In Vivo Micro Tomography
The diagnosis of osteoporosis is challenging. Usually, the disease progresses slowly, and it is therefore difficult to detect osteoporosis early, or to document the progression of the disease and the effect of a treatment. Several researchers have observed that bone quality cannot be assessed reliably with bone density alone, and that bone microarchitecture has to be considered as well.1-4In spite of these findings, clinical diagnosis still relies almost exclusively on the measurement of bone density. Three-dimensional computed tomography offers a way out of this dilemma. Laib, Rüegsegger, et al. showed with a three-dimensionalin vivoCT scanner that bone structure provides valuable additional information on the skeleton.5,6In recent years, microtomography became an increasingly popular method to image complex structures with features in the micrometer range. A microtomographic system typically assesses a sample in 3D at high spatial resolution, and thus allows unobstructed visual access to the sample’s inner structure. Regardless of whetherin vivoorin vitromeasurements are to be performed, high spatial resolution is the prime factor guiding today’s CT scanner developments. Dose and scanning speed become important issues forin vivomeasurements. Since patient or subject movement have an adverse effect on image quality, the scanning speed ofin vivoCT systems has to be as short as possible.
KeywordsScanning Scheme Pencil Beam Scanning Source Collimator Microtomographic System Load Transfer Analysis
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 2.S. A. Goldstein, S. J. Hollister, J. L. Kuhn and N. Kikuchi, The mechanical and remodeling properties of trabecular bone, in:Biomechanics of Diarthrodial Joints Vol. 2edited by V.C. Mow, A. Ratcliffe, SL-Y Woo, (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1990), pp. 61–81.Google Scholar
- 4.B. D. Snyder, S. Piazza, W. T. Edward, and W. C. Hayes, Role of trabecular morphology in the etiology of age-related vertebral fracturesCalcif. Tissue Int.53-S1, 14–2, (1993).Google Scholar
- 5.A. Laib, H. J. Häuselmann and P. Rüegsegger, In vivo high resolution 3D-QCT of the human forearmTechnology and Health Care6,321–327 (1998).Google Scholar
- 6.P. Rüegsegger, A. Kohlbrenner, D. Ulrich and A. Laib, First results of a multiple fan-beam approach to analyze bone structure in vivoProceedings of SPIE, Developments in X-ray tomography II3772, 55–62 (1999).Google Scholar
- 10.D. Ulrich, T. Hildebrand, B. van Rietbergen, R. Müller and P. Rüegsegger, The quality of trabecular bone evaluated with micro-computed tomography, FEA and mechanical testing, in:Bone Research in Biomechanicsedited by G. Lowet et al., (lOS Press, 1997), pp. 97–112.Google Scholar
- 25.A. Kohlbrenner, S. Hämmerle, A. Laib and P. Rüegsegger, Fast 3D multiple fan-beam CT systemsProceedings of SPIE Developments in X-ray tomography ll3772, 44–5 (1999).Google Scholar
- 26.A. Kohlbrenner, S. Hämmerle, A. Laib and P. Rüegsegger, A 3D microtomographic system with stacked fan-beam geometryNuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research N/MA443(2–3), 531–539 (2000).Google Scholar