Wages, Productivity, and Technology: What Have We Learned from Micro Evidence for U.S. Manufacturing?

  • John Haltiwanger

Abstract

Striking changes in the structure of production, wages, and employment have occurred over the last several decades. The introduction of computers and, more generally, advanced technologies into the workplace is widely viewed as one of the major factors underlying these changes. In particular, the role of advanced technology and computers has been closely linked to the rising inequality of worker wages. One hypothesis is that the introduction of advanced technologies and/or computers has led to a rising demand for skilled workers that, in turn, has led to a rise in the wages of skilled workers relative to unskilled workers. A closely related hypothesis is that the introduction of advanced technologies and/or computers should have also been associated with rising productivity.

Keywords

Alan Berman Timothy 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Autor, David, Lawrence Katz, and Alan Krueger. 1998. Computing inequality: Have computers changed the labor market? Quarterly Journal of Economics 113:1169–1214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baily, Martin N., Charles Hulten, and David Campbell. 1992. The distribution of productivity in manufacturing plants. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity: Microeconomics: 187–268.Google Scholar
  3. Bartelsman, Eric J., and Wayne Gray. 1996. The NBER manufacturing productivity database. NBER Technical Working Paper No. 205.Google Scholar
  4. Berman, Eli, John Bound, and Zvi Griliches. 1994. Changes in the demand for skilled labor within U.S. manufacturing industries: Evidence from the Annual Survey of Manufacturing. Quarterly Journal of Economics 109:367–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berndt, Ernst R., and Catherine J. Morrison. 1992. High-tech capital formation and aggregate economic performance in U.S. manufacturing industries: An exploratory analysis. NBER Working Paper.Google Scholar
  6. Bresnahan, Timothy, Erik Brynjolfsson, and Lorin Hitt. 1998. Information technology, workplace organization, and the demand for skilled labor: Firm-level evidence. Mimeographed.Google Scholar
  7. Caselli, Francesco. 1999. Technological revolutions. American Economic Review 89:78–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cooper, Russell, John Haltiwanger, and Laura Power. 1999. Machine replacement and the business cycle: Lumps and bumps. American Economic Review 89 (September): 921–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Davis, Steve J., and John Haltiwanger. 1991. Wage dispersion between and within U.S. manufacturing plants, 1963–1986. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity: Microeconomics: 115–200.Google Scholar
  10. -. 1996. Employer size and the wage structure in U.S. manufacturing. Annales D’Economie et de Statistique 41/42: 323–367.Google Scholar
  11. Doms, Mark, Timothy Dunne, and Kenneth Troske. 1997. Workers, wages, and technology. Quarterly Journal of Economics 112: 253–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dunne, Timothy, Lucia Foster, John Haltiwanger, and Kenneth Troske. 2001. Wage and productivity dispersion in U.S. manufacturing: The role of computer investment. NBER Working Paper No. 7465 (revised).Google Scholar
  13. Dunne, Timothy, John Haltiwanger, and Kenneth R. Troske. 1997. Technology and jobs: Secular change and cyclical dynamics. Carnegie-Rochester Public Policy Conference Series 46:107–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dwyer, Douglas. 1995. Whittling away at productivity dispersion. Center for Economic Studies Working Paper No. 95-5.Google Scholar
  15. Foster, Lucia, John Haltiwanger, and C.J. Krizan. Aggregate productivity growth: Lessons from microeconomic evidence. In New developments in productivity analysis, edited by Dean, Hulten, and Harper. Chicago: NBER/University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  16. Goldin, Claudia, and Robert Margo. 1992. The great compression: The wage structure in the United States at mid-century. Quarterly Journal of Economics 107:1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Greenan, Nathalie, and Jacques Mairesse. 1996. Computers and productivity in France: Some evidence. NBER Working Paper No. 5836.Google Scholar
  18. Haltiwanger, John C., Julia I. Lane, and James R. Spletzer. 1999. Productivity differences across employers: The role of employer size, age, and human capital. American Economic Review 89 (May): 94–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. -. 2000. Wages, productivity, and the dynamic interaction of businesses and workers. NBER Working Paper No. 7994.Google Scholar
  20. Hopenhayn, Hugo. 1992. Entry, exit, and firm dynamics in the long run equilibrium. Econometrica 60 (September): 1127–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hopenhayn, Hugo, and Richard Rogerson. 1993. Job turnover and policy evaluation: A general equilibrium analysis. Journal of Political Economy 101 (October): 915–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jovanovic, Boyan. 1982. Selection and the evolution of industry. Econometrica 50 (May): 649–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Juhn, Chinhui, Kevin M. Murphy, and Brooks Pierce. 1993. Wage inequality and the rise in the return to skill. Journal of Political Economy 101:410–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Katz, Lawrence F., and Kevin Murphy. 1992. Changes in relative wages, 1963–1987: Supply and demand factors. Quarterly Journal of Economics 107:35–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kremer, Michael, and Eric Maskin. 1996. Wage inequality and segregation by skill. NBER Working Paper No. 5718.Google Scholar
  26. Krueger, Alan. 1993. How computers changed the wage structure: Evidence from microdata, 1984–89. Quarterly Journal of Economics 108:33–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lichtenberg, Frank R. 1992. The output contributions of computer equipment and personnel: A firm-level analysis. NBER Working Paper, No. 4540.Google Scholar
  28. Lucas, Robert. 1977. On the size distribution of firms. Bell Journal of Economics 9:508–23.Google Scholar
  29. Morrison, Catherine, and Ernst R. Berndt. 1991. Assessing the productivity of information technology equipment in U.S. manufacturing industries. NBER Working Paper No. 3582.Google Scholar
  30. Oliner, Stephen, and Daniel Sichel. 1994. Computers and output growth revisited: How big is the puzzle? Brookings Paper on Economic Activity: Microeconomics 2:273–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Olley, Steven, and Ariel Pakes. 1996. The dynamics of productivity in the telecommunications equipment industry. Econometrica 64:1263–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Siegel, Donald. 1997. The impact of computers on manufacturing productivity growth: A multiple-indicators, multiple-causes approach. Review of Economic Statistics 79:68–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Troske, Kenneth R. 1996. A note on computer investment in U.S. manufacturing. Center for Economic Studies, U.S. Bureau of the Census. Mimeographed.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • John Haltiwanger
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Center for Economic StudiesUniversity of MarylandUSA
  2. 2.Bureau of the CensusUSA

Personalised recommendations