Evaluating Sustainability in Planning and Design

  • Patrizia L. Lombardi

Summary

It has often been recognized that planning and design can play an important role in the achievement of sustainable development of cities. However, problems still exist with regards to both a clear understanding of sustainability in the built environment and a means of evaluating it within the context of urban planning and design.

This chapter will briefly compare different evaluation methods in urban planning, both ex ante approaches and monitoring, and their philosophical paradigms. Some significant limitations will be identified and discussed in the context of sustainability, such as the reductionism within many of the approaches and the lack of holism in the evaluation. The identified deficiencies will provide the motivation for the development of a new framework, which is able to integrate the different dimensions of sustainability in the built environment. The resulting framework will also have the potential to allow evaluation of the concept of sustainability over time.

Keywords

OECD Clarification 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Basden A. (1996), Towards an Understanding of Contextualized Technology, in: Proceedings of the International Conference of the Swedish Operations Research Society on Managing the Technological Society: the Next Century’s Challenge to O.R., University of Lulea, Sweden, October 1’3, pp. 17–32.Google Scholar
  2. Bentivegna V. (1997), Limitations in Environmental Evaluations, in: Evaluation in the Built Environment for Sustainability, Brandon P.., Lombardi P.L.., Bentivegna V. (eds.), E&Fn Spon, Chapman&Hall, London, pp. 25–38.Google Scholar
  3. Bequest., Building Environment Quality Evaluation for Sustainability Through Time Network, (1999), Report 1998-99, EC Environment And Climate Research Programme, Theme 4: Human Dimensions & Environmental Change, Directorate D - Rtd Actions: Environment - E.U. Dgl2.Google Scholar
  4. Brandon P.S.., Lombardi P.L.., Bentivegna V. (eds., 1997), Evaluation in the Built Environment for Sustainability, E&Fn Spon, Chapman&Hall, London.Google Scholar
  5. Bruinsma F.., Nijkamp P.., Vreeker R. (1999), Experts at Arm’s Length of Public Policy-Makers. A Case Study on Utrecht (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  6. Capello R.., Nijkamp P.., Pepping, G. (1999), Sustainable Cities and Energy Policies, Springer Verlag, Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. CEC., Commission of the European Community, European’s Fifth Environmental Action Programme (1993), Toward Sustainability, CEC.Google Scholar
  8. Clouser R. (1991), The Myth of Religions Neutrality, University of Notre Dame, London.Google Scholar
  9. Curwell S.., Cooper I. (1998), The Implication of Urban Sustainability, Building Research & Information, 26: 17–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. De Raadt J.D.R. (1994), Expanding the Horizon of Information Systems Design, System Research, 2: 185–199.Google Scholar
  11. DoE., Department of the Environment (1992), Assessing the Impact of Urban Policy, Inner Cities Research Programme, Hmso, London.Google Scholar
  12. Dooyeweerd H. (1958), A New Critique of Theoretical Thought, 4 Vols, Presbyterian and Reformed Publisher Company, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
  13. Fusco Girard L.., Nijkamp P. (1997), Le Valutazioni per lo Sviluppo Sostenibile della Città e del Territorio, Franco Angeli, Milano.Google Scholar
  14. Hart H. (1984), Understanding Our World, Univ. Press of America, Usa.Google Scholar
  15. Kakee A. (1998), The Communicative Turn in Planning and Evaluation, in: Evaluation in Planning. Facing the Challenge of Complexity, Lichfield N. - Barbanente A.., Borri D.., Kakee A.., Prat A. (eds.), Kluwer Ac. Press, Dordrecht, pp. 97–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lichfield N.., Barbanente A.., Borri D.., Kakee A.., Prat A (eds., 1998), Evaluation in Planning. Facing the Challenge of Complexity, Kluwer Ac. Press, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  17. Lichfield N.., Prat A (1998), Linking Ex Ante and Ex Post Evaluation in British Town Planning, in: Evaluation in Planning. Facing the Challenge of Complexity, Lichfield N.., Barbanente A.., Borri D.., Kakee A., Prat A (eds.), Kluwer Ac. Press, Dordrecht, pp. 283–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lombardi P.L.., Basden A. (1997), Environmental Sustainability and Information Systems, Systems Practice, 10: 473–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lombardi P.L. (1998), Sustainability Indicators in Urban Planning Evaluation, in: Evaluation in Planning. Facing the Challenge of Complexity, Lichfield N.., Barbanente A.., Borri D.., Kakee A.., Prat A. (eds.), Kluwer Ac. Press, Dordrecht, pp. 177–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lombardi P.L. (1999), Understanding Sustainability in the Built Environment. A Framework for Evaluation in Urban Planning and Design, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Salford, September 1999.Google Scholar
  21. May A.D.., Mitchell G.., Kupiszewska D. (1997), The Development of the Leeds Quantifiable City Model, in: Evaluation in the Built Environment for Sustainability, Brandon P.., Lombardi P.L.., Bentivegna V. (eds.), E&Fn Spon, Chapman&Hall, London, pp. 39–52.Google Scholar
  22. Merret S. (1995), Planning in the Age of Sustainability, Scandinavia Housing & Planning Research, 12: 5–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mitchell G. (1996), Problems and Fundamentals of Sustainable Development Indicators, Sustainable Development, 4: 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mitchell G. (1999), A Geographical Perspective on the Development of Sustainable Urban Regions, Earthscan (in press).Google Scholar
  25. Mitchell G.., May A., Mcdonald A. (1995), Picabue: A Methodological Framework for the Development of Indicators of Sustainable Development, Int. Journal Sustainable Development World Ecol., 2: 104–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Nijkamp P. (ed., 1991), Urban Sustainability, Gower, Aldershot.Google Scholar
  27. Nijkamp P.., Pepping G. (1998), A Meta-Analytic Evaluation of Sustainable City Initiatives, Urban Studies, 35: 1481–1500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Nijkamp P.., Bal F.., Medda F. (1999), A Survey of Methods for Sustainable City Planning and Cultural Heritage Management (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  29. OECD (1997), Better Understanding Our Cities. The Role of Urban Indicators, OECD, Paris.Google Scholar
  30. Palmer J.., Cooper I.., Van Der Vost R. (1997), Mapping Out Fuzzy Buzzwords., Who Sits Where on Sustainability and Sustainable Development, Sustainable Development, 5: 87–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. UNCED., United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (1992), Earth Summit ’92 (Agenda 21), Regency Press, London.Google Scholar
  32. Voogd H. (1998), The Communicative Ideology and Ex Ante Planning Evaluation, in: Evaluation in Planning. Facing the Challenge of Complexity, Lichfield N.., Barbanente A.., Borri D.., Kakee A.., Prat A (eds.), Kluwer Ac. Press, Dordrecht, pp. 113–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Patrizia L. Lombardi
    • 1
  1. 1.Dipartimento Casa-CittàPolitecnico di TorinoItaly

Personalised recommendations