Advertisement

Reward-Based Planning of Motor Selection in the Rostral Cingulate Motor Area

  • Jun Tanji
  • Keisetu Shima
  • Yoshiya Matsuzaka
Part of the Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology book series (AEMB, volume 508)

Abstract

The cingulate motor areas, located in the banks of the cingulate sulcus, constitute a portion of the cingulate cortex of primates. We here present experimental evidence showing that the rostral cingulate motor area (CMAr), but not the caudal one (CMAc) is crucial for the selection of future movements based on reward information. After muscimol injection into the CMAr, monkeys were impaired in selecting movements appropriately on the basis of the amount of reward obtained by performing correct movements. Furthermore, four types of cells in the CMAr were found to reflect a process intervening between detection of reward alteration and selection of a future movement. Each type of cell seems to be involved in responding to the quality of the reward, and to relay that information to change planned movements, and prepare a new movement.

Keywords

Motor Area Supplementary Motor Area Correct Movement Tone Signal Comparative Neurology 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Mateili, M., Luppino, G., and Rizzolatti, G., 1991, Architecture of superior and mesial area 6 and the adjacent Cingulate cortex in the macaque monkeyJournal of Comparative Neurology311, 445–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Matsuzaka, Y., and Tanji, J., 1996, Changing directions of forthcoming arm movements: neuronal activity in the presupplementary and supplementary motor area of monkey cerebral cortexJournal of Neurophysiology76, 2327–2342.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Morecraft, R. J., Geula, C., and Mesulam, M. M., 1993, Architecture of connectivity within a cingulo-frontoparietal Neurocognitive network for directed attentionArchives of Neurolog50, 279–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Morecraft, R. J., and Van-Hoesen, G.W., 1993, Frontal granular cortex input to the cingulate (M3), supplementary (M2) and primary (M 1) motor corteices in the rhesus monkeyJournal of Comparative Neurology337, 669–689.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Picard, N., and Strick, P. L., 1996, Motor areas of the medial wall: a review of their location and functional activationCerebral Cortex6, 342–353.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Shima, K., Aya, K., Mushiake, H., Inase, M., Aizawa, H., and Tanji, J., 1991, Two movement-related foci in the primate cingulate cortex observed in signal-triggered and self-paced forelimb movementsJournal of Neurophysiology65, 188–202.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Shima, K., and Tanji, J., 1998, Role for cingulate motor area cells in voluntary movement selection based on RewardScience282, 1335–1338.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Tanji, J., 1996, New concepts of the supplementary motor area, Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 6, 782–787.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Vogt, B. A., and Gabriel, M., 1993Neurobiology of Cingulate Cortex and Limbic ThalamusBirkhauser, Boston, USA.Google Scholar
  10. Vogt, B. A, Pandya, D. N., and Rosene, D. L., 1987, Cingulate cortex of the rhesus monkey: I. Cytoarchitecture and Thalamic afferentsJournal of Comparative Neurology262, 256–270.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jun Tanji
    • 1
    • 2
  • Keisetu Shima
    • 1
  • Yoshiya Matsuzaka
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PhysiologyTohoku University School of MedicineSendaiJapan
  2. 2.CRESTKawaguchiJapan

Personalised recommendations