Abstract
The consequences of many policies are complicated and difficult to foresee. In the Netherlands, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis (CPB) assists the government with assessing the consequences of economic policy. In addition, CPB calculates the economic consequences of party programmes before each election for parliament. The main objective of this chapter is to provide a rationale for the latter practice.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Austen-Smith, D., and J.S. Banks (1996), Information Aggregation, Rationality, and the Condorcet Jury Theorem, American Political Science Review, 90(1), 34–45
Brainard, W.C. (1967), Uncertainty and the Effectiveness of Policy, The American Economic Review, 57(2), 411–425
Christodoulakis. N, and F. van der Ploeg (1987), Macro-Dynamic Policy Formulation with Conflicting Views of the Economy: A Synthesis of Optimal Control and Feedback Design, International Journal of Systems Science, 18(2), 449–476
Cukierman, A., and Y. Spiegel (1998), When Do Representative and Direct Democracies Lead to Similar Policy Choices?, Center Discussion Paper No. 98115, Tilburg: Tilburg University
Downs, A. (1957), An Economic Theory of Democracy, New York: Harper & Row
Fiorina, M.P. (1997), Voting Behavior, in D.C. Mueller (Ed.), Perspectives on Public Choice: A Handbook, Cambridge (U.K.) et cetera: Cambridge University Press, 391–414
Harrington, J.E. (1993), Economic Policy, Economic Performance, and Elections, The American Economic Review, 83(1), 27–42
Harris, S.E. (1962), The Economics of the Political Parties, New York: MacMillan
Ladha, K.K. (1992), The Condorcet Jury Theorem, Free Speech, and Correlated Votes, American Journal of Political Science, 36(3), 617–634
Letterie, W., and O.H. Swank (1998), Economic Policy, Model Uncertainty and Elections, Economics and Politics, 10(1), 85–103
Piketty, T. (1999), The Information-Aggregation Approach to Political Institutions, European Economic Review, 43(4–6), 791–800
Roemer, J.E. (1994), The Strategic Role of Party Ideology When Voters are Uncertain About How the Economy Works, American Political Science Review, 88(2), 327–335
Schultz, C. (1995), The Politics of Persuasion When Voters Are Rational, Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 97(3), 357–368
Swank, O.H. (1994), Partisan Views on the Economy, Public Choice, 81(1–2), 137–150
Swank, O.H., and B. Visser (2002), Delegation or Voting, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper TI 2002–005/1, Amsterdam et cetera: Tinbergen Institute
Tobin, J. (1974), The New Economics One Decade Older, Princeton: Princeton University Press
Tufte, E.R. (1978), Political Control of the Economy, Princeton: Princeton University Press
Wilson, J.Q. (1989), Bureaucracy, New York: Basic Books
Young, H.P. (1988), Condorcet’s Theory of Voting, American Political Science Review, 82(4), 1231–1244
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2003 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Swank, O.H. (2003). A Rationale for Assessments of Election Programmes. In: Graafland, J.J., Ros, A.P. (eds) Economic Assessment of Election Programmes. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0290-6_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0290-6_8
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-5006-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-0290-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive