Advertisement

Carbon Dioxide Gas as an Angiographic Contrast Agent in the Cerebral Circulation

  • Alan J. Wilson
  • Miriam M. Boxer

Abstract

Carbon dioxide gas (CO2) has been in limited use in radiology as an intra-arterial, digital subtraction angiographic contrast medium for more than 20 years. It has a number of advantages over conventional iodinated contrast media, including its low cost, low viscosity, rapid pulmonary elimination, buoyancy, and lack of nephrotoxic and allergenic effects. Its disadvantages include the need to avoid air contamination and to use a dedicated injector system (Kerns et al.,1995). It has the potential to be used in all areas where iodine-containing contrast media are used, with the exception of the cerebral vasculature (Hawkins and Caridi, 1998). This exception is due to continuing concerns about the neurotoxicity of CO2 within the cerebral vessels. These concerns are due to a number of conflicting animal studies on the neurotoxicity of CO2 in the cerebral vasculature. Some studies have reported severe neurotoxicity (Coffey et al.,1984; Linstedt et al.,1997), while others have reported no neurotoxicity at all (Shifrin et al.,1990; Dimakakos et al,1998; Hawkins and Caridi, 1998). Interpretation of these inconsistent results is complicated by the fact that most have not used a systematic experimental approach, with different volumes, pressures, injection numbers and injection sites used within the same experiment. There have also been suspicions that air contamination, large volumes and explosive delivery of the CO2 may have contributed to the adverse findings (Hawkins and Caridi, 1998).

Keywords

Digital Subtraction Angiography Evans Blue Cerebral Vasculature Histological Damage Evans Blue Staining 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Coffey, R., Quisling, R. G., Mickle, J. P., Hawkins, I. F., and Ballinger, W. B., 1984, The cerebrovascular effects of intraarterial CO2 in quantities required for diagnostic imaging. Radiology 151: 405–410.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Dimakakos, P. B., Stefanopoulos, T., Doufas, A. G., Papasava, M., Gouliamos, A., Mourikis, D., and Deligiorgi, H., 1998, The cerebral effects of carbon dioxide during digital subtraction angiography in the aortic arch and its branches in rabbits. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol. 19: 261–266.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Ehrman, K. O., Taber, T. E., Gaylord, G. M, Brown, P. B., and Hage, J. P., 1994, Comparison of diagnostic accuracy with carbon dioxide versus iodinated contrast material in the imaging of hemodialysis access fistulas. JVIR 5: 771–775.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Hawkins, I. F., and Caridi, J. G., 1998, Carbon dioxide (CO2) digital subtraction angiography: 26-year experience at the University of Florida. Eur. Radiol. 8: 391–402.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hawkins, I. F., Mladinich, C. R. J., Storm, B., Croker, B. P., Wilcox, C. S., Akins, E. W., and Drake, W., 1994, Short-term effects of selective renal arterial carbon dioxide administration on the dog kidney. JVIR 5: 149–154.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Kerns, S. R., and Hawkins, IF, 1995, Carbon dioxide digital subtraction angiography: expanding applications and technical evolution. AJR 164: 735–741.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Linstedt, U., Link, J., Grabener, M., and Kloess, W., 1997, Effects of selective angiography of the carotid artery with carbon dioxide on electroencephalogram somatosensory evoked potentials and histopathologic findings: a pilot study in pigs. Invest. Radiol. 32: 507–510.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Mladinich, C. R. J., Hawkins, I. F., Heaton-Jones, T. G., Shiroma, J. T., Weingarten, K., Kiehl, A., Calderwood Mays, M. B., and Kublis, P., 1995, Effects of carbon dioxide arterial infusion on hepatic biochemistry and histology in a rabbit model. Invest. Radiol. 30: 192–195.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Nagy, Z., Szabo, M., and Hüttner, I., 1985, Blood-brain barrier impairment by low pH buffer perfusion via the internal carotid artery in rat. Acta Neuropathol. (Berl.) 68: 160–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Nishimoto, K., Wolman, M., Spatz, M., and Klatzo, I., 1978, Pathophysiologic correlations in the blood-brain barrier damage due to air embolism. Adv. Neurol. 20: 237–244.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Persson, L. I., Johansson, B. B., and Hansson, H.-A., 1978, Ultrastructural studies on blood-brain barrier dysfunction after cerebral air embolism in the rat. Acta Neuropathol. (Berl.) 44: 53–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Salahuddin, T. S., Johansson, B. B., Kalimo, H., and Olsson, Y., 1988, Structural changes in the rat brain after carotid infusions of hyperosmolar solutions: a light microscopic and immunohistochemical study. Neuropathol. Appl. Neurobiol. 14: 467–482.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Shifrin, E. G., Plich, M. B., Verstandig, A. G., and Gomori, M., 1990, Cerebral angiography with gaseous carbon dioxide CO2. J. Cardiovasc. Surg. 31: 603–606.Google Scholar
  14. Sokrab, T. E. O., Johansson, B. B., Kalimo, H., and Olsson, Y., 1988, A transient hypertensive opening of the blood-brain barrier can lead to brain damage: extravasation of serum proteins and cellular changes in rats subjected to aortic compression. Acta. Neuropathol. (Berl.) 75: 557–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Wilson, A. J., Evill, C. A., and Sage, M. R., 1991, The influence of low pH on blood-brain barrier effects of intracarotid iopromide. Invest. Radiol. 26: S113–S114.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alan J. Wilson
    • 1
  • Miriam M. Boxer
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Medical Imaging, School of MedicineFlinders UniversityBedford ParkAustralia

Personalised recommendations