Advertisement

Origin and Early Evolution of Predators

The Ecotone Model and Early Evidence for Macropredation
  • Mark A. S. Mcmenamin
Chapter
Part of the Topics in Geobiology book series (TGBI, volume 20)

Abstract

Our current knowledge on the origin and early evolution of large predators is summarized by Simon Conway Morris (1999, 153–154) as follows:

...for many years it was claimed that Cambrian marine communities were almost entirely free of predators… the seas were [thought to be] full of suspension-feeders gently swaying in the sea water and deposit feeders calmly digging their way through the sediment. This view is now seen to be far too idyllic, but the story of the rise of predators is still quite tentative. It does appear, however, that in contrast to Cambrian communities those of the Ediacaran were largely free of predators.

Keywords

Lower Cambrian Trace Fossil Message Delivery Large Predator Prey Organism 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alexander, R. R., 1987, Intraspecific selective survival within variably uniplicate Late Devonian brachiopods, Lethaia 20:315–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alpert, S., 1976, Trilobite and star-like trace fossils from the White-Inyo Mountains, California, J. Paleontol. 49:661–669.Google Scholar
  3. Alpert, S., and Moore, J. N., 1975, Lower Cambrian trace fossil evidence for predation on trilobites, Lethaia 8:223–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Alroy, J., 2001, A multispecies overkill simulation of the end Pleistocene megafaunal mass extinction, Science 292:1893–1896.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Anderson, A., 1989, Mechanics of overkill in the extinction of New Zealand moas, J. Archaeol. Sci. 16:137–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bambach, R. K., and Kowalewski, M., 1999, Diversity of predators compared to the records of prey-predator escalation—two tales of the history of predation, Geol. Soc. Am. Abstr. Progr. 31:336.Google Scholar
  7. Bengtson, S., 1994, The advent of animal skeletons, in: Early Life on Earth (S. Bengtson, ed.), Columbia University Press, New York, pp. 412–425.Google Scholar
  8. Bengtson, S., and Yue Zhao, 1992, Predatorial borings in Late Precambrian mineralized exoskeletons, Science 257:367–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bergson, H., 1908, L’Evolution créatrice, Librairies Félix Alcan et Guillaumin Réunies, Paris.Google Scholar
  10. Birkenmajer, K., 1977, Trace fossil evidence for predation on trilobites from Lower Cambrian of South Spitsbergen, Norsk Polarinstitut Arsbok 1976:187–195.Google Scholar
  11. Blake, D. B., and Guensburg, T. E., 1992, Caught in the act; a Late Ordovician asteroid and its pelecypod prey, Geol. Soc. Am. Abstr. Progr. 24:6.Google Scholar
  12. Bond, A. B., and Kamil, A. C., 2002, Visual predators select for crypticity and polymorphism in virtual prey, Nature 415:609–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bownng, S. A., Grotzinger, J. P., Isachsen, C. E., Knoll, A. H., Pelechaty, S. M., and Kolosov, P., 1993, Calibrating rates of Early Cambrian evolution, Science 261:1293–1298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Brasier, M., Green, O., and Shields, G., 1997, Ediacaran sponge spicule clusters from southwestern Mongolia and the origins of the Cambrian fauna, Geology 25:303–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Briggs, D. E. G., 1994, Giant predators from the Cambrian, Science 264:1283–1284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Briggs, D. E. G, and Whittington, H. B, 1985, Terror of the trilobites. Nat. Hist. 94:34–39.Google Scholar
  17. Burzin, M., 1999, A mysterious world of Ediacaran organisms, Science in Russia 2:22–28.Google Scholar
  18. Burzin, M. B., and Gnilovskaya, M. B., 1999, Kakimi byli drevneishie zhibotnye, Priroda 11:31–41.Google Scholar
  19. Chen J., Ramsköld, L., and Gui-Qing, Z., 1994, Evidence for monophyly and arthropod affinity of Cambrian giant predators, Science 264:1304–1308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Collins, D., 1996, The “evolution” of Anomalocaris and its classification in the arthropod class Dinocarida (nov.) and order Radiodonta (nov.), J. Paleontol. 70:280–293.Google Scholar
  21. Conway Morris, S., 1985, Cambrian enigma, Nature 316:677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Conway Morris, S., 1999, The Crucible of Creation, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  23. Conway Morris, S., and Bengtson, S., 1994, Cambrian predators; possible evidence from boreholes, J. Paleontol. 68:1–23.Google Scholar
  24. Conway Morris, S., and Jenkins, R. J. F., 1985, Healed injuries in Early Cambrian trilobites from South Australia, Alcheringa 9:167–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Culver, S. J., 1991, Early Cambrian foraminifera from West Africa, Science 254:689–691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Debrenne, F., and Zhuravlev, A. Yu., 1997, Cambrian food web: A brief review, Geobios 20:181–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Droser, M. L., Jensen, S., and Gehling, J. G., 1998, The first grave robbers: Early Cambrian ichnofabric, Geol. Soc. Am. Abstr. Progr. 30:233.Google Scholar
  28. Eisner, T., Eisner, M., and Deyrup, M., 1996, Millipede defense: use of detachable bristles to entangle ants, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 93:10848–10851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Evans, J. W., 1910, The sudden appearance of the Cambrian fauna, 11th Inter. Geol. Congr., Stockholm, 1910, Compte Rendu 1:543–546.Google Scholar
  30. Fortin, M.-J., 1994, Edge detection algorithms for two-dimensional ecological data, Ecology 75:956–965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gaudry, A., 1883, Les Enchainements du Monde Animal Dans Les Temps Geologiques, Fossiles primaires, Libraire F. Savy, Paris.Google Scholar
  32. Hallam, A., 1992, Great Geological Controversies, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  33. Hawksworth, D. L., 1994, Strategies for living together, Nature 371:570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Horny, R. J., 1997, Shell breakage and repair in Sinuitopsis neglecta (Mollusca, Tergomya) from the Middle Ordovician of Bohemia, Casopis Narodniho Muzea v Praze. Rada Prirodovedna 166:137–142.Google Scholar
  35. Jensen, S., 1990, Predation by early Cambrian trilobites on infaunal worms—evidence from the Swedish Mickwitzia Sandstone, Lethaia 23:29–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Jensen, S., Gehling, J. G., and Droser, M. L., 1998, Ediacara-type fossils in Cambrian sediments, Nature 393:567–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kelly-Borges, M., 1995, Sponges out of their depth, Nature 373:284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Khakhina, L. N., 1992, Concepts of Symbiogenesis, Yale University Press, New Haven.Google Scholar
  39. Landing, E., Bowring, S. A., Davidek, K. L., Westrop, S. R., Geyer, G., and Heldmaier, W., 1998, Duration of the Early Cambrian: U-Pb ages of volcanic ashes from Avalon and Gondwana, Can. J. Earth Sci. 35:329–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Leighton, L. R., 1999, Antipredatory function of brachiopod ornament, Geol. Soc. Am. Abstr. Progr. 31:43.Google Scholar
  41. Leighton, L. R., 2001, New example of Devonian predatory boreholes and the influence of brachiopod spines on predator success, Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclim. Palaeoecol. 165:53–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lescinsky, H. L., and Benninger, L., 1994, Pseudo-borings and predator traces; artifacts of pressure-dissolution in fossiliferous shales, Palaios 9:599–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Margulis, L., and Sagan, D., 2000, What is Life?, University of California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar
  44. Martin, P. S., 1967, Pleistocene overkill, Nat. Hist. 76:32–38.Google Scholar
  45. May, R. M., 1976, Simple mathematical models with very complicated dynamics, Nature 261:459–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. McCarty, G., 1976, Calculator calculus, Page-Finklin Publishing Company, Palo Alto, California.Google Scholar
  47. McIlroy, D., and Szaniawski, H., 2000, A Lower Cambrian protoconodont apparatus from the Placentian of southeastern Newfoundland, Lethaia 33:95–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. McMenamin, M. A. S., 1986, The Garden of Ediacara, Palaios 1:178–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. McMenamin, M. A. S., 1987, The fate of the Ediacaran fauna, the nature of conulariids, and the basal Paleozoic predator revolution, Geol. Soc. Am. Abstr. Progr. 19:29.Google Scholar
  50. McMenamin, M. A. S., 1988, Paleoecological feedback and the Vendian-Cambrian transition, Trends Ecol. Evol. 3:205–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. McMenamin, M. A. S., 1992a., The Cambrian transition as a time-transgressive ecotone, Geol. Soc. Am. Abstr. Progr. 24:62.Google Scholar
  52. McMenamin, M. A. S., 1992b, Two new species of the Cambrian genus Mickwitzia, J. Paleontol. 66:173–182.Google Scholar
  53. McMenamin, M. A. S., 1993, Osmotrophy in fossil protoctists and early animals, Invert. Reprod. Develop. 22:301–304.Google Scholar
  54. McMenamin, M. A. S., 1996, Ediacaran biota from Sonora, Mexico, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 93:4990–4993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. McMenamin, M. A. S., 1998, The Garden of Ediacara, Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  56. McMenamin, M. A. S., ed., 2001, Paleontology Sonora: Lipalian and Cambrian, Meanma Press, South Hadley, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  57. McMenamin, M. A. S., and McMenamin, D. L. S., 1990, The Emergence of Animals, Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  58. McMenamin, M. A. S., and Whiteside, J. H., 1999, Hypermarine upwelling and a new Vernadskian metric, J. Biosph. Sci. 1,http://www.mtholyoke.edu
  59. Moody, K. E., 2001, Patterns of Predation on juvenile blue crabs in lower Chesapeake Bay: size, habitat and seasonality, in: Proceedings of the Blue Crab Mortality Symposium (V. Guillory, H. Perry, and S. Vanderkooy, eds.), Gulf States Mar. Fish. Commis. Pub. No. 90, Ocean Springs, Mississippi, pp. 84–92.Google Scholar
  60. Moody, K. E., and Steneck, R. S., 1993, Mechanisms of predation among large decapod crustaceans of the Gulf of Maine Coast: functional vs. phylogenetic patterns, J. Exper. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 168:111–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Nedin, C., 1999, Anomalocaris predation on nonmineralized and mineralized trilobites, Geology 27:987–990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Nesis, K. N., 1995, Khishchniki na zare zhizni, Priroda 8:60–62Google Scholar
  63. O’Shea, D., 1980, An Exposition of Catastrophe Theory and its Applications to Phase Transitions, Queen’s Papers in Pure and Applied Mathematics Number 47, Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario.Google Scholar
  64. O’Shea, D., 1986, Elementary catastrophes, phase transitions and singularities, Math. Model. 7:397–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Pickerill, R. K., and Blissett, D., 1999, A predatory Rusophycus burrow from the Cambrian of southern New Brunswick, eastern Canada, Atlantic Geol. 35:179–183.Google Scholar
  66. Schlichter, D., and Fricke, H. W., 1991, Mechanisms of amplification of photosynthetically active radiation in the symbiotic deep-water coral Leptoseris fragilis, Hydrobiologia 216/217:389–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Sebens, K. P., and Koehl, M. A. R., 1984, Predation on zooplankton by the benthic anthozoans Alcyonium siderium (Alcyonacea) and Metridium senile (Actiniaria) in the New England subtidal, Mar. Biol. 81:255–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Sepkoski, J. J., 1992, Proterozoic-Early Cambrian diversification of metazoans and metaphytes, in: The Proterozoic Biosphere (J. W. Schopf and C. Klein, eds.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 553–561.Google Scholar
  69. Stanley, S. M., 1973, An ecological theory for the sudden origin of multicellular life in the late Precambrian, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 70:1486–1489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Vacelet, J., and Boury-Esnault, N., 1995, Carnivorous sponges, Nature 373:333–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Valentine, J. W., 1994, The Cambrian explosion, in: Early Life on Earth (S. Bengtson, ed.), Columbia University Press, New York, pp. 401–411.Google Scholar
  72. Verhulst, P. F., 1838, Notice sur la loi que la population suit dans son accroissement, Coresp. Math. Phys. 10:113–121.Google Scholar
  73. Vermeij, G. J., 1987, Evolution and Escalation: An Ecological History of Life, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.Google Scholar
  74. Vernadsky, V. I., 1998, The Biosphere, Springer-Verlag, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Vorwald, G. R., 1982, Healed injuries in trilobites; evidence for a large Cambrian predator, Geol. Soc. Am. Abstr. Progr. 14:639.Google Scholar
  76. Waggoner, B. M., 2000, Rewriting the rulebook; community ecology through the Neoproterozoic-Cambrian transition, Geol. Soc. Am. Abstr. Progr. 32:41.Google Scholar
  77. Walker, T. D., 1985, Diversification functions and the rate of taxonomic evolution, in: Phanerozoic Diversity Patterns (J. W. Valentine, ed.), Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, pp. 311–334.Google Scholar
  78. Whittington, H. B., 1985, The Burgess Shale, Yale University Press, New Haven.Google Scholar
  79. Whittington, H. B., and Briggs, D. E. G., 1985, The largest Cambrian animal, Anomalocaris, Burgess Shale, British Columbia, Trans. R. Soc. London, Series B, Biol. Sci. 309:569–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mark A. S. Mcmenamin
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Earth and EnvironmentMount Holyoke CollegeSouth HadleyUSA

Personalised recommendations