Advertisement

Give Proprioceptors a Chance

  • Anthony Taylor
Chapter
Part of the Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology book series (AEMB, volume 508)

Abstract

The theme of this review is that it is inappropriate to regard proprioceptors as general purpose transducers of system variables associated with movements. We should not try to describe their properties by general expressions derived by testing with a wide range of externally applied disturbances, in the way that is customary in engineering practice. Instead, if study is concentrated on their behaviour during natural active movements such as locomotion, then the significance of the signals which they feed back to the CNS is much easier to understand. This idea is developed briefly for tendon organs, and then in more detail for muscle spindles in locomotion.

Keywords

Tibialis Anterior Muscle Spindle Medial Gastrocnemius Muscle Length Primary Afferents 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Andersson, B. F., Lennerstrand, G., and Thoden, U., 1968, Response characteristics of muscle spindle endings at constant length to variations in fusimotor activationActa Physiologica Scandinavica74, 301–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Banks, R. W., Hulliger, M., Scheepstra, K. A., and Otten, E., 1997, Pacemaker activity in a sensory ending with multiple encoding sites: the cat muscle spindle primary endingJournal of Physiology498, 177–199.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Boyd, I. A., and Gladden, M. H., 1985The Muscle SpindleMacmillan, London.Google Scholar
  4. Durbaba, R., Taylor, A., Ellaway, P. H., and Rawlinson, S., 2001, Effectiveness of static y-axons in modulating the firing of secondary spindle afferentsJournal of Physiology531, 143–144P.Google Scholar
  5. Hiebert, G. W., and Pearson, K. G., 1999, Contribution of sensory feedback to the generation of extensor activity during walking in the decerebrate catJournal of Neurophysiology81, 758–770.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Houk, J., and Henneman, E., 1967a, Feedback control of skeletal musclesBrain Research5, 433–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Houk, J., and Henneman, E., 1967b, Responses of Golgi tendon organs to active contractions of the soleus muscle of the catJournal of Neurophysiology30, 466–481.Google Scholar
  8. Hulliger, M., 1984, The mammalian muscle spindle and its central controlReviews in Physiology Biochemistry and Pharmacology101, 3–93.Google Scholar
  9. Hulliger, M., Sjolander, P., Windhorst, U. R., and Otten, E., 1995, Force coding by populations of cat Golgi tendon organ afferents: the role of muscle length and motor unit pool activation strategies, in: Alpha and Gamma Motor Systems, A. Taylor, M. H. Gladden and R. Durbaba, ed., Plenum Press, New York, pp. 302–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hunt, C. C., and Kuffler, S. W., 1951, Stretch receptor discharges during muscle contractionJournal of Physiology 113298–315.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Jansen, J. K. S., and Rudjord, T., 1964, On the silent period and Golgi tendon organs of the soleus muscle of the catActa Physiologica Scandinavica62, 364–379.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Matthews, B. H. C., 1933, Nerve endings in mammalian muscleJournal of Physiology78, 1–53.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Matthews, P. B. C., 1972Mammalian Muscle Receptors and their Central ActionsEdward Arnold, London. Merton, P. A., 1953, Speculations on servo control of movement, in:The spinal cordG. E. W. Wolstenholme, ed., Churchill, London, pp. 247–255.Google Scholar
  14. Prochazka, A., 1996, Proprioceptive feedback and movement regulation, in:Handbook of Physiology:. Exercise: Regulation and Integration of Multiple SystemsL. B. Rowell and J. T. Sheperd, ed., American Physiological Society, New York, pp 89–127.Google Scholar
  15. Prochazka, A., Gillard, D., and Bennett, D. J., 1997, Implications of positive feedback in the control of movementJournal of Neurophysiology77, 3237–3251.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Prochazka, A., and Gorassini, M., 1998, Ensemble firing of muscle afferents recorded during normal locomotion in catsJournal of Physiology507, 293–304.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Sheerington, C. S., 1906The Integrative Action of the Nervous SystemConstable, London.Google Scholar
  18. Taylor, A., Durbaba, R., Ellaway, P. H., and Rawlinson, S., 2000a, Patterns of fusimotor activity during locomotion in the decerebrate cat deduced from recordings from hindlimb muscle spindlesJournal of Physiology522, 515–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Taylor, A., Ellaway, P. H., Durbaba, R., and Rawlinson, S., 2000b, Distinctive patterns of static and dynamic gamma motor activity during locomotion in the decerebrate catJournal of Physiology529, 825–836.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anthony Taylor
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of NeuroscienceImperial College School of MedicineLondonUK

Personalised recommendations