Abstract
It is an unquestionable fact that water is a sine qua non for all forms of life on earth. Furthermore, economic and social development of countries requires the access of all citizens to adequate and safe water supply services. World Summit on Sustainable Development held in Johannesburg in September 2002 stressed the importance of water under the slogan “No Water No Future”. However, current policies pursued in this regard treat the issue as a problem of operation and management rather than one related to the scarcity of resources. Full transfer of service costs to users (full cost recovery), mottos like “user pays-polluter pays” and commercialization and privatization of related services are the basic instruments of this policy.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Barlow M. (1999). “International Forum and Globalization (IFG)”, 5 Blue Gold, California.
Editorial (2001). “IMF and World Bank Push Water Privatization and Full Cost Recovery on Poor Countries”, News and Notices, Spring.
Editorial (1999). “Cities, Regions and Privatised Utilities”, Progress in Planning, vol. 51, part. 2, Pergamon.
Editorial (2000). “Concerns Over Monsanto’s Moves in Water Business” Bio News, No: 22, 15.
EU (1999). <http://www.europe.eu.int/comm/environment/wconf>.
Görer N. (2000). “Evaluation of the Policies on Urban Infrastructure: The case of Water Supply and Sewerage Sectors”, Ankara University Institute of Social Sciences, Programme in Urban and Environmental Science, Unpublished Ph. D. Dissertation.
Görer N. (2001a). “Recommendations on Water and Waste Provisions in the draft law of Local Administrations”, Research Journal of Labour, vol. 7:57.
Görer N. (2001b). “Evaluation of Global Policies on Water Supply and Swerage Sectors”, Journal of Contemporary Local Administration, vol. 10/2:18–30, TODAIE.
Görer N. (2001c). “Multi-national Water Companies and Antalya Case” Symposium of Local Administrations and Urbanization, The Union of Engineer and Architecture Chamber of Mechanical Engineers, September, 8–9, Antalya.
Gustafsson L. and A. Svensson. (1999). Reform in Sweden Liberal Economy.
Güler B. A. (1999). Local-Global: Power of Foreign Credits, Local Agenda no: 3, pp. 6–23.
HABITAT (1999). “Basic Facts on Urbanization”, The City Agency of the United Nation:15.
Herbert A. and E. Kempson. (1995). “Water Debt and Disconnection”, Policy Studies Institute, London.
Juhsz A. (2001). “Bolivian Water War Presents Alternative to Globalization of Water” International Forum on Globalization (IFG) Bulletin, Special Water Issue.
Prasad S. and C. Ramachandraiah. (1999). “New Economic Policy Implications for Water”, Economic and Political Weekly, May 22, pp. 1251–1256,
SIS (State Institution of Statistics) (1994). Municipality Environmental Documentary database for “Drinking and Use Water”, Department of Environmental Statistics, Ankara.
SIS (State Institution of Statistics) (1994). Municipality Environmental Documentary database for “Drinking and Use Water”, Department of Environmental Statistics, Ankara.
SIS (State Institution of Statistics) (2001). “Electricity, Gas and Water Statistics in 1998”, Ankara.
Smets H. (1999). “Implementing the Right to Dringing Water in OECD Countries”, OECD Seminar on the Social and Environment Interface, TA 1251:22/l 1/99–12/01/00.
SPO (State Planning Organization) (2000). Five Years Development Plan 2001–2005, Ankara, Turkey.
Thames Water (1999). Annual Report <http://www.thames-water.com>.
TODAIE-YYAEM (1999). Management of Urban Water Service: Antalya Case, TODAIE, Ankara.
Ward C. (1996). Sharing A Common Good, Reflected in Water: A Crisis of Social Responsibility, Cassell, U.K.
WHO (1972). “Development of Environmental Health Criteria for Urban Planning”, WHO Technical Report Series, No:511.
World Bank (1992). “Development and The Environment”, World Development Report, Washington D.C.
WHO (1994). “Infrastructure For Development”, World Development Report, Washington D.C.
WHO (1997). “Toolkits For Private Participation in Water and Sanitation”, online, <http://www. worldbank. org/html/fpd/wstoolkits/>.
WHO (1999). “Turkey Heads Off Water Problems in Coastal City”, online, < http://www.worldbankorg/html/extdr/extme/1732.htm>.
WHO (2002). “Building Institutions for Markets”, World Development Report, Washington D.C.
WHO (2002). “Involving the Private Sector in Water and Sanitation”, Prospectus, online, <http:www.worldbank.org/html/fpd/wstoolkits>.
World Water Council (2000). World Water Vision. Earscan, U.K.
Yaron G. (2000). “Final Frontier: A Working Paper on the Big 10 Global Water Corporations and the Privatization of the World’s Last Public Resource”, Citizens’ Council on Corporate Issues, Polaris Institute and the Council of Canadians.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2003 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Görer, N. (2003). Commercialization and Privatization of Urban Water and Sewerage Services In Turkey: Poverty Reduction View. In: Olcay Ünver, İ.H., Gupta, R.K., Kibaroğlu, A. (eds) Water Development and Poverty Reduction. Natural Resource Management and Policy, vol 25. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0423-8_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0423-8_10
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-5069-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-0423-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive