Skip to main content

Swedish Local Government: Is There a Bailout Problem?

  • Chapter
Fiscal Federalism in Unitary States

Part of the book series: ZEI Studies in European Economics and Law ((ZEIS,volume 6))

Abstract

The vertical structure of government in all OECD countries is characterized by a hierarchy of two or three layers of governments, with the national government at the top and local government at the bottom. Typically, unitary states like Sweden have two layers, while federal states like Germany have three layers of more. This structure serves as a basis for assigning specific tasks to local governments, which, due to their closer proximity to the citizen and their better knowledge of local economic conditions, they can fulfil better than the central government.1 Decentralization of the public sector also serves to create competition for taxpayers among local governments. Such competition is regarded as a check on rent-seeking behavior of selfish politicians and on excessive growth of government.2

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aizenman, Joshua (1998) “Fiscal Disciplin in a Union” in F. Sturzenegger and M. Tomassi (eds.), The Political Economy of Reform. Boston: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bevilaqua, A. (2000) “State Government Bailouts in Brazil.” Working Paper, Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bordignon M. (2000) “Problems of Soft Budget Constraint in Intergovernmental Relationship: The Case of Italy”, Working Paper, Catholic University of Milan, Milan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan G. and J.M. Buchanan (1977) “Towards a Tax Constitution for Leviathan”, Journal of Public Economics, 8, 255–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Careaga, Maite, and Barry R. Weingast (2000) “The Fiscal Pact with the Devil: A Positive Approach to Fiscal Federalism, Revenue Sharing, and Good Governance.” Working paper, Stanford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crespin, Herman (2000) “Local Government in Sweden — Tasks and Financing.” Mimeo, Swedish Association of Local Authorities, Stockholm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlberg, Matz, and Eva Johansson (2002) “On the Vote Purchasing Behavior of Incumbent Governments.” American Political Science Review 96, 27–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahlberg, Matz, and Per Pettersson-Lidbloom (2002) “The Bailout Problem: An Empirical Approach.” Mimeo, Uppsala University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixit, Avinash, and John Londregan (1996) “The Determinants of Success of Special Interests in Redistributive Politics.” Journal of Politics 58, 1132–1155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixit, Avinash, and John Londregan (1998) “Ideology, Tactics, and Efficiency in Redistributive Politics.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 113, 497–529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez-Arias, Eduardo, Ernesto Stein, and Jürgen von Hagen (2002) Subnational Government Bailouts. Washington DC: Interamerican Development Bank. forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodspeed, Tim (2001) “Bailouts in a Federation.” Working Paper, City University of New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inman, Robert P. (2002) “Transfers and Bailouts: Enforcing Local Fiscal Discipline with Lessons from US Federalism.” in: Rodden and Eskeland (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindbeck, Assar, and Jörgen Weibull (1993) “A Model of Political Equilibrium in a Representative Democracy.” Journal of Public Economics 51: 195–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murray, Richard (1985) “Central Control of the Local Government Sector in Sweden.” in Edward Gramlich and Bengt-Christer Ysander (eds), Control of Local Governments, IUI Conference Reports series 1985:1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicolini, J. P., J. Sanguinetti, P. Sanguinetti, and M. Tommasi (2000) “Decentralization, Fiscal Discipline in Subcentral Governments, and the Bailout Problem: The Argentine Case.” Working Paper, Interamerican Development Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molander, P. (1999) “Reforming Budgetary Institutins: Swedish Experiences.” In: R. Strauch and J. von Hagen (eds.) Institutions, Politics, and Fiscal Policy. ZEI Studies in European Economics and Law II, Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oates W. (1999) “An Essay on Fiscal Federalism”, Journal of Economic Literature, vol. XXXVII, pages 1120–1149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olson M. Jr. (1969) “The Principle of’ Fiscal Equivalence’: The Division of Responsibilities Among Different Levels of Government.” American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings 59, 479–487.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, Olof (2001) Kommunalpolitik, fjärde upplagan, Nordstedts juridik, Stockholm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pisauro, Giuseppe (2001) “Intergovernmental Relations and Fiscal Discipline: Between Commons and Soft Budget Constraints.” IMF Working Paper 01/65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renteria, Carolina, Roberto Steiner, and Juan J. Echevarria (2000) “Bailouts of Territorial Entities by the Central Government of Colombia.” Working Paper, FEDESARROLLO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodden, Jonathan (2001) “The Dilemma of Fiscal Federalism: Grants and Fiscal Performance around the World.” Mimeo: Department of Political Science, MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodden, Jonathan, and Gunnar S. Eskeland (2002) “Decentralization and Bailouts.” Mimeo, MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodden, Jonanthan, and Gunnar S. Eskeland (2002) “Summary and Conclusions”, in Rodden and Eskeland (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodden, Jonathan, Gunnar S. Eskeland, and Jennie Litvack (2002) “Introduction and Overview.” in Rodden and Eskeland (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  • Velasco A. (1999) “A Model of Endogenous Fiscal Deficits and Delayed Fiscal Reforms.” in Poterba and Von Hagen (eds.) Fiscal Institutions and Fiscal Performance. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Hagen, Jürgen (2000) “Subnational Government Bailouts in OECD Countries: Four Case Studies.” ZEI Working Paper, University of Bonn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Hagen J. and M. Hallerberg (1999) “Electoral Institutions, Cabinet Negotiations, and Budget Deficits in the EU.” in Poterba and von Hagen (eds.) Fiscal Institutions and Fiscal Performance. University of Chicago Press 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Hagen J. and I. Harden (1995) “Budget Processes and Commitment to Fiscal Discipline.” European Economic Review 39, 771–779.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wildasin, David (1998) “Externalities and Bailouts: Hard and Soft Budget Constraints in Intergovernmental Fiscal Relations.” Mimeo: Vanderbilt University.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jürgen von Hagen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

von Hagen, J., Dahlberg, M. (2004). Swedish Local Government: Is There a Bailout Problem?. In: Molander, P. (eds) Fiscal Federalism in Unitary States. ZEI Studies in European Economics and Law, vol 6. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0503-7_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0503-7_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-5109-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-0503-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics