Skip to main content
  • 25 Accesses

Abstract

Are young children “naturally” creative? Can the creative episode in young children be compared to the process by which the major creators in a society produce their works? The answers to these questions suggest possibilities for how parents and teachers might promote creativity in young children.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ainsworth, M.D.S. (1973). The development of infant-mother attachment. In B.M. Caldwell & H.N. Ricciuti (Eds.), Review of child development research (Vol. 3, pp. 1–94). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amabile, T.M. (2001). Beyond talent: John Irving and the passionate craft of creativity. American Psychologist, 56(4), 333–336.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Benjamin, J. (1988). The bonds of love. New York: Pantheon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berliner, P. (1997). Give and take: The collective conversation of jazz performance. In R.K. Sawyer (Ed.), Creativity in performance (pp. 9–41). Greenwich, CT: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boden, M.A. (1996). Computer models of creativity. In R.J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 251–273). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York: HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dansky, J. (1980) Make-believe: A mediator of the relationship between play and associative fluency. Child Development, 51, 576–579.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, C. (1976). The creative process: A study in paradox. In C. Winsor (Ed.), The creative process. New York: Bank Street College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, C. (1989, August). Young children as authors: The creative process in first stories. Paper Presented at the American Psychological Association Meetings in New Orleans.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, C. (1998). The writer tells: The creative process in the writing of literary fiction. Creativity Research Journal, 11(1), 29–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, C. (2001). “I’m too busy”: The creative paradox and the young child. In M. Bloom & T.P. Gullotta (Eds.), Promoting creativity across the lifespan (pp. 45–82). New London, CT: CWLA Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyson, A.H., & Genishi, C. (1994). Introduction: The need for story. In A.H. Dyson & C. Genishi (Eds.), The need for story (pp. 1–7). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engel, S. (1995). The stories children tell. New York: W.H. Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feitelstein, D., & Ross, G. (1973). The neglected factor-play. Human Development, 16, 202–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, M.B. (1983) Play as the creation of imaginary situations: The role of language. In S. Wapner & B. Kaplan (Eds.), Toward a holistic developmental psychology. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, M. (1989). A convergence of streams: Dramatic change in the artistic work of Melissa Zink. In D.B. Wallace and H.E. Gruber (Eds.), Creative people at work (pp. 255–277). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, M. (1994). Art, play, and symbolization in childhood and beyond: Reconsidering connections. Teacher’s College Record, 95(4), 526–541.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (1959). Collected papers. (J. Riviere Trans.). London: Hogarth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garvey, C. (1990) Play. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H. (1993). Creating minds. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruber, H.E. (1981). Darwin on man: A psychological study of scientific creativity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guilford, J.P. (1959). The three faces of intellect. American Psychologist, 14, 469–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gwathmey, E., & Mott, A. (2000). Visualizing experience. In N. Nager & E.K. Shapiro (Eds.), Revisiting a progressive pedagogy: The developmental interaction approach (pp. 139–160). Albany, NY: SUNY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, M. (1987). The relationship between symbolic and manipulative (object) play. In D. Gorelitz & J. Wohwill (Eds.), Curiosity, imagination, and play (pp. 247–257). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahler, M.S., Pine, F., & Bergman, A. (1975). The psychological birth of the human infant: Symbiosis and individuation, New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nager, N., & Shapiro, E.K (Eds.). (2000). Revisiting a progressive pedagogy: The developmental interaction approach. Albany, NY: SUNY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pelligrini, A. (1992). Rough and tumble play and social problem solving flexibility. Creativity Research Journal, 5, 13–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rejskind, F.G.(1982). Autonomy and creativity in children. Journal of Creative Behavior, 16(1), 58–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, C. (1959). A theory of therapy, personality, and interpersonal relationships, as developed in the client-centered framework. In S. Koch (Ed.), Psychology: A study of a science (Vol. 3, pp. 184–256). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russ, S.W. (1996). Development of creative processes in children. In M. Runco (Ed.), Creativity from childhood through adulthood: The developmental issues. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schachtel, E.G. (1959). Metamorphosis. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sessions, R. (1952). The composer and his message. In B. Ghiseln (Ed.), The creative process (pp. 45–49). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, N.R. (1993) Experience and art: Teaching children to paint (2nd ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinbeck, J. (1989) Working days: The journals of the grapes of wrath. R. DeMott. Ed.. New York: Viking.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torrance, E.P. (1988). The nature of creativity as manifest in its testing. In R.J. Sternberg (Ed.). The nature of creativity: Contemporary psychological perspectives (pp. 43–75). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vandenberg, B. (1988) The realities of play. In D. Morrison (Ed.), Organizing early experience: Imagination and cognition in childhood. Amityville, NY: Baywood.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallach, M.A., & Kogan, N. (1965) Modes of thinking in young children: A study of the creativity-intelligence distinction. New York: Holt, Rinehart, Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells, C.G. (1986) The meaning makers: Children learning language and using language to learn. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winner, E. (1996). Gifted children: Myths and realities. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Thomas P. Gullotta Martin Bloom Jonathan Kotch Craig Blakely Lynne Bond Gerald Adams Colette Browne Waldo Klein Jessica Ramos

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Doyle, C. (2003). Creativity, Early Childhood. In: Gullotta, T.P., et al. Encyclopedia of Primary Prevention and Health Promotion. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0195-4_47

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0195-4_47

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-4961-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-0195-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics