Reproductive Health Technology and Genetic Counseling

  • Joan H. Marks
  • Mary H. Miller
Part of the Issues in Women’s Health book series (WOHI)

Abstract

In the fifty years from 1956 to 2006 the field of human genetics will have moved from the numbering of the 46 human chromosomes to the expected mapping of the approximately 35,000 human genes. This explosion of knowledge about genetic aspects of human health has been coupled with similar strides in reproductive technologies to overcome infertility or other barriers to the birth of healthy children. The need for the medical community to communicate this information in a useful way to those who may benefit from it has led to the growth of the profession of genetic counseling.

Keywords

Depression Leukemia Schizophrenia Anemia Syringe 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alan Guttmacher Institute. (1997). Issues in brief—the limitations of U. S. statistics on abortion. Available: http://www.agi-usa.org/pubs/ibl4.html Google Scholar
  2. Alan Guttmacher Institute. (1999, August). The status of major abortion-related laws and policies in the states. Available:http://www.agi-usa.org/pubs/ibl3.html Google Scholar
  3. Belkin, L. (1999, July 25). Getting the girl. The New York Times Magazine, pp. 26–31, 38, 54–55.Google Scholar
  4. Cheung, M. C., Goldberg, J. D., & Kan, Y. W. (1996). Prenatal diagnosis of sickle cell anemia and thalassaemia by analysis of fetal cells in maternal blood. Nature Genetics, 14, 264–268.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dyson, L. L. (1997). Fathers and mothers of school-age children with developmental disabilities: Parental stress, family functioning, and social supports. American Journal of Mental Retardation, 102, 267–279.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fineman, R. M., & Gordis, D. M. (1982). Occasional essay: Jewish perspective on prenatal diagnosis and selective abortion of affected fetuses, including some comparison with prevailing Catholic beliefs. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 12, 355–360.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Finnegan, J. (1993). Shattered dreams—lonely choices: Birth-parents of babies with disabilities talk about adoption. Westport, CT: Bergin & Garvey.Google Scholar
  8. Gans Epner, J. E., Jonas, H. S., & Seckinger, D. L. (1998). Late-term abortion. Journal of the American Medical Association, 280, 724–729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Goldman, M. B., Missmer S. A., & Barbieri, R. L., (1996). Infertility. In M. B. Goldman, & M. C. Hatch (Eds.), Women & health (pp. 196–214). Boston: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  10. Glover, N. M., & Glover, S. J. (1996). Ethical and legal issues regarding selective abortion of fetuses with Down syndrome. Mental Retardation, 34, 207–214.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Harper, P. S. (1998). Genetic counselling: Population aspects. In Practical genetic counselling, 5th ed. (pp. 315–326). Boston: Butterworth Heinemann.Google Scholar
  12. Heckerling, P. S., & Verp, M. S. (1994). A cost-effectiveness analysis of amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling for prenatal genetic testing. Medical Care, 32, 863–880.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hemminki, E., Santalahti, P., & Louhiala, P. (1997). Ethical considerations in regulating the start of life. Perspectives in Biology & Medicine, 40, 586–591.Google Scholar
  14. Hirsch, J. F. (1996). Medical abortion: Ethics, laws and religious points of view. Child’s Nervous System, 12, 507–614.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Hunt, J., & Monach, J. H. (1997). Beyond the bereavement model: The significance of depression for infertility counseling. Human Reproduction, 12(Suppl. 11), 188–194.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Johnson, M. P., & Miller, O. J. (1992). Cytogenetics. In M. I. Evans (Ed.), Reproductive risks and prenatal diagnosis (pp. 237–249). Norwalk, CT: Appleton & Lange.Google Scholar
  17. Kessler, S. (1992). Psychological aspects of genetic counseling. VII. Thoughts on directiveness. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 1, 9–11.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Koonin, L. M., Strauss, L. T., Chrisman, C. E., Montalbano, M. S., Bartlett, L. A., & Smith, J. C. (1999, July). Abortion surveillance—United States, 1996. Morbidity & Mortality Weekly Reports—Surveillance Summaries [On-line serial], 48(SS04). Available: http://www.cdc.gov/
  19. Kubler-Ross, E. (1969). On death and dying. New York: Collier Books.Google Scholar
  20. Minnick, M. S., & Delp, K. J. (Eds.) (1999). A time to decide, a time to heal, 4th ed. St. Johns, MI: Pineapple Press.Google Scholar
  21. National Abortion & Reproductive Rights Action League. (1999). Who decides? A state-by-state review of abortion and reproductive rights. Available: http://www.naral.org Google Scholar
  22. National Adoption Information Clearinghouse. Adopting children with developmental disabilities. Available: http://www.calib.com
  23. National Society of Genetic Counselors (1983). What is a genetic counselor? Available: www.nsgc.org/what_is.html Google Scholar
  24. National Society of Genetic Counselors (1992). Code of ethics. Available: http://www.nsgc.org/Taking_a_Stand.html Google Scholar
  25. Needell, B., & Barth, R. P. (1998). Infants entering foster care compared to other infants using birth status indicators. Child Abuse & Neglect, 22, 1179–1187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Pennings, G. (1996). Ethics of sex selection for family balancing: Family balancing as a morally acceptable application of sex selection. Human Reproduction, 11, 2339–2345.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rapp, R. (1999). Testing women, testing the fetus: The social impact of amniocentesis in America. New York: Rout-ledge.Google Scholar
  28. Salversen, K. A., Oyen, L., Schmidt, N., Malt, U. F, & Eik-Nes, S. H. (1997). Comparison of long-term psychological responses of women after pregnancy termination due to fetal anomalies and after perinatal loss. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 9, 80–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Seligman, M., & Darling, R. B. (1997). Ordinary families, special children: A systems approach to childhood disability, 2nd ed. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  30. Syme, G. B. (1997). Facing the unacceptable: The emotional response to infertility. Human Reproduction, 12(Suppl. 11), 183–187.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joan H. Marks
    • 1
  • Mary H. Miller
    • 2
  1. 1.Human Genetics ProgramSarah Lawrence CollegeBronxvilleUSA
  2. 2.St. Vincent’s HospitalNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations