Taxis — A Conceptual Model to Support the Early Stages of the ISD Process

  • Paula Morais
  • João Álvaro Carvalho

Abstract

During the information systems development (ISD) process, after the analysis of the organizational system, it is necessary to define the requirements for the computer based information systems (CBIS) that should be developed, in order to support organizational work. Normally, at this stage, it is assumed that CBIS are undifferentiated. However there are different types of CBIS that provide different functionality, deal with different types of information and support different kinds of organizational work. ISD methodologies do not consider differentiated suggestions to the development of different types of CBIS. It can be argued that, being aware of the type of system to be developed system developers could increase their efficacy. Such an approach to the ISD process demands a systematic and complete description of the different types of CBIS, i.e., a taxonomy of CBIS, that takes into account their functionality, the information they handle, and the processes they support.

This paper presents TAXIS, taxonomy of information systems, supported by two fundamental dimensions: processes support and content support and describes how the taxonomy can be used to support the early stages of the ISD process.

Keywords

Marketing Stein Malone 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ackerman, M., Definitional and Contextual Issues in Organizational and Group Memories, 1993, (October 1, 1998), http://ww\v.ics.uci.edu/~ackerman/docs/hicss94/hicss94.htmlGoogle Scholar
  2. Alter, S., 1994, Information Systems, a Management Perspective, 2nd ed Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  3. Alter, S., 1977, “A taxonomy of decision support systems”, Sloan Management Review, 19, Fall, 39–56.Google Scholar
  4. Amaral, Luis, 1994, “PRAXIS: Um Referencial para o Planeamento de Sistemas de Informagão”, Ph.D. Thesis, Universidade do Minho, Portugal.Google Scholar
  5. Anthony, R.N., 1965, Planning and Control Systems: A Framework for Analysis. Boston Harvard University Graduate School of Business Administration.Google Scholar
  6. APQC,Process Classification Framework, 1996, (September 10, 1998), http://www.apqc.org/free/framework.htmGoogle Scholar
  7. Capilla, R., Application of Domain Analysis to Knowledge Reuse, 1996, (May 4, 1998), http://www.umcs.maine.edu/∼ftp/wisr/wisr8/papers/capilla/capilla.html.Google Scholar
  8. Coleman, D., Groupware: Collaborative Strategies for Corporate LANS and Intranets Collaborative Strategies, 1997,, (June 5, 1997), http://www.collaborate.com/publications/chapt_toc.html.Google Scholar
  9. Curtis, G., 1998, Business Information Systems: Analysis, Design and Practice, 3rd ed Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  10. Davis, G. B., and M. H. Olson, 1985, Management Information Systems: Conceptual Foundations, Structure, and Development, 2nd ed, McGraw-Hill Book Company.Google Scholar
  11. Doke, E. Reed, and Tonya Barrier, 1994, “An assessment of information systems taxonomies: time to be reevaluate?”, Journal of Information Technology, 9, 149–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ein-Dor, Philip, and Eli Segev, 1993, “A classification of information systems: analysis and interpretation”, Information Systems Research, 4, 2, 166–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Elliot, S., Arthur Andersen Maximizes Its Core Commodity through Comprehensive Knowledge Management, APQC, 1997, (May 8, 1998), http://www.apqc.com.Google Scholar
  14. Ellis, C.A., S.J. Gibbs, and G.L. Rein, 1991, “Groupware: some issues and experiences”, Communications of the ACM, 34, 1,39–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ferreira, J.M.C., J. Neves, P.N. Abreu, and A. Caetano, 1996, Psicossociologia Das Organizações, McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  16. Frakes, B., R. Prieto-Diaz, and C. Fox, Dare: Domain Analysis and Reuse Environment. 1995, (May 7, 1998), http://www.umcs.main.edu/~ftp/wisr/wisr7/papers/frakes/frakes.html.Google Scholar
  17. Galliers, R., and B. Baker, 1994, Strategic Information Management: Challenges and Strategies in Managing Information Systems, Butterworth Heinemann.Google Scholar
  18. Gorry, G. A., and M. Scott Morton, 1971, “A framework for management information systems”, Sloan Management Review, Fall, 55–70.Google Scholar
  19. Grimshaw, David J., 1992, “Towards a taxonomy of information systems: or does anyone need a Taxi?”, Journal of Information Technology, 1, 30–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hatch, M.J., 1997, Organization Theory: Modern, Symbolic, and Postmodern Perspectives, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Holsapple, C.W., and W. Luo, 1996, “A framework for studying computer support of organizational infrastructure”, Information & Management, 31, 13–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Khoshafian, S., and M. Buckiewicz, 1995, Introduction to Groupware, Workflow, and Workgroup Computing Wiley.Google Scholar
  23. Kjaer, A., and K. Madsen, Dependencies between Work Activities, Technical Artifacts, Space, and Work Organisation: Flexibility Issues, 1996,, (July 8,1998), http://iris.informatik.gu.se/sjis/Vol7No2/KjarbMad.htm.Google Scholar
  24. KPMG, The Knowledge Journey, 1997, (April 7, 1998), http://www.kpmg.co.uk.Google Scholar
  25. Leavitt, H.J., “Applying organizational change in industry: structural, technological and humanistic approaches” In Handbook of Organizations, J.G. March and R. McNally, 1965Google Scholar
  26. Lewis, P., 1994, Information Systems Development: Systems Thinking in the Field of Information Systems, London Pitman Publishing.Google Scholar
  27. Malone, T.W., K. Crowston, J. Lee, B. Pentland, C. Dellarocas, G. Wyner, J. Quimby, C. Osborn, A. Bernstein, G. Herman, M. Klein, and E. O’Donnell, 1999, “Tools for inventing organizations: toward a handbook of organizational processes”, Management Science, 45, 3, 425–443, http://ccs.mit.edu/21c/mgtsci/index.htm.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Marca, D., and C. McGowan, 1993, IDEFO-SADT Business Process and Enterprise Modelling, Ecletic Solutions Corporation.Google Scholar
  29. Mentzas, G., 1994, “A functional taxonomy of computer-based information systems”, International Journal of Information Management, 14, 397–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Morais, P., 2000, “Taxionomia De Sistemas Informáticos”, Universidade do Minho.Google Scholar
  31. Morais, P., and J.A. Carvalho, “Using a taxonomy of computer based information systems to improve the requirements engineering process”, Business Information Technology: generative futures - BIT’99, Manchester, 1999,65Google Scholar
  32. Morais, P., F. Lopes, J.A. Carvalho, and L. Amaral, “A systematisation of knowledge to support an organisational repository”, Business Information Technology: generative futures - BIT’99, Manchester, 1999, 64Google Scholar
  33. Morrison, J., “Organizational memory information systems: characteristics and development strategies”, Proceedings of the Thirtieth Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 1997Google Scholar
  34. Nickerson, R.C., A Taxonomy of Collaborative Applications, 1997, (December 2, 1997), http://hsb.baylor.edu/ramsower/ais.ac.97/papers/nockers.htm.Google Scholar
  35. O’Brien, J., 2000, Introduction to Information Systems: Essentials for the Internetworked Enterprise, 9th ed, McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  36. Ould, M., 1995, Business Processes: Modelling and Analysis for Re-Engineering and Improvement, Wiley.Google Scholar
  37. Pearson, J. Michael, and J. P. Shim, 1994, “An empirical investigation into decision support systems capabilities: a proposed taxonomy”, Information & Management, 27, 45–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Pohl, Klaus, 1996, Process-Centered Requirements Engineering, John Wiley.Google Scholar
  39. Porter, M., 1989, Vantagem Competitiva: Criando E Sustentando Um Desempenho Superior, 5a ed, Editora Campus.Google Scholar
  40. Prieto-Diaz, R., 1993, “Status report: software reusability”, IEEE Software, 10, 3, 61–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Prieto-Diaz, Ruben, Some Experiences in Domain Analysis, 1995, (May 7, 1998), ftp://gandalf.umcs.maine.edu/pubAVISR/wisr6/proceedings/ascii/prieto.ascii.Google Scholar
  42. Schill, A., 1995, Cooperative Office Systems, Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  43. Scott Morton, M., 1991, The Corporation of the 1990s, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Scott, R., 1998, Organizations: Rational, Natural, and Open Systems, 4th ed. Prentice Hall Press.Google Scholar
  45. Seemann, P., D. De Long, S. Stucky, and E. Guthrie, “Building intangible assets: a strategic framework for investing in intellectual capital”, PAKeM99, 1999, 229Google Scholar
  46. SEI, Software Engineering Institute, Domain Engineering and Domain Analysis, 1997, (May 7, 1998), http://www.sei.cmu.edu/str/descriptions/deda_body.html.Google Scholar
  47. Slamecka, V., “Information Processing and Information Systems” In Encyclopedia Britannica, 21, 1994, 615–630.Google Scholar
  48. Stein, E., and V. Zwass, 1995, “Actualising organizational memory with information systems”, Information Systems Research, 85–116.Google Scholar
  49. Teng, J.T.C., and K. Ramamurthy, 1993, “Group decision support systems: clarifying the concept and establishing a functional taxonomy”, INFOR, 31, 3, 166–185.MATHGoogle Scholar
  50. UMIST, Hitec Ltd, Telefonica, BIM, e Interprogram BV, Amadeus - a Multi-Method Approach for Developing Universal Specifications, 1986, (March 6, 1997), http://apollo.cordis.lu/cordos-cgi/Google Scholar
  51. UMIST/BIM, Amadeus Project, a Report on Task Bl: A Report Classifying System Types, 1986Google Scholar
  52. UsabilityFirst, Introduction to Groupware, 1999, (January 7, 1999), http://www.usabilityfirst.com/groupware/intro.html.Google Scholar
  53. van Heijst, G., R. van der Spek, and E. Kruizing, 1996, Organizing Corporate Memories.Google Scholar
  54. Walsh, J., and G.R. Ungson, 1991, “Organizational memory”, Academy of Management Review, 16, 1, 57–91.Google Scholar
  55. Wijnhoven, F., “Organizational memory and information technology: the missing link”, 4th European Conference on Information Systems, Lisbon, 1996, 571–584.Google Scholar
  56. Xu, Xian-Zhong, and G.R. Kaye, 1997, “Beyond automation and control: manufacturing information systems from a strategic perspective”, International Journal of Information Management, 17, 6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paula Morais
    • 1
  • João Álvaro Carvalho
    • 2
  1. 1.Departamento InformáticaUniversidade PortucalensePortoPortugal
  2. 2.Departamento Sistemas InformaçãoUniversidade do MinhoGuimarãesPortugal

Personalised recommendations