Skip to main content

Accuracy Assessment of Maps of Forest Condition

Statistical Design and Methodological Considerations

  • Chapter
Remote Sensing of Forest Environments

Abstract

No thematic map is perfect. Some pixels or polygons are not accurately classified, no matter how well the map is crafted. Therefore, thematic maps need metadata that sufficiently characterize the nature and degree of these imperfections. To decision-makers, an accuracy assessment helps judge the risks of using imperfect geospatial data. To analysts, an accuracy assessment helps describe the reliability of the map for geospatial analyses and modeling, and the distribution of different types of “true” land cover within each mapped category. To producers of thematic maps, an accuracy assessment measures the degree of technical success for alternative algorithms or techniques. To project managers, an accuracy assessment helps determine contract compliance or measure performance of technical staff.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Campbell, J.B. (1996). Introduction to Remote Sensing (2rd ed.). Guilford Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cochran, W. G. (1977). Sampling Techniques (3rd ed.). John Wiley & Sons, New York.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Congalton, R. G. (1991). A review of accessing the accuracy of classifications of remotely sensed data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 37, 35–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Czaplewski, R. L. (1992). Misclassification bias in areal estimates. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 58, 189–192

    Google Scholar 

  • Czaplewski, R. L. (1994). Variance approximations for assessments of classification accuracy. Research Paper RM-316. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station.

    Google Scholar 

  • Czaplewski, R. L., & Catts, G. P. (1992). Calibration of remotely sensed proportion or area estimates for misclassification error. Remote Sensing of Environment, 39, 29–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Czaplewski, R. L. (2000). Accuracy assessments and areal estimates using two-phase stratified random sampling, cluster plots, and the multivariate composite estimator. Quantifying Spatial Uncertainty in Natural Resources: Theory and Applications for GIS and Remote Sensing, 79–100. Ann Arbor Press, Chelsea, MI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gopal, S., & Woodcock, C. (1994). Theory and methods for accuracy assessment of thematic maps using fuzzy-sets. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 60, 181–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudson, W. D., & Ramm, C. W. (1987). Correct formulation of the kappa coefficient of agreement. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 53, 421–422.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, C. J. (1999) Statistical Analysis of Categorical Data (3rd ed.). John Wiley & Sons, New York.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Lohr, S. L. (1999). Sampling: Design and Analysis. Brooks/Cole Publishing, Pacific Grove, CA.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Salant, P., & Dillman, D. A. (1994). How to conduct your own survey. John Wiley & Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Särndal, C. -E., Swensson, B., & Wretman, J. (1992). Model-assisted survey sampling. Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Schreuder, H. T., Gregoire, T. G., & Wood, G. (1993) Sampling methods for multiresource forest inventory. John Wiley & Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stehman, S.V. (1996), Estimating the kappa coefficient and its variance under stratified random sampling, Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 62, 401–407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stehman, S.V. (2002). Response to letter by G. Turk on chance correction and map evaluation. Remote Sensing of Environment, 82, 4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stehman, S. V., & Czaplewski, R. L. (1998). Design and analysis for thematic map accuracy assessment: fundamental principles. Remote Sensing of Environment, 64, 331–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stehman, S. V. (2001). Statistical rigor and practical utility in thematic map accuracy assessment. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 67, 727–734.

    Google Scholar 

  • Story, M., & Congalton, R. G. (1986). Accuracy assessment: a user’s perspective. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 52,397–399.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Czaplewski, R.L. (2003). Accuracy Assessment of Maps of Forest Condition. In: Wulder, M.A., Franklin, S.E. (eds) Remote Sensing of Forest Environments. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0306-4_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0306-4_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-5014-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-0306-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics