Skip to main content

Knowledge creation and codification in Italian Industrial Districts

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Economics of Science, Technology and Innovation ((ESTI,volume 29))

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to present an overview of the various mechanisms of knowledge creation, diffusion, and assimilation which are visible within the Italian local production systems. The term “local production system” adopted in this paper concerns that class of phenomena related to the spatial concentration of specialised industry, often defined in the economic and business literature as: industrial districts, multi-district areas, system-areas, local systems governed by leading networks firms, “clusters”, “milieux innovateurs”, and so on. The paper discusses the evolutionary pattern of tacit and codified knowledge within the institutional complexity of the Italian local systems, where not only firms are active agents in knowledge producing and distributing, but also local institutions contribute to the process of socialisation of information and knowledge.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • AA. VV. (1980)Macchine scuola industria Il Mulino, Bologna.

    Google Scholar 

  • Albertini S. and Pilotti L. (1996), (eds.)Reti di RetiCedam, Padua.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amin A. (1988), Specialisation without growth: small firms in an inner-city area of Naples, mimeo, University of Newcastle upon Tyne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amin A. (1991), These are not Marshallian times, in Camagni (eds.)Innovation networks: spatial perspectivesBelhaven Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amin A.(1993), The difficult transition from informal to Marshallian district, mimeo, University of Newcastle upon Tyne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amin A. and Robins K. (1990), Industrial districts and regional development: limits and possibilities, in Pyke F, Becattini G. and Sengenberger W. (eds.)Industrial Districts and Inter-firm Co-operation in ItalyGenevre, Ilo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anastasia B., Core’ G. and Crestanello P. (1993), Problemi di individuazione dei distretti industrialiOltre il ponteno. 42, p. 24–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Antonelli C. (1994), Technological districts, localised spillovers, and productivity growth. The Italian evidence on technological externalities in the core regionsInternational Review of Applied Economicsvol. 8, no. I, p. 31–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Antonelli C. (1986), Technological districts and regional innovation capacityRevue d’Economie Régionale et Urbaineno.5, p. 695–705.

    Google Scholar 

  • Antonelli C. (1999)The Microdynamics of Technological ChangeRoutledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Antonelli C. (2000), Collective knowledge communication and innovation: the evidence of technological districtsRegional Studiesvol. 34, no. 6, p. 535–547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arora A. and Gambardella A. (1994), The changing technology of technological change: general and abstract knowledge and the division of innovative labourResearch Policyvol. 23, p. 523–532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Argyris C. and Schön D. (1974)Theory in practiceJossey-Bass, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow K. (1962), The economic implication of learning by doingReview of Economic Studiesvol. 29, p. 155–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arrow K. (1994), The production and distribution of knowledge, in Silverberg G. and Soete L.(eds.)The Economics of Growth and Technical ChangeEdward Elgar, Cheltenham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch D. and Feldman M. (1994), R&D spillover and the geography of innovation production,Discussion Paper, FS IV 94–2, Berlin, Wissenschaftszentrum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bagella M. and Becchetti L. (2000), (eds.), The Competitive Advantage of Industrial Districts, Theoretical and Empirical Analysis, Physica, Heidelberg.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bartolozzi P. (1993), Le politiche industriali e di sostegno all’impresa PM-Artigianato delle Autorità regionali in Emilia Romagna, Marche, Toscana, Veneto, Friuli, mimeo, Ires Bologna, Emilia Romagna.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartolozzi P. and Garibaldo F. (1995), (eds.)Lavoro creativo e impresa efficiente. Ricerca nulle piccole e medie impreseEsi, Rome.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becattini G. (1979), Dal settore industriale al distretto industriale. Alcune considerazioni sull’unitàdi indagine in economia industrialeEconomia e Politica Industrialeno. 1, p. 7–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becattini G. (1987)Mercato e forze locali: il distretto industrialeIl Mulino, Bologna.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becattini G. (1989)Modelli locali di sviluppo Il Mulino, Bologna.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becattini G. and Rullani E. (1996), Local systems and global connections: the role of knowledge, in, Cossentino F., Pyke F. and Sengenberger W. (eds.)Local regional response to global pressure: the case of ItalyIIo,Geneva.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellandi M. (1989), Capacità innovative diffuse e sistemi locali di imprese, in, Becattini, (ed.), cit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellandi M. (1992), The incentives to decentralised industrial creativity in local systems of small firmsRevue d’economie industrielleno. 59, p. 99–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bellandi M. (1993), Structure and change in the industrial districtStudi e discussionino. 85, Department of Economic Science, University of Florence.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellandi M. and Russo M. (1994), (eds.)Distretti industriali e cambiamento economico localeRosenberg & Sellier, Turin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belussi F. (1979)Il settore termomeccanico a VeronaGrafiche Cierre, Verona.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belussi F. (1988), (ed.)Innovazione tecnologica ed economie localiFranco Angeli, Milan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belussi F. (1992), (ed.)Nuovi modelli di impresa gerarchie organizzative ed imprese reteFranco Angeli, Milan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belussi F. (1996), Local systems, industrial districts and institutional networks: towards a new evolutionary paradigm of industrial economics?European Planning Studiesvol. 4, no. 3, p. 526.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belussi F. (1999a), The generation of localised technological change through communication processes. The case of the packaging machinery industry in the Bologna district, Inloco, mimeo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belussi F. (1999b), Path dependency vs. industrial dynamics: an analysis of two heterogeneous districtsHuman Systems Managementvol. 18, no. 2, p. 161–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belussi F. (1999c), Policies for the development of knowledge-intensive local production systemsCambridge Journal of Economicsvol. 23, no. 6, p. 729–747.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belussi F. (2000a), Accumulation of tacit knowledge and division of cognitive labour in the industrial district/local production systemWorking Paper On Economics and Evolution Max Planck Institute#0012

    Google Scholar 

  • Belussi F. (2000b), (ed.)Tacchi a spillo. Il distretto calzaturiero della Riviera del Brenta come forma organizzata di capitale socialeCleup, Padua.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belussi F. and Festa M. (1990), L’impresa rete del modelo veneto: dal post-fordismo al toyotismo? Alcune note illustrative sulle strutture organizzative dell’indotto BenettonOltre il Pontevol. 31, p. 3–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belussi F. and Arcangeli F. (1998), A typology of networks: flexible and evolutionary firmsResearch Policyvol. 27, p. 415–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belussi F. and Gottardi G. (2000), Model of localised technological change, in, Belussi F. andGottardi G. (eds.)Evolutionary Patterns of Local Industrial SystemsAshgate, Aldershot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benko G. and Lipietz A. (1992), (eds.)Les régions qui gagnentPresses Universitaires de France,Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bigarelli D. (2000), Il distretto di Carpi negli anni ‘80Small BusinessSpecial Issue “Il futuro dei distretti”, Belussi F., Gottardi G. and Rullani E. (eds.), vol. 2, p. 23–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biggiero L. (1998), Italian industrial districts: the triple helix of problem solvingIndustry and Higher Educationvol. 4, p. 167–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biggiero L. (1999), Markets, hierarchies, networks, and districts: a cybernetic approachHuman System Managementvol. 18, no. 2, p. 71–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biggiero L. (2000), The location of multinationals in industrial districts: knowledge transfer in biomedical“Journal of Technology Transfervol. 27, p. 111–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bozzi C. and Bramanti A. (1994), Struttura ed evoluzione di un settore dinamico: il caso degli antifurti nella provincia di VareseQuaderno no. 2 Collana OsservatorioBocconi University, Milan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bramanti A. and Semi L. (1994), Cambiamenti strutturali, connessioni locali e “strutture di governo” in tre sistemi locali della Lombardia del nord-ovest, Quaderno Opes no. 5, Bocconi University, Milan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brenner T. (2001), Self-organisation, local Symbiosis of firms and the life cycle of localised industrial clusters, paper presented at the seminar “Localised Industrial Clusters”, 31st January, Max Planck Institute for Research into Economic Systems, Jena.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breschi S. and Malerba F. (1997), Sectoral innovation systems: technological regimes, Schumpeterian dynamics and spatial boundaries, in Edquist C. (ed.)Systems of InnovationCassel, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brusco S. (1989)Piccola impresa e distretti industrialiRosenberg & Sellier, Turin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capecchi V. (1990), A history of flexible specialisation of industrial districts in Emilia Romagna,in Pyke F, Becattini G. and Sengenberger W. (eds.)Industrial Distinct and Inter-firm Co-operation in ItalyIlo, Geneva.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlsson B. and Eliasson G. (1994), The nature and importance of economic competenceIndustry and Corporate Changevol. 3, no. 3, p. 687–711.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carminucci C. and Casucci S. (1997), Il ciclo di vita dei distretti industriali. Ipotesi teoriche ed evidenze empiricheL’Industriano. 18, p. 283–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandler A. D. (1990)Scale and Scope. The Dynamics of CapitalismThe Bellknap Press, Cambridge Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen W. and Levinthal D. (1989), Innovation and learning: the two faces of R&DEconomic Journalvol. 99, p. 569–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen W. and Levinthal D. (1990), Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovationAdministrative Science Quarterlyvol. 35, p. 128–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooke P. (1994), Building a 21st century regional economy in Emilia Romagna, paper presented at the conference “Industrial districts and local development in Italy: challenges and policy perspectives, Bologna 2nd-3rd, May.

    Google Scholar 

  • Core) G., Gurisatti P. and Rossi A. (1998), Il distretto sport system di Montebelluna, in Core) G. and Rullani E. (eds.)Percorsi locali di internazionalizzazione. Competenze e autoorganizazione nei distretti industriali del Nord-estFranco Angeli, Milan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cossentino F., Pyke F. and Sengenberger W. (eds.), (1996)Local and regional response to global pressure: the case of Italy and its industrial districtsIlo, Geneva.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowan R. and Foray D. (1997), The economics of codification and the diffusion of knowledge.Industrial and Corporate Changevol. 6, no. 3, p. 595–622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowan R., David P. and Foray D. (2000), The explicit economics of knowledge codification and tacitnessIndustrial and Corporate Changevol. 9, no. 2, p. 211–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • David P. and Foray D (1995), Accessing and expanding the science and technology knowledge-based economySTI Reviewno. 16, p. 69–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dei Ottati G. (1994), Trust, interlinking transactions, and credit in the industrial districtsCambridge Journal of Economicsvol. 18, no. 6, p. 529–546.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dei Ottati G. (1995)Tra mercato e comunità: aspetti concettuali e ricerche empiriche sul distretto industrialeFranco Angeli, Milan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dei Ottati G. (1996), Economic changes in the district of Prato in the 1980s: towards a moreconscious and organised industrial districtEuropean Planning Studies4, p. 35–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denzau A. and North D. (1994), Shared mental models: ideologies and institutionsKyklosvol.47, no. 1, p. 3–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Ercole M. (1992), Il distretto di Casarano, in Onida F. Viesti G. and Falzoni M. (eds.)I distretti industriali: crisi o evoluzione?Egea, Milan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Bernardo B. (1991)La dimensione di impresa: scala scopo varietàFranco Angeli, Milan. Dosi G. et al. (1988), (eds.)Technical Change and Economic TheoryPinter, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutch E. and Pezzi A. (2000), I distretti industriali di fronte alla sfida della globalizzazione: sonoin grado di apprendere da altre realtà?Small BusinessSpecial Issue, Il futuro dei distretti

    Google Scholar 

  • Belussi F., Gottardi G. and Rullani E. (eds.), vol. 2, p. 141–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falzoni A., Onida F., and Viesti G. (1992), (eds.)I distretti industriali: crisi o evoluzione?Milan, Egea.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foray D. and Freeman C. (1993), (eds.)Technology and the Wealth of Nations. The Dynamics of Constructed AdvantagesPinter, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fransman M. (1994), Information, knowledge, vision and theories of the firmIndustrial and Corporate Changevol. 3, no. 3, p. 713–757.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman C. (1982)The Economics of Industrial InnovationPinter, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garofoli G. (1983), Le aree-sistema in ItaliaPolitica ed economiavol. 11, p. 57–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garofoli G. (1992), Les systèmes de petites entreprises: un cas paradigmatique de développement endogène, in Benko G. and Lipietz A. (eds.), cit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert M. and Cordey-Hayes M. (1990), Understanding the process of knowledge transfer toachieve successful technological innovationTechnovationvol.16, no. 6, p. 301–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilly J.P. and Grossetti M. (1993), Organisations, individus et territoires, le cas des systèmeslocaux d’innovationRevue d’Economie Régionale et Urbaineno. 3, p. 449–468.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gobbo F. (1989), (ed.)Distretti e sistemi produttivi alla soglia degli anni ‘80Franco Angeli,Milan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon R. (1992), State, milieu, network: systems of innovation in Silicon Valley, paper presented at the workshop “Systems of Innovations”, October 5–6, Bologna.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottardi G. (1996), Technology strategies and innovation without R&DJournal of Industry studiesvol. 2, p. 119–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grandinetti R. (1999)Il seggiolaio e l’economa globale La transizione evolutiva del distretto friulano della sedia attraverso i risultati di un’indagine di campoCedam, Padua.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guerra P. (1998), I sistemi produttivi mobiliers del Livenza e del Quartier del Piave, in Cord G. and Rullani E. (ed.)Percorsi locali di internazionalizzazione. Competenze e autoorganizazione nei distretti industriali del Nord-estFranco Angeli, Milan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison B. (1990), Industrial districts: old wine in new bottles?, Working paper no. 90, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburg Pa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison B. (1994)The lean and the meanBasic Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek F. (1945), The use of knowledge in societyAmerican Economic Reviewvol. 35, p. 51930.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Hippel E. (1988)The Sources of InnovationOxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirst P. and Zeitlin J. (1992), Specializzazione flessibile e post-fordismo: realtà e implicazioni politiche, in Belussi (ed.), cit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Istat (1995), Indagine sull’innovazione tecnologica, Anni 1990–92, RomeNotiziarioseries 4, Sheet 41, June.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson B. and Lundvall B. (2001), Why all this fuss about codified and tacit knowledge, paper presented at the DRUD Conference, January 18–20, Copenhagen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirzner I. (1979)Perception Opportunity and Profit. Studies in the Theory of Entrepreneurship University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane D.et al.(1996), Choice and action,Journal of Evolutionary Economics, vol. 6, p. 43–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lissoni F. and Metcalfe J.S. (1994), Diffusion of innovation ancient and modern. A review of themain themes, in Dodgson M. and Rothwell R. (eds.)The Handbook of Industrial InnovationEdward Elgar, Gower House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loasby B. (1996), The organisation of industry and the growth of knowledgeLectiones JenensesHeft 7, Max Planck Institut zur Erforschung von Wirtschaftssystemen, Jena.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loasby B. (1998), Industrial districts as knowledge communities, in Bellet M. and L’Harmet C. (eds.)Industry Space and CompetitionEdward Elgar, Cheltenham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lombardi M. (1994), Meccanismi evolutivi nella dinamica dei sistemi di imprese, Ricerca di BaseQuaderni dell’Università Bocconino. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lombardi M. (2000a), The cognitive approach to the study of local production systems, in, Belussi F. and Gottardi G. (2000), (eds.)Evolutionary Patterns of Local Industrial SystemsAshgate, Aldershot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lombardi M. (2000b), Learning and organisational structures, paper presented at the Padua Seminar, “Evolution, complexity, and institutions”, 7thDecember.

    Google Scholar 

  • Longhi C. and Quéré M. (1993), Systèmes de production et d’innovation, et dynamique des territoriesRevue économiquevol. 44, no. 4, p. 713–725.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucchini A and Martini A (1992), in Onida F., Viesti G., and Falzoni M. (eds.)I distretti industriali: crisi o evoluzione?Egea, Milan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundvall B. (1988), The user-supplier relationship, Aalborg Working paper, no. 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundvall B. (1996a), The social dimension of the learning economyDruid working papers96–1, p. 22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundvall B. (1996b), Information technology in the learning economy-challenges for development strategies, memorandum for United Nations Commission for Science and Technology, mimeo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundvall B. and Johnson B. (1994), The Learning EconomyIndustry Studiesno. 2. p. 23–42. Lundvall B. and Borrás S. (1997)The Globalising Learning Economy Implication For Innovation PoliciesDGXII, Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKenzie D. and Spinardi G. (1995), Tacit knowledge, weapon design and the unconvention of nuclear weaponsAmerican Journal of Sociologyvol. 101, no. I, p. 44–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahajan V. and Wind Y. (1986)Innovation Diffusion of New Product AcceptanceBallinger Pub., Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malmberg A. and Maskell P. (1999), Guest editorial: localised learning and regional economic developmentEuropean Urban and Regional Studiesvol. 6, no. 3, p. 5–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mansfield E. (1961), Technical change and the rate of imitationEconometricavol. 29, p. 741–766.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marchi G. (1999)Reti e sistemi di piccole imprese. I produttori di macchine e impianti nel distretto ceramico di SassuloFranco Angeli, Milan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maskell P. (1999), Knowledge creation and diffusion in geographic clusters, Druid, Copenhagen, mimeo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maskell P. and Malmberg A. (1999), Localised learning and industrial competitivenessCambridge Journal of Economicsvol. 23, p.167–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Metcalfe J.S. and De Liso N. (1995), Innovation, capabilities, and knowledge: the epistemic connection, mimeo, University of Manchester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mistri M. (1993)Distretti industriali e mercato unico europeoFranco Angeli, Milan.Montedison Ufficio studi-Cranec Università Cattolica di

    Google Scholar 

  • Milano (1998), Il ruolo dei distretti industriali nel “made in Italy”, paper presented at the conference “Distretti industriali: la viaitaliana al lavoro e alto sviluppo”, Milan, 17th February.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moussanet M. and Paolazzi L. (1992), (eds.)Gioielli bambole,coltelli. Viaggio nei distretti produttivi italianiIl Sole 24- Ore, Milan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson R. and Winter S. (1982)An Evolutionary Theory of Economic ChangeHarvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson R. (1995), Recent evolutionary theorising about economic changeJournal Economic Literaturevol. 33, March, p. 48–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nomisma (1991)Strategie e valutazione nella política industrialeFranco Angeli, Milan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka I. (1993), On a knowledge creating organisation, mimeo, paper presented at the Associazione nazionale Formatori, Parma, October 23rd-30th.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka I. and Takeuchi H. (1995)The Knowledge Creating CompanyOxford Univ. Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka I. and Konno N. (1998), The concept of `Ba“: building a foundation of knowledge creationCalifornia Management Reviewvol. 40, no. 30, p. 40–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka I., Umemoto K., and Senoo D. (1996), From information processing to knowledge creation: a paradigm shift in business managementTechnology in Societyvol. 18, no.2, p.203–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nooteboom B. (1999), Innovation, learning, and industrial organisationCambridge Journal of Economicsvol. 23, p.127–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nooteboom B. (2000), Managing exploitation and exploration, paper presentedat Workshop on Cognitive EconomicsAlessandria, 15–18th November.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nuti F. (1992) (ed.)1 distretti dell’industria manifatturiera in Italiavol. 1 and 2, Franco Angeli, Milan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paniccia I. (2001), Italian industrial districts: evolution and performance, paper presented at the Padua Seminar, “Evolution, complexity, and institutions”, 8`hFebruary.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papadia M. (1992), II distretto serico di Como, in Onida F., Viesti G., and Falzoni M. (eds.)I distretti industriali: crisi o evoluzione?Egea, Milan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parson S. (1997), Hayek and the limitation of knowledge: philosophical aspects, in Frowen S. (ed.)Hayek: Economist and Social PhilosopherMacmillan Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavitt K. (1984), Sectoral patterns of technical change: towards a taxonomy and a theoryResearch Policyvol.13, p. 343–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pilotti L. (1998), I distretti innovativi del nordSviluppo e Organizzazioneno. 187, p. 15–32. Polanyi M. (1958)Personal knowledgeRoutledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi M. (1967)The Tacit DimensionAnchor Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyke F, Becattini G., and Sengenberger W., (1990), (eds.)Industrial Districts and Inter-firm Cooperation in ItalyGeneva, Ilo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyke F. and Sengeberger W. (1992), (ed.)Industrial Districts and Local Economic RegenerationGeneva, Ilo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Revue d’Economie Régionale et Urbaine, (1993), numéro spécial, “Economie de proximités”, no. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quadrio Curzio A. and Fortis M. (2000), (eds.)Il made in Italy oltre il 2000Il Mulino, Bologna. Rogers E. (1962)Diffusion ofInnovationsThe Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg N. (1976)Perspectives on TechnologyCambridge University Press, Cambridge. Rosenberg N. (1982)Exploring the Black Box: Technology,Economics and HistoryCambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothwell R. (1994), Industrial innovation: success, strategy, trends, in Dodgson M. and Rothwell R. (eds.)Handbook of Industrial InnovationElgar, Gower.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rullani E. (1993), L’impresa minore nella teoria economica e nelle osservazioni empiricheRivista italiana di economia demografia e statistica47, no. 3–4, p. 29–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryle G. (1949), Knowing how and knowing that, inThe Concept of MindHutchinson University Library, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabel C. (1989), Flexible specialization and the re-emergence of regional economics, in Zeitlin J. (ed.), Local Industrial StrategiesEconomy and Societyvol. 18, no. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabel C. and Zeitlin J. (1982), Alternative storiche alla produzione di massaStato e Mercatono. 5, p. 213–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitz H. (1992), Industrial districts: models and reality in Baden-Württemberg Germany, in Pyke F. and Sengenberger W. (eds.)Industrial Districts and Local Economic RegenerationGeneva, Ilo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schön D. (1979), Generative Metaphor: a perspective on problem setting, in Ortony A (ed.)Metaphor and ThoughtCup, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senker J. (1995), Tacit knowledge and models of innovationIndustrial and Corporate Changevol. 4, no. 2, p. 425–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sforzi F. (1990), The Italian districts in the Italian economy, in Pyke F., Becattini G. andSengenberger W. (eds.)Industrial Districts and Inter-firm Cooperation in ItalyGeneva, Ilo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sforzi F. (1995), Elenco dei sistemi locali di piccola e media impresa 1991, paper presented atArtimino 11th September, “Lo sviluppo locale”, organised by Iris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Signorini L. (1994), The Price of Prato, or measuring the ID effectPapers in Regional Sciencevol. 73, p. 369–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silberstone A. (1989), (ed)Technology and Economic ProgressMacmillan, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith B. (1997), The connectionist mind: a study of Hayekian psychology, in Frowen F. (ed.)Hayek: Economist and Social Philosopher. A Critical RetrospectMacmillan, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soli M. (1998), Il sistema produttivo inox di Conegliano, in Corn G. and Rullani E. (eds.)Percorsi locali di internazionalizzazione. Competenze e auto-organizzazione nei distrettiindustriali del Nord-estFranco Angeli, Milan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz J.E. (1987), “Learning to learn, localized learning and technological progress”, in: Dasgupta P. and Stoneman P. (eds.)Economic Policy and Technological PerformanceCambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoneman P. (1983)The Economic Analysis of Technological ChangeOxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tamborini R. (1997), Knowledge and economic behaviour. A constructivist approachEvolutionary Economicsvol. 7, p. 49–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tamisari M. (2000), The evolution of the chair manufacturing industry in Friuli-Venezia-Giuilia, in, Belussi F. and Gottardi G. (eds.)Evolutionary Patterns of Local Industrial SystemsAshgate, Aldershot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teece D. and Pisano G. (1994), The dynamic capabilities of firms: an introductionIndustrial and Corporate Changevol. 3, no. 3, p. 537–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsoukas H. (1996), Forms of knowledge and forms of life in organised contextsWarwick Business SchoolWorking Papers, no. 171, p. 1–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vicari S. (1998)L ‘impresa creativaEtas, Milan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witt U. (1992), (ed.)Explaining Process and ChangeThe University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witt U. (1993), (ed.)Evolutionary EconomicsEdward Elgar, Cheltenham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witt U. (1996), Imagination and leadership — The neglected dimension of the (evolutionary) theory of the firmMax Planck Institute Working Papersno. 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witt U. (2000), Changing cognitive frames - Changing organisational forms. An Entrepreneurialtheory of organizational developmentMax Planck Institute Working Papersno. 7.

    Google Scholar 

  • You J. (1995), Small firms in economic theoryCambridge Journal of Economicsvol. 19, p. 441–462.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young A. (1993), Invention and bounded learning by doing, in Grossman G. (ed.)Economic growth: Theory and EvidenceEdward Elgar, Cheltenham.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Fiorenza Belussi Giorgio Gottardi Enzo Rullani

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Belussi, F., Pilotti, L. (2003). Knowledge creation and codification in Italian Industrial Districts. In: Belussi, F., Gottardi, G., Rullani, E. (eds) The Technological Evolution of Industrial Districts. Economics of Science, Technology and Innovation, vol 29. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0393-4_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0393-4_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-5054-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-0393-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics