Advertisement

The Role of Toxicological Science in Risk Assessment and Risk Management

  • Bernard D. Goldstein
Part of the Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology book series (AEMB, volume 500)

Abstract

Toxicological science plays a central role in protecting public health and the environment against environmental risk. It does so directly through providing tools to prevent the development and release of toxic chemicals, and indirectly through its impact on risk assessment. Yet it appears that the influence of toxicological science on the management of risks, appears to be decreasing. This is harmful to the ability of society to make decisions that protect public health and the environment. In part this represents the failure of risk assessment to impact on risk management decisions; in part this is due to the dilution of the impact of toxicological science on risk assessment and on primary prevention, the most effective approach to protecting public health and the environment.

Keywords

Multiple Myeloma Beta Carotene Safety Assessment Acute Myelogenous Leukemia Methyl Tert Butyl Ether 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bergasagel, D.E., Wong, O., Bergsagel, P.L., et al., 1999. Benzene and multiple myeloma: appraisal of the scientific evidence. Blood. 94:1174–1162.Google Scholar
  2. Goldstein, B.D., 1990. Is exposure to benzene a cause of human multiple myeloma? Ann NY Acad Sci. 609:225–230.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Goldstein, B.D., 1996. Editor: R.W. Hahn. Risk Assessment as an Indicator for Decision Making, Risks, Costs, and Lives Saved: Getting Better Results from Regulation. Oxford University Press, New York, NY, 907–914.Google Scholar
  4. Goldstein, B.D., and Erdal, S. MTBE: A Policy Review. Accepted for publication in Ann. Rev. of Energy and the Environment. February, 2000.Google Scholar
  5. Goldstein, B.D., and Shalat, S.L, 2000. The causal relation between benzene exposure and multiple myeloma. Blood. 95 (4):1512–4. Letter.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. IARC, 1991. A Consensus Report of an IARC Monographs Working Group on the Use of Mechanims of Carcinogenesis in Risk Identification (IARC Intern. Tech. Rep. No. 91/002), Lyon.Google Scholar
  7. National Academy of Science, 1983. Risk Assessment in the Federal Government: Managing the Process. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  8. Omaye, S.T., Krinsky, N.I., Kagan, V.E., Mayne, S.T., Liebler, D.C., Bidlack, W.R., 1997. ß-Carotene: Friend or Foe? Fundamental and Applied Toxicology. 40:163–174.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Wong, O., and Raabe, G.K., 2000. Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma and exposure to benzene in a multinational cohort of more than 308,000 petroleum workers, 1937 to 1996. J Occup Environ Med. 42 (5):554–68.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bernard D. Goldstein
    • 1
  1. 1.Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences Institute (EOHSI)PiscatawayUSA

Personalised recommendations