–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. McCloskey, D. I., 1978, Kinesthetic sensibilityPhysiological Reviews58, 763–820.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Ni, S., Wilson, L.R., Burke, D., and Gandevia S., 1998, Microneurographic stimulation of muscle spindle afferents in the radial nerve fails to elicit proprioceptive sensationProceedings of the Australian Neuroscience Society9, 183.Google Scholar
  16. Ochoa, J., and Torebjork, E., 1983, Sensations evoked by intraneural microstimulation of single mechanoreceptor units innervating the human handJournal of Physiology342, 633–654.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Rowe, M. J., 1990, Impulse patteming in central neurons for vibrotactile coding, in:Information Processing in Mammalian Auditory and Tactile SystemsRowe, M. J., and Aitkin, L.M., ed., Wiley-Liss, New York, pp. 111–125.Google Scholar
  18. Rowe, M.J., 2001, Security of central tranmission for individual tactile and kinaesthetic sensory nerve fibres, in:Somatosensory Processing: from Single Neuron to Brain ImagingRowe, M.J., and Iwamura, Y., ed., Harwood Academic, Sydney, pp. 77–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Talbot, W. H., Darian-Smith, I., Komhuber, H. H., and Mountcastle, V. B., 1968, The sense of flutter-vibration: comparison of the human capacity with response patterns of mechanoreceptive afferents from the monkey handJournal of Neurophysiology31, 301–334.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Vallbo, A. B., and Hagbarth, K. E., 1968, Activity from skin mechanoreceptors recorded percutaneously in awake human subjectsExperimental Neurology21, 270–289.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Vallbo, A. B., and Johansson, R. S., 1984, Properties of cutaneous mechanoreceptors in the human hand related to touch sensationHuman Neurobiology3, 3–14.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Vallbo, A. B., Olsson, K. A., Westberg, K. G., and Clark, F. J., 1984, Microstimulation of single tactile afferents from the human hand: Sensory attributes related to unit type and properties of receptive fieldsBrain107, 727–749.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Vickery, R. M., Gynther, B. D., and Rowe, M. J., 1994, Synaptic transmission between single slowly adapting type I fibres and their cuneate target neurones in catJournal of Physiology474, 379–392.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Zachariah, M. K., Coleman, G. T., Mahns, D. A., Zhang, H. Q., arid Rowe, M. J., 2001, Transmission security for single, hair follicle-associated tactile afferent fibres and their target cuneate neurones in the catJournal of Neurophysiology86, 900–911.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mark J. Rowe
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Physiology and PharmacologyUniversity of New South WalesSydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations