Abstract
Strategic Information Systems Planning (SISP) is a specific subset of the overall Strategic Planning process for any organisation.
This paper argues that current methods of SISP, and stakeholder discovery, produce unrepresentative lists of stakeholders and unacceptably narrow system boundaries resulting in a plan that contains insufficient knowledge about the organisation and its environment.
To address this insufficiency, this paper shows that a more inclusive list of stakeholders can be obtained using the Framework and its tools introduced in this paper.
The Framework introduced here includes a number of novel tools for system planning for the organisation in its environment. To grasp the complexity of a CIS and its stakeholders within an organisational context we have devised a diagrammatic model - the “Stakeholder Web”. The web shows a classification and grouping of stakeholders using a holistic view of the situation. The Framework also highlights the use of the Interaction Matrix, which is used to show existing (formal) communication links and commonalities of interest, between stakeholders. These two tools are used in conjunction with each other through a process of action research and participatory techniques in the organisation.
The paper shows through a retrospective analysis of the case of UH (a university), that use of the proposed Framework throughout the process of SISP in this organisation, would have shortened the planning process and improved the system subsequently developed.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Avison DE & Wood-Harper AT, 1990, Multiview: An Exploration in Information Systems Development Henley-on-Thames: Alfred Waller Ltd
Brown, 1996, ‘Q Methodology and Qualitative Research’ Qualitative Health Research 6 4 Nov pp561–567
Checkland PB, 1981, System Thinking, Systems Practice Chichester: Wiley
Clegg SR, 1989, Frameworks of power London, UK: Sage
Coakes E & Coakes J, 1994, “How to Specify IT”, Marketing Business, March, pp35–36
Coakes E & Coakes J, 1995a, ‘Using Business Process Re-engineering (BPR) for Developing Quality Information Systems’ The Monograph Series Faculty of Business, Unit of Luton, FB WP 95/4
Coakes E & Coakes J, 1995b, ‘PR for developing information systems - a case study’in Lee M, Barta B-Z, and Juliff P (eds) Software Quality and productivity: Theory, practice, education and training London:Chapman and Hall
Coakes E & Elliman T, 1997, ‘Stakeholders and systems in a turbulent environment’ in R Galliers, S Carlsson, C Loebbecke, C Murphy, HR Hansen, R O’Callaghan (eds) 5TH ECIS Cork 3 pp 1060–1069 )
Coakes E & Elliman T 1999 ‘The Role of Stakeholders in Managing Change’ CAIS Volume 2, Article 4 July
Coakes E & Lloyd-Jones R 1997 ‘Getting IT together: the evolving nature of inter-group relationships.’ Information Technology in Nursing 9 5 pp 18–22
Coakes J & Coakes E 2000 “Specifications In Context: Stakeholders, Systems And Modelling Of Conflict” Requirements Engineering Journal 5 2
DES (1989) The English Polytechnics; An HMI Commentary Dept. of Education and Science, HMSO, London
Earl MJ, 1999, ‘Approaches to Information Systems Planning: Experiences in strategic information systems planning’ in Strategic Information Management ed Rd Galliers, DE Leidner and BSH Baker 2nd edit Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann
Earl M, 1988, Information Management: The Strategic Dimension Oxford: Clarendon Press
Flood RL & M.C Jackson, 1991, Critical Systems Thinking: Directed Readings, Chichester, UK: Wiley
Gertner R, 1999, ‘Game Theory in the Real World’ FT Mastering Strategy Series 9 Nov
Gottschalk P, 2001, ‘Key Issues in IS Management in Norway: An Empirical Study based on Q Methodology’ Information Resources Management Journal Apr-June pp37–45
Handy C, 1981, Understanding Organisations 2nd ed. Harmondsworth:Penguin
Hirschheim, R.,1983, “Assessing Participative Systems Design: Some Conclusions from an Exploratory Study”, Information and Management, (6), pp. 317–327
IBM, 1975, ‘Business Systems Planning’ in JD Cougar, MA Coulter and RW Knapp 1982 Advanced Systems Development/Feasibility Techniques Wiley: New York
Introna L, 1997, Management, Information and Power Basingstoke: Macmillan
Johnson G & Scholes K 1999 Exploring Corporate Strategy 5th ed. Hemel Hempstead: Prentice Hall
Land F, 1999, ‘Evaluation in a Socio-Technical Context’, Working Paper, LSE
Martin J, 1991, Information Engineering Methodology Reston: JMC Consultants
Mintzberg H, 1993, Structure in Fives: Designing Effective Organisations Prentice Hall
Suchman LA, 1987, Plans and Situated Action Trowbridge: Redwood Burn
Von Bertalannffy L,1973, General Systems Theory Penguin
Weick K, 1969/1979, The Social Psychology of Organising Reading MA: Addision Wesley
UH References
ISC3 1998 SD 16 Information and Learning Resources Strategy, May
ISC 1999 M47 Meeting Minutes 10 Dec
ISSG 1993 M2 1 1 Meeting Minutes 3 Nov
ISSG 1994 Ci21a 2 1 1 Correspondence to Policy and Resource Committee
ISSG 1994 D23 11 Committee Paper on Teleworking
ISSG 1994 M9 2 fl Meeting Minutes 16 May
ISSG 1994 M9 RB 2 fl Meeting Minutes 16 May
ISSG 1994 R6a Draft Strategy Report (version 1) July
ISSG 1994 Wa4 3 3 bl Committee Discussion Paper relating to Administrative Systems
ISSG 1996 M23 Meeting Minutes 19 Feb
MIS Manager (TS) 1999 30th April Interview transcript
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2002 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Coakes, E., Elliman, T. (2002). Stakeholders and Boundaries in Strategic Information Systems Planning. In: Harindranath, G., et al. New Perspectives on Information Systems Development. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0595-2_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0595-2_1
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-5149-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-0595-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive