Velocity Perception and Proprioception

  • Graham K. Kerr
  • Charles J. Worringham
Part of the Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology book series (AEMB, volume 508)


Proprioceptive information related to position and velocity reaches conscious perception and appears to be processed simultaneously via separate perceptual channels. Determining the fidelity of velocity perception is difficult, however, because of the interaction of distance and timing information in its derivation. There is also a complex relationship between receptor discharge and kinematic variables and thresholds for detection of proprioceptive information are increased during movement. Experiments determined the discrimination thresholds for different movement velocities when i) movement distance remained constant and duration varied; ii) movement duration remained constant and distance varied; iii) movement distance and duration were randomly varied. Discrimination thresholds increased as movement velocity increased. Velocity perception was more accurate when distance and timing cues were available, particularly at higher velocities. These results indicate that all available cues are used to make judgements of movement velocity.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Brenner, E., and Van den Berg, A.V., 1994, Judging object velocity during smooth pursuit eye movementsExperimental Brain Research 99,316–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Burgess, P. R., Wei, J. Y., Clark, F. J., and Simon, J., 1982, Signalling of kinesthetic information by peripheral sensoryreceptors Annual Review of Neuroscience 5171–187.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Burke, D., Hagbarth, K. E., and Lofstedt, L., 1978, Muscle spindle responses in man to changes in load during accurate position maintenanceJournal of Physiology276, 159–164.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Cavallari, P., and Katz, R., 1989, Pattern of projections of group I afferents from forearm muscles to motoneurones supplying biceps and triceps muscles in manExperimental BrainResearch, 78, 465–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cole, J., 1991, Pride and a daily marathon, Duckworth, London.Google Scholar
  6. Collins, D., Cameron, T., Gillard, T.M., and Prochazka, A., 1998, Muscular sense is attenuated when humansmove Journal of Physiology508, 635–643.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cordo, P, Carlton, L, Bevan, L, Carlton, M, and Kerr, G.K., 1994, Proprioceptive triggerring in movement sequences: The role of velocity inputJournal of Neurophysiology71, 1848–1861.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Cordo, P., Gurfinkel, V., Bevan, L., and Kerr, G.K., 1995, Proprioceptive consequences of tendon vibration during movementJournal of Neurophysiology74, 1675–1688.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Edin, B.B., and Vallbo, A.B., 1988, Stretch sensitization of human muscle spindlesJournal of Physiology400, 101–111.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Falmagne, J., 1985Elements of Psychophysical TheoryClarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  11. Gandevia, S., 1995, Kinesthesia: roles for aferent signals and motor commands, In:Handbook of physiology Section 12 Exercise: regulation and integration of multiple systems Part 1 Neural control of movementJ. Smith, ed., American Physiological Society, Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 128–172.Google Scholar
  12. Gandevia, S.C., and Burke, D., 1992, Does the nervous system depend on kinesthetic input to control natural limbmovements? Behavioral and Brain Science15, 615–633.Google Scholar
  13. Ghez, C., Gordon, J., and Ghilardi, M., 1995, Impairments of reaching movements in patients without proprioception. II. Effects of visual information on accuracyJournal of Neurophysiology73, 361–372.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Goodwin, G., Mccloskey, D.I., and Matthews, P., 1972, The contribution of muscle afferents to kinaesthesia shown by vibration induced illusions of movement and by the effects of paralyzing joint afferentsBrain95, 705–748.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gregory, J.E., Mark, R.F., Morgan, D.L., Patak, A., Polus, B., and Proske, U., 1990, Effects of muscle history on the stretch reflex in cat and manJournal of Physiology424, 93–107.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Grill, S.E., and Hallett, M., 1995, Velocity sensitivity of human muscle spindle afferents and slowly adapting type II cutaneous mechanoreceptorsJournal of Physiology489, 593–602.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Grill, S.E., Hallett, M., Marcus, C., and McShane, L., 1994, Disturbances in kinaesthesia in patients with cerebellar disordersBrain117, 1433–1447.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hasan, Z., and Houk, J.C., 1975, Transition in sensitivity of spindle receptors that occurs when muscle is stretched more than a fraction of a millimeterJournal of Neurophysiology38, 673–689.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Kasai, T., Kawanishi, M., and Yahagi, S., 1992, The effects of wrist-muscle vibration on human voluntary elbow flexion-extension movementsExperimental Brain Research90, 217–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kerr, G.K., Bevan, L., Gurfinkel, V., and Cordo, P., 1994, Effects of vibration on the perception of dynamic position and velocity of the passively moving elbowProceedings of the Australian Neuroscience Society 14th Annual Meeting5, 195.Google Scholar
  21. Kerr, G.K., and Marshall, R.N., 1995, Adaptation of arm movements to altered loads: Implications for sensorimotor transformations, In:Motor control and sensory-motor integration: Issues and directionsD.J. Glencross and J.P. Piek, eds., North Holland, pp. 321–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kerr, G.K., Leonard, C., and Worringham, C., 1999, Effects of muscle contraction on the perception of dynamic position during passive movement of the elbowProceedings of the Australian Neuroscience Society Vol 10 19th Annual Meeting. Google Scholar
  23. Lonn, J., Djupsjobacka, M., and Johansson, H., 2001, Replication and discrimination of limb movementvelocity Somatosensory and Motor Research18, 76–82.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Marsden, C., Rothwell, J., and Day, B., 1984, The use of peripheral feedback in the control of movementTrends In Neuroscience7, 253–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Matthews, P.B.C., 1972, Mammalian Muscle Receptors and their Central Actions, Arnold, London.Google Scholar
  26. Mccloskey, D.I., 1978, Kinesthetic sensibilityPhysiological Reviews58, 763–820.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Rymer, W.Z., and d’Almeida, A., 1980, Joint position sense effects of muscle contractionBrain103, 1–22.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sittig, A., Denier van der Gon, J., and Gielen, C., 1985, Separate control of arm position and velocity demonstrated by vibration of muscle tendon in manExperimental Brain Research60, 445–453.Google Scholar
  29. Sittig, A., Denier van der Gon, J., and Gielen, C., 1987, The contribution of afferent information on position and velocity to the control of slow and fast human forearm movementsExperimental Brain Research, 67, 33–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Taylor, J.L., and McCloskey, D.I., 1992, Detection of slow movements imposed at the elbow during active flexion in manJournal of Physiology457, 503–513.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Wallace, K.R., and Kerr, G.K., 1996a, A numerical simulation of muscle spindle ensemble encoding during planar movement of the human armBiological Cybernetics75, 339–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Wallace, K.R., and Kerr, G.K., 1996b, A numerical simulation of muscle spindle ensemble encoding during planar movement of the human arm: correlation sensitivity and parameter dependenceBiological Cybernetics75, 351–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Williams, S., Shenasa, J., and Chapman, E., 1998, Time course of movement-related gating of tactile detection in humans. I. Importance of stimulus locationJournal of Neurophysiology79, 947–963.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Graham K. Kerr
  • Charles J. Worringham
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Human Movement StudiesQueensland University of TechnologyBrisbaneAustralia

Personalised recommendations