Dynamic Profiling and Canonical Modeling

Powerful Partners in Metabolic Pathway Identification
  • Eberhard O. Voit
  • Jonas Almeida


Biological research attempts to answer the question: How do organisms function? Once we can answer this question, we can explain our natural surroundings and begin to change them in a targeted fashion that offers us benefit, may it be in medicine, agriculture, biotechnology, or a responsible exploitation of the environment. The challenge is that we were not provided with a blueprint of the inner workings of organisms. We have very many observational data, but they are almost always mere snapshots of some parts of some organisms under some more or less controlled conditions. Often these snapshots are clustered in some interesting corner of the biological universe, but more often they are separated by gaping holes in our knowledge. Our task is then to interpolate between rather scarce data in order to construct a picture that matches the observations and, more interestingly, explains what lies between and beyond.


Genetic Algorithm Metabolic Profile Metabolic Network Mixed Integer Linear Programming Kinetic Order 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Abu-Mostafa YS. The Vapnik-Chervonenkis dimension: information versus complexity in learning. Neural Computat 1: 312–317 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Akutsu T, Miyano S, Kuhara S. Inferring qualitative relations in genetic networks and metabolic pathways. Bioinformatics 16: 727–734 (2000).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Almeida JS. Predictive non-linear modeling of complex data by artificial neural networks. Curr Opin Biotechnol in pressspi (2002).Google Scholar
  4. Almeida JS, Reis MAM, Carrondo MJT. Competition between nitrate and nitrite reduction in denitrification by Pseudomonas fluorescens. Biotechnol Bioeng 46: 476–484 (1995).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Alves R, Savageau M. Extending the method of mathematically controlled comparison to include numerical comparisons. Bioinformatics 16: 786–798 (2000).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Burden RL, Faires JD. Numerical Analysis. 5th Edn. pp. 156–167, PWS Publishing Co, Boston (1993).Google Scholar
  7. DiStefano III J J. The modeling methodology forum: an expanded department. Am J Physiol 248: C187–C188 (1985).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Garfinkel D. The role of computer simulation in biochemistry. Comp Biomed Res 2: 31–44 (1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Garfinkel D. Computer modeling, complex biological systems, and their simplifications. Am J Phys 239: R1–R6 (1980).Google Scholar
  10. Garfinkel D. Computer-based modeling of biological systems which are inherently complex: problems, strategies, and methods. Biomed Biochim Acta 44: 823–829 (1985).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Goodenowe DB. Metabolic network analysis: integrating comprehensive genomic and metabolomic data to understand development and disease (abstract). Cambridge Healthtech Institute Conference on Metabolic Profiling: Pathways in Discovery, Chapel Hill (2001).Google Scholar
  12. Hatzimanikatis V, Floudas CA, Bailey JE. Optimization of regulatory architectures in metabolic reaction networks. Biotechnol Bioeng 52: 485–500 (1996).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Heinrich R, Rapoport SM, Rapoport TA. Metabolic regulation and mathematical models. Prog Biophys Mol Bio 32: 1–82 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hernández-Bermejo B, Fairén V. Lotka-Volterra representation of general nonlinear systems. Math Biosci 140: 1–32 (1997).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Irvine DH, Savageau MA. Network regulation of the immune response. J Immunol 134: 2100–2130(1985).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Irvine DH, Savageau MA. Efficient solution of nonlinear ordinary differential equations expressed in S-system canonical form. SI AM J N timer Anal 27: 704–735 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jacquez, J A. Compartmental Analysis in Biology and Medicine. 3rd Edn. Thomson-Shore, Inc, Dexter, MI (1996).Google Scholar
  18. Kantz H, Schreiber T. Nonlinear Time Series Analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1997).Google Scholar
  19. Kikuchi S, Tominaga D, Masanori A, Tomita M. Pathway finding from given time-courses using genetic algorithm. Genome Informat 12: 304–305 (2001).Google Scholar
  20. Maki Y, Tominaga D, Okamoto M et al. Development of a system for the inference of large scale genetic networks. ProcPacific Symposium on Biocomputing. pp. 446–458, World Scientific, Singapore (2001).Google Scholar
  21. Michel, M. An Introduction to Genetic Algorithms. MIT Press, Cambridge (1998).Google Scholar
  22. Neves AR, Ramos A, Nunes MC et al. In vivo nuclear magnetic resonance studies of glycolytic kinetics in Lactococcus lactis. Biotechnol Bioeng 64: 200–212 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Neves AR, Ramos A, Shearman C et al. In vivo nuclear magnetic resonance studies of glycolytic kinetics in Lactococcus lactis. Eur J Biochem 267: 3859–3868 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Okamoto M, Morita Y, Tominaga D et al. Design of virtual-labo-system for metabolic engineering: development of biochemical engineering system analyzing tool-kit (BEST KIT). Comp Chem Engng 21: S745–S750 (1997).Google Scholar
  25. Oliveira JS, Bailey CG, Jones-Oliveira JB, Dixon DA. An algebraic-combinatorial model for the identification and mapping of biochemical pathways. Bull Mathem Biol 63: 1163–1196 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sakamoto E, Iba H. Inferring a system of differential equations for a gene regulatory network by using genetic programming. Proc 2001 Congress on Evolutionary Computing, CEC200L pp. 720–726, IEEE Press, Piscataway, NJ, (2001).Google Scholar
  27. Samoilov M, Arkin A, Ross J. On the deduction of chemical reaction pathways from measurements of time series of concentrations. Chaos 11: 108–114 (2001).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sands PJ, Voit EO. Flux-based estimation of parameters in S-systems. Ecol Model 93: 75–88 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Santos MM, Lemos PC, Reis MA, Santos H. Glucose metabolism and kinetics of phosphorus removal by the fermentative bacterium Microlunatus phosphovorus. Appl Environ Microbiol 65: 3920–3928 (1999).Google Scholar
  30. Savageau MA. Biochemical Systems Analysis, I. Some mathematical properties of the rate law for the component enzymatic reactions. J Theor Biol 25: 365–369 (1969a).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Savageau MA. Biochemical Systems Analysis, II. The steady-state solutions for an n-pool system using a power-law approximation. J Theor Biol 25: 370–379 (1969b).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Savageau MA. Biochemical Systems Analysis. A Study of Function and Design in Molecular Biology. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1976).Google Scholar
  33. Savageau MA. Growth equations: a general equation and a survey of special cases. Math Biosci 48: 267–278 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Savageau MA. A theory of alternative designs for biochemical control systems. Biomed Biochim Acta 44: 875–880 (1985).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Savageau MA, Voit EO. Recasting nonlinear differential equations as S-systems: a canonical nonlinear form. Math Biosci 87: 83–115 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sibjesma WFH, Almeida JS, Reis MAM, Santos H. Evidence for uncoupling effect of nitrite during of denitrification by Pseudomonas fluorescens: in vivo P-NMR study. Biotechnol Bioeng 52: 176–182 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sorribas A, Cascante M. Structure identifiability in metabolic pathways: parameter estimation in models based on the power-law formalism. Biochem J 298: 303–311 (1994).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Torres NV, Voit, EO. Pathway Analysis and Optimization in Metabolic Engineering. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, in press (2003).Google Scholar
  39. Voit EO (Ed). Canonical Nonlinear Modeling. S-System Approach to Understanding Complexity. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York (1991).Google Scholar
  40. Voit EO. Symmetries of S-systems. Math Biosci 109: 19–37 (1992).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Voit EO. Computational Analysis of Biochemical Systems. A Practical Guide for Biochemists and Molecular Biologists. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2000).Google Scholar
  42. Voit EO. Models-of-data and models-of-processes in the post-genomic era. Mathem. Biosci in pressspi (2002).Google Scholar
  43. Voit EO, Sands PJ. Modeling forest growth. I. Canonical approach. Ecol Model 86: 51–71 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Voit, EO, Savageau MA. Power-law approach to modeling biological systems; II. Application to ethanol production. J Ferment Technol 60: 229–232 (1982a).Google Scholar
  45. Voit EO, Savageau MA. Power-law approach to modeling biological systems; III. Methods of analysis. J Ferment Technol 60: 233–241 (1982b).Google Scholar
  46. V’Yugin, VV. Algorithmic complexity and stochastic properties of finite binary sequences. Comp J 42: 294–317 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Zhang Z, Voit EO, Schwacke LH. Parameter estimation and sensitivity analysis of S-systems using a genetic algorithm. In Methodologies for the Conception, Design, and Application of Intelligent Systems. YamakawaT, Matsumoto G (Ed) World Scientific, Singapore, (1996).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eberhard O. Voit
    • 1
  • Jonas Almeida
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Biometry and EpidemiologyGermany
  2. 2.Department of Biochemistry and Molecular BiologyMedical University of South CarolinaCharlestonUSA

Personalised recommendations