Skip to main content

A Review of Enterprise Process Modelling Techniques

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Integrated Series in Information Systems ((ISIS,volume 3))

Abstract

Enterprises are becoming more distributed and collaborative as a result of rapid advances in telecommunications and Web-based technologies. The changing nature of enterprises has, in turn, led to research and development towards new techniques and products for the modelling, specification, monitoring, and operational control of business processes and enterprise functions. This chapter overviews several prominent enterprise process modeling techniques, illustrates their key features with the help of a common example, and points to the need for further process-modelling research to support the design/redesign and improvement of next-generation enterprises. This chapter ends with a brief account of recent research on the development of a new process-modelling framework and language.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Alpha/Sim ®, A General Purpose Discrete Event Simulation Tool, http://www.alphatek.com.

  • Alter, S., 2002, Information SystemsThe Foundation of E-Business, Prentice Hall, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benjamin, P., Delen, D., Mayer, R., and O’Brien, T., 2000, “A Model-Based Approach for Component Simulation Development,” Proceedings of the 2000 Winter Simulation Conference, J.A. Joines, R.R. Barton, K. Kang, and P.A. Fishwick (Eds.), IEEE, 1831–1839.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernus, P. and Nemes, L. (Eds.), 1996, Modeling and Methodologies for Enterprise Integration, Chapman & Hall, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernus, P., Nemes, L., and Morris, R., 1996, “The Meaning of an Enterprise Model,” in Modeling and Methodologies for Enterprise Integration, Bernus, P. and Nemes, L. (eds.), Chapman & Hall, UK, 183–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bond, B., Genovese, Y., Miklovic, D., Rayner, N., Wood, N. and Zrimsek, B., 2000, “ERP is Dead — Long Live ERP II,” Research Note, Gartner Group, October 4, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Booch, G. J. Rumbaugh, and I. Jacobson, 1999, The Unified Modeling Language User Guide, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bravoco, R.R. and Yadav, S.B., 1985, “Requirement Definition Architecture — An Overview,” Computers in Industry, 6, 237–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burch, J.G., 1992, Systems Analysis, Design, and Implementation, Boyd & Fraser, Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaugule, A., 2001, “A User-Oriented Enterprise Process Modeling Language,” MS Thesis, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ciardo, G., Muppala, J.K., and Trivedi, K.S., 1989, “SPNP: Stochastic Petri Net Package,” in Proc. of the International Workshop on Petri nets and Performance Models, IEEE, 142–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colquhoun, G.J., Baines, R.W., and Crossley, R., 1993, “A State of the Art Review of IDEF0,” International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 6, 252–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, R., and Slagmulder, R., 1999a, “Designing ABC Systems for Strategic Costing and Operational Improvement,” Strategic Finance, August, 18–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, R., and Slagmulder, R., 1999b, “Activity-Based Cost Management System Architecture—Part 1,” Strategic Finance, October, 12–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuenca, L., Hawa, M., and Ortiz, A., 1999, “Analysis of Architectural Issues in Enterprise Modelling: A Compared Analysis of DEM (Dynamic Enterprise Modelling) of Baan and CIMOSA (CIM — Open System Architecture),” Baan Brothers Foundation 2 nd Roundtable Proceedings, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curtis, B., Kellner, M.I., and Over, J., 1992, “Process Modeling,” Communications of the ACM, 35(9), 75–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dalal, N.P., Kamath, M., Kolarik, W.J., and Sivaraman, E. (2003), “Toward an Integrated Framework for Modeling Enterprise Processes,” Comm. of the ACM (forthcoming).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dao, K.L. and Rodjak, D., 1991, “CIM Flows from Data Flow Diagrams,” Manufacturing Systems, 67–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davenport, T.H., 1998, “Putting the Enterprise into the Enterprise System,” Harvard Business Review, July–August, 121–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • David, R. and Alla, H., 1991, “Petri Nets for Modeling Dynamic Systems” Automatica, 30(2), 175–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desrochers, A.A., and Al-Jaar, R.Y., 1994, Applications of Petri Nets in Manufacturing Systems, IEEE Control System Society: NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Didic, M., 1994, “CIMOSA Model Creation and Execution for a Casting Process and a Manufacturing Cell,” Computers in Industry, 24, 237–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferscha, A., 1998, “Optimistic Distributed Execution of Business Process Models,” Proceedings of 31 st Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 723–732.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, M.S., Chionglo, J.F., and Fadel, F.G., 1993, “A Common-Sense Model of the Enterprise,” Proceedings of the 2 nd Industrial Engineering Research Conference, 425–429.

    Google Scholar 

  • GERAM: Generalized Enterprise Reference Architecture and Methodology, Version 1.6.2, Annex to ISO WD15704, IFIP-IFAC Task Force.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruniger, M., and Fox, M., 1995, “The Logic of Enterprise Modeling,” In Proceedings of the Fourth Industrial Engineering Research Conference, 747–758.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollingsworth, D., 1995, “The Workflow Reference Model,” published by the Workflow Management Coalition, Document TC00-1003, http://www.wfmc.org/standards/docs.htm.

  • Janssens, G.K., Vereist, J., and Weyn, B., 2000, “Techniques for Modeling Workflows and Their Support of Reuse,” in Business Process Management — Models Techniques and Empirical Studies, W. van der Aalst, J. Desel, and A. Oberweis (Eds.), Springer, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamath, M., Dalal, N., Kolarik, W., Chaugule, A., Sivaraman, E., and Lau, A., 2001, “Process-Modeling Techniques For Enterprise Analysis And Design: A Comparative Evaluation,” IERC 2001 Proceedings.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamath, M., Dalal, N., Kolarik, W., Lau, A., Sivaraman, E., Chaugule, A., Choudhury, S., Gupta, A., and Channahalli, R., 2002a, “An Integrated Framework For Process And Performance Modeling Of Next-Generation Enterprise Systems: Design And Development Issues” Proc. of the University Synergy Program (USP) Conf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamath, M., Dalal, N., and Chinnanchetty, R., 2002b, “The Application of XML-Based Markup Languages in Enterprise Process Modeling,” IERC 2002 Proceedings.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamath, M., and Viswanadham, N., 1986, “Applications of Petri Net Based Models in the Modeling and Analysis of Flexible Manufacturing Systems,” in Modeling and Analysis of Flexible Manufacturing Systems, A. Desrochers, (eds), IEEE, 262–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kateel, G., Kamath, M., and Pratt, D., 1996, “An Overview Of CIM Enterprise Modeling Methodologies,” Proceedings of the 1996 Winter Simulation Conference, IEEE, 1000–1007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, G. and Detering, S., 1996, “Process-Oriented Modeling and Analysis of Business Processes Using the R/3 Reference Model,” in Modelling and Methodologies for Enterprise Integration, Bernus, P. and Nemes, L. (eds.), Chapman & Hall, 69–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knowles, G., 1999, “Next Generation Enterprise Modeling: A Step Beyond Baan Application Modeling,” Baan Brothers Foundation 2 nd Roundtable Proc, The Netherlands, 95–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolarik W., 1995, Creating Quality: Concepts, Systems, Strategies, and Tools, McGraw-Hill, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolarik, W., 1999, Creating Quality: Process Design for Results, McGraw-Hill, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kosanke, K., 1995, “CIMOSA — Overview and Status,” Computers in Industry, 27, 101–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mertins, K., Jochem, R., and Jakel, F.-W., 1997, “A Tool for Object-oriented Modeling and Analysis of Business Processes,” Computers in Industry, 33, 345–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mertins, T., Susseguth, W. and Jochem, R., 1992, “An Object Oriented Method for Integrated Enterprise Modeling as a Basis for Enterprise Co-ordination,” Enterprise Integration Modeling: Proceedings of the First International Conference, MIT Press, MA, 249–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millet, I., 1999, “A Proposal to Simplify Data Flow Diagrams,” IBM Sys Journal, 38, 118–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murata, T. 1989, “Petri Nets: Properties, Analysis and Applications,” Proc.eedings of the IEEE, 77, 541–580.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, J.L., 1981, Petri Net Theory and the Modeling of Systems, Prentice-Hall, Inc., NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radding, A., 1999, “ERP, Componentization and E-commerce,” available at http://www.itmanagement.earthweb.eom/erp/print/0,,11981_616621,00.html.

  • Sagoo, J.S. and Boardman, J.T., 1998, “Towards the Formalisation of Soft Systems Models using Petri Net Theory,” IEE Proc. on Control Theory & Applications, Vol. 145, 463–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, M., Patro, S. and Kolarik, W., 1998, “Process Redesign/Redefinition in Small Enterprises,” IE Research 98 Conference Proceedings, CD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarjoughian, H.S., Zeigler, B.P., Park, S., 2000, “Collaborative Distributed Network System: A Lightweight Middleware Supporting Collaborative DEVS Modeling,” Future Generation Computer Systems, 17, 89–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schader, M. and Korthaus, A., 1998, “Modeling Business Processes As Part Of The Booster Approach To Business Object-Oriented System Development Based On UML,” IEEE Proc. of the Second International Workshop on Enterprise Distributed Object Computing, 56–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheer, A.-W., 1992, “Architecture of Integrated Information Systems: Foundations of Enterprise Modelling,” Springer-Verlag, Berlin.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sheth, A., Aalst, W.M.P., and Arpinar, I. (1999), “Processes Driving the Networked Economy,” IEEE Concurrency, 7(3), 18–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Aalst, W.M.P., 1997, “Verification of Workflow Nets,” in Application and Theory of Petri Nets 1997, volume 1248 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, P. Azema, and G, Balbo (eds.), Springer — Verlag, Berlin, Germany, 407–426.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • van der Aalst, W.M.P., 1998, “The Application of Petri Nets to Workflow Management,” The Journal of Circuits, Systems and Computers, 8(1), 21–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Aalst, W.M.P., 1999a, “Formalization and Verification of Event-driven Process Chains,” Information and Software Technology, 41(10), 639–650.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Aalst, W.M.P., 1999b, “Interorganizational Workflows,” Systems Analysis, Modeling, Simulation, 34(3), 335–374.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Aalst, W.M.P. and Hee, K., 2002, Workflow Management: Models, Methods, and Systems, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Rijst, N., 1997, “Dynamic Enterprise Modeling Development Method: Guidelines and Conventions,” User Manual, Baan Business Innovation, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vernadat, F.B., 1996, “CIM Business Process and Enterprise Activity Modeling,” in Modeling and Methodologies for Enterprise Integration, P. Bernus, and L. Nemes, (eds.), Chapman & Hall, UK, 170–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • WfMC, 1999, “Terminology & Glossary,” published by the Workflow Management Coalition, Document WFMC-TC-1011, http://www.wfmc.org/standards/docs.htm.

  • Whitman, L., Huff, B., and Presley, A., 1997, “Structured Models and Dynamic Systems Analysis: The Integration of IDEF)/IDEF3 Modeling Methods and Discrete Event Simulation,” Proceedings of the 1997 Winter Simulation Conference, S. Andradottir, K.J. Healy, D.H. Withers, and B.L. Nelson (Eds.), IEEE, 518–524.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitten, J.L., Bentley, L.D., and Dittman, K.C., 2001, Systems Analysis and Design Methods, Irwin/McGraw-Hill, Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zelm, M., Vernadat, F.B., and Kosanke, K., 1995, “The CIMOSA Business Modeling Process,” Computers in Industry, 27, 123–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zurawski, R. and Zhou, M.C., 1994, “Petri Nets and Industrial Applications: A Tutorial,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 41 (6), 567–583.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kamath, M., Dalal, N.P., Chaugule, A., Sivaraman, E., Kolarik, W.J. (2003). A Review of Enterprise Process Modelling Techniques. In: Prabhu, V., Kumara, S., Kamath, M. (eds) Scalable Enterprise Systems. Integrated Series in Information Systems, vol 3. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0389-7_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0389-7_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-5052-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-0389-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics