Knowledge in Self-Organization Process: Hope (Finite) of System Thinking

  • Antonín Rosicky

Abstract

An apposite appellation of dramatically forced changes in contemporary society encounters dilemmas resulting from their newly emergent properties. Moreover aspiration to entitle nature of contemporary environment briefly brings reductions of its growing complexity. Stressing some particular attributes original labels have qualified essential transformation in economic, political and cultural life by comparing with (seemingly) periods as post-industrial, post-capitalist or post-modern. The name ‘information society’ is based on recognized importance of information within society however it is inherited from evident features of modern information technology. Inconsistency of such associates with a foggy concept of information now replaced by the term ‘knowledge society’.

Keywords

Coherence Assure Adenin Cytosin Kelly 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arieti, S. (1976). Creativity: The Magic Synthesis, Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar
  2. Ashby R. (1956). An Introduction to Cybernetics, Chapman Hall, London.MATHGoogle Scholar
  3. Banathy, B. (1996). Information-based Design of Social Systems, Behavioural Science, Vol. 41, pp. 104-123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to Ecology of Mind, Northvale, Jason Aronson Inc.Google Scholar
  5. Beck, U. (1992). Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity, Sage Publications, London.Google Scholar
  6. Checkland, P. (1981). Systems Thinking, Systems Practice; Wiley, Chichester.Google Scholar
  7. Foucault, M. (1971). Orders of discourse, Social Science Information, Vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 7-30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gibson, R. (ed.) (1996). Rethinking the Future, Nikolas Breadley Pub., London.Google Scholar
  9. Heisenberg, W. (1979). Der Teil und das Ganze - Gespräche im Umkreis der Atomphisic, Deutscher Taschenbucehr Verlag GmbH & Co.KG, München.Google Scholar
  10. von Hayek, F.A. (1973). Law, Legislation and Liberty, Routledge, London.Google Scholar
  11. Heylighen, F. (1995). Memetics, catchword, http://www.cict.demon.co.uk/(10. 8. 2001).Google Scholar
  12. Giddens, A. (1990). The Consequences of Modernity, Polity Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  13. Kampis, G. (1991). Selfmodifying Systems in Biology and Cognitive Science, Pergamon Press, Oxford, NY.Google Scholar
  14. Klír, G. (1991). Facets of Systems Science, Pergamon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  15. von Krogh, G., Ichijo, K., and Nonaka, I. (2000). Enabling Knowledge Creation, Oxford Univ. Press, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kuhn, T.S. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolution, The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  17. Marchand D., Davenport, T., and Dickson T. (2000). Mastering Information Management, Prentice Hall, London.Google Scholar
  18. Maturana, H., and Varela, F. (1998). The Tree of Knowledge, Shamhala, Boston.Google Scholar
  19. Mingers, J. (1995). Self Producing Systems - Implication and Applications of Autopoiesis, Plenum, New York.Google Scholar
  20. Miller, J. (1978). Living Systems, McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  21. Pribram, K.H. (1999). Mozek a mysl / Brain and Mind (selected papers), Galery, Praha.Google Scholar
  22. Rapoport, A. (1986). General System Theory, Abacus Press, Turnbridge Wells, UK.Google Scholar
  23. Rosicky, A. (1998). The Danger of an Anonymous Power, in: Proceedings from IDIMT ’98 Conference, Univesitätverlag R. Trauner, Linz.Google Scholar
  24. Rosicky, A. (1999). Information within the (Human) System: Considerations of Freedom, Power and Order, in: Synergy Matters, Plenum, New York, Proceedings from 6th UKSS International Conference in Lincoln, UK.Google Scholar
  25. Searle, J. (1986). Mind, Brains and Science, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Simon, H. (1983). What Is Industrial Democracy?, in: Economic Impact, Vol. 34, No. 3, pp. 76,83.Google Scholar
  27. Snow, C.P. (1962). Science and Gouvernment, The Godkin Luctures at Harvard University, New York: New American Library.Google Scholar
  28. Ulrich, W. (1994). Critical Heuristics of Social Planning, Wiley, Chichester.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Antonín Rosicky
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of System AnalysisUniversity of Economics, PraguePraha 3CR

Personalised recommendations