Transport of Spermatozoa in the Female Genital Tract
Millions of spermatozoa are inseminated into the mammalian female genital tract in order to fertilize only one or a few oocytes. The movement of spermatozoa through the female genital tract is actually regulated by the female so that a few reach the oocyte in the oviduct (fallopian tube) and only one of them succeeds in fertilizing it. This is accomplished by placing filters and traps in the path of the spermatozoa and by switching the way in which the tails of the spermatozoa beat. In this chapter, the way in which movement of spermatozoa into and through each female reproductive organ is regulated will be discussed.
KeywordsSugar Carbohydrate Estrogen Heparin Oligomer
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Croxatto H.B. Gamete Transport. In Reproductive Endocrinology, Surgery, and Technology, E.Y. Adashi, J.A. Rock, Z. Rosenwaks, eds. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven Publishers, 1996, 385–402Google Scholar
- 4.Bedford J. M., Yanagimachi R. Initiation of sperm motility after mating in the rat. J. Androl l992; 13:444–449Google Scholar
- 5.Roberts S.J. Infertility in male animals (andrology). In Veterinary Obstetrics and Genital Diseases (Theriogenology), S.J. Roberts, ed. North Pomfret Vt: David and Charles, Inc. 1986Google Scholar
- 9.Harper M. J. K. Gamete and zygote transport. In The Physiology of Reproduction, E. Knobil, J. D. Neill, eds. New York: Raven Press, Ltd, 1994,123–187.Google Scholar
- 24.Lefebvre R., DeMott R.P., Suarez S.S., Samper J.C. Specific inhibition of equine sperm binding to oviductal epithelium. Equine Reproduction VI, Biol Reprod Mono 1995; 1: 689–696Google Scholar
- 31.Manjunath P., Chandonnet L., LeBlond E., Desnoyers L. Major proteins of bovine seminal vesicles bind to spermatozoa. Biol Reprod 1993; 49:27–37Google Scholar
- 35.Pacey A.A., Hill C.J., Scudamore I.W., Warren M.A., Barratt C.L.R., Cooke I.D. The interaction in vitro of human spermatozoa with epithelial cells from the human uterine (Fallopian) tube. Human Reprod 1995; 10:360–366Google Scholar