Skip to main content

Nonverbal Assessment of Personality and Psychopathology

  • Chapter
Handbook of Nonverbal Assessment

Abstract

The appraisal of personality and psychopathology through nonverbal methodologies is distinguished by its widespread practice among psychologists, in spite of a dearth of empirically supported tests and procedures. As part of the assessment process, the vast majority of professionals use projective drawings (e.g., Camara, Nathan, & Puente, 2000) and implicitly observe nonverbal behaviors during interviews and test sessions (e.g., facial expressions, motor behaviors, and problem-solving approaches). At the same time, these approaches are often interpreted informally and unsystematically and relegated to a secondary status behind norm-referenced self-report and other-report procedures in arriving at diagnostic and treatment-related inferences. In this chapter, some historical perspectives are recounted and a framework offered for thinking about nonverbal tests within the domain of personality and psychopathology assessment. Several approaches to nonverbal assessment of personality are reviewed, including some traditional and enduring techniques as well as some newer pioneering efforts. Finally, areas of promising research are described that may suggest a new era in the use of nonverbal personality assessment procedures to augment language-based measures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aitken, R. C. B. (1969). Measurement of feelings using visual analogue scales. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine, 62,989–993.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Aoki, S. (1981). The retest reliability of the Sand Play Technique: II. British Journal of Projective Psychology & Personality Study, 26,25–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arruda, J. E., Stern, R. A., & Legendre, S. A. (1996). Assessment of mood state in patients undergoing electroconvulsive therapy: The utility of Visual Analog Mood Scales developed for cognitively impaired patients. Convulsive Therapy, 12, 207–212.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, A. T., & Steer, R. A. (1987). Beck depression inventory manual. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, A. T., Steer, R. A. & Brown, G. K. (1996). Beck depression inventory manual (2nd ed.). San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, J. E. (1948). Projective techniques: A dynamic approach to the study of the personality. New York: Longmans, Green.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bender, L. (1938). A visual motor gestalt test and its clinical use. Research monograph No. 3. New York: American Orthopsychiatric Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernreuter, R. G. (1931). Bernreuter personality inventory. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, E. M., & Putnam, F. W. (1986). Development, reliability, and validity of a dissociation scale. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 174,727–735.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Briccetti, K. A. (1994). Emotional indicators of deaf children on the Draw-a-Person test. American Annals of the Deaf, 139,500–505.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Buck, J. N. (1948). The H-T-P technique: A qualitative and quantitative scoring manual. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 4, 317–396.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Buck, J. N., & Warren, W. L. (1992). House-Tree-Person projective drawing technique (H-T-P):Manual and interpretive guide. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, P. D. (1978). The Bender Gestalt Test: A review of reported research with school-age subjects, 1966–1977. Psychology in the Schools, 15, 327–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buhler, C. (1951a). The World Test: A projective technique. Journal of Child Psychiatry, 2, 4–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buhler, C. (1951b). The World Test: Manual of directions. Journal of Child Psychiatry, 2, 69–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buhler, C., & Kelly, G. (1941). The World Test. A measurement of emotional disturbance. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns, R. C. (1987). Kinetic-House-Tree-Person drawings (K-H-T-P): An interpretive manual. New York: Brunner/Mazel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns, R. C., & Kaufman, S. H. (1970). Kinetic family drawings (K-F-D): An introduction to understanding children through kinetic drawings. New York: Brunner/Mazel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns, R. C., & Kaufman, S. H. (1972). Actions, styles, and symbols in kinetic family draw-ings (K-F-D): An interpretive manual. New York: Brunner/Mazel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butcher, J. N., Dahlstrom, W. G., Graham, J. R., Tellegen, A., & Kaemmer, B. (1989). Minnesota multiphasic personality inventory-2 (MMPI-2): Manual for administration and scoring. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camara, W. J., Nathan, J. S., & Puente, A. E. (2000).Psychological test usage: Implicationsin professional psychology.Professional psychology: Research & practice,31,141–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, B. M., Hammer, J. S., & Singer, S. (1988). The Diagnostic Drawing Series: A systematic approach to art therapy evaluation and research. Arts in Psychotherapy, 15,11–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummings, J. A. (1986). Projective drawings. In H. M. Knoff (Ed.), The assessment of child and adolescent personality (pp. 199–244). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derogatis, L. R. (1987). The Derogatis Stress Profile (DSP): Quantification of psychological stress. Advances in Psychosomatic Medicine,17, 30–54.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, J. L. (1998). Concurrent validity of the Koppitz Bender-Gestalt Emotional Indicatorsamong women with mental retardation. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 86, 195–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dumont, F., & Smith, D. (1996). Projectives and their infirm research base. Professional psychology: Research and practice, 27, 419–421.

    Google Scholar 

  • Exner, J. E. (1993). The rorschach: A comprehensive system. Volume 1: Basic foundations (3rd ed.). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eysenck, H. J. (1990). The decline and fall of the freudian empire. Washington, DC: Scott-Townsend.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fagan, T., & Wilson, P. (1997). Karen Machover (1902–1996): Obituary. American Psychologist, 52,742.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, L. K. (1939). Projective methods for the study of personality. Journal of Psychology. 8,389–413.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, L. K. (1948). Projective methods. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freyd, M. (1923). The graphic rating scale. Journal of Educational Psychology, 14, 83–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, G. G., Preuss, M., & Hawkins, W. F. (1970). The validity of the human figure drawings with disturbed and normal children. Journal of School Psychology, 8.54–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gehring, T. M. (1998). The Family System Test (FAST). Seattle WA: Hogrefe & Huber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gehring, T. M., & Page, J. (2000). Family System Test (FAST): A systemic approach forfamily evaluation in clinical practice and research. In K. Gitlin-Weiner, A. Sandgrund, &C. Schaefer (Eds.), Play diagnosis and assessment (2nd ed., pp. 419–445). New York:Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gitlin-Weiner, K., Sandgrund, A., & Schaefer, C. (Eds.). (2000). Play diagnosis and assessment (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goff, A. F., & Parker, A. W. (1969). Reliability of the Koppitz scoring system for the Bender Gestalt Test. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 25, 407–409.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, L. R. (1993). The structure of phenotypic personality traits. American Psychologist. 48,26–34.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goodenough, F. L. (1926). Measurement of intelligence by drawings. New York: World Book Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gulbro-Leavitt, C., & Schimmel, B. (1991). Assessing depression in children and adolescents using the Diagnostic Drawing Series modified for children (DDS-C). Arts in Psychotherapy, 18,353–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurycka, A. (Ed.). (1996). The representation of the world in the human mind: Typology and functions. Poznan: University of Poznan Press, Humaniora.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammer, E. F. (1958). The clinical application of projective drawings. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammer, E. F. (1986). Graphic techniques with children and adolescents. In A. I. Rabin (Ed.), Projective techniques for adolescents and children (pp. 239–263). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Handler, L., & Habenicht, D. (1994). The Kinetic Family Drawing Technique: A review of the literature. Journal of Personality Assessment, 62, 440–464.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanes, M. (1997). Utilizing the circus phenomenon as a drawing theme in art therapy. Arts in Psychotherapy, 24, 375–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, D. B. (1963). Children’s drawings as measures of intellectual maturity. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrower, M. R. (1950). The Most Unpleasant Concept Test; a graphic projective technique. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 3, 213–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartshorne, H., & May, M. (1928). Tests of honesty and trustworthiness. New York: Association Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hays, R. E., & Lyons, S. J. (1981). The bridge drawing: A projective technique for assessment in art therapy. Arts in Psychotherapy, 8, 207–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holt, R. R. (1992). The contemporary crises of psychoanalysis. Psychoanalysis & Contemporary Thought, 15,375–403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Homberger, E. [Erikson, E. H.) (1938). Dramatic productions test. In H. A. Murray (Ed.), Explorations in personality: A clinical and experimental study of fifty men of college age (pp. 552–582). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hulse, W. (1951). The emotionally disturbed child draws his family. Quarterly Journal of Child Behavior, 3, 152–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutt, M. L. (1985). The Hutt adaptation of the Bender-Gestalt Test (4th ed.). New York: Grune & Stratton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, D. N. (1971). A sequential system for personality scale development. In C. D. Spielberger (Ed.), Current topics in clinical and community psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 61–92). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, D. N. (1984). Personality research form manual. Port Huron, MI: Research Psychologists.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahill, S. (1984). Human figure drawing in adults: An update of the empirical evidence, 1967–1982. Canadian Psychology, 25, 269–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, R. G. (1986). Questioning the clinical usefulness of projective psychological tests for children. Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 7, 378–382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klepsch, M., & Logie, L. (1982). Children draw and tell. New York: Brunner/Mazel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knoff, H., & Prout, H. (1985). The Kinetic Family Drawing System: A review and integration of the Kinetic Family and School Drawing techniques. Psychology in the Schools, 22, 50–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knoff, H. M. (1993). The utility of human figure drawings in personality and intellectual assessment: Why ask why? School Psychology Quarterly, 8, 191–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koppitz, E. M. (1963). The Bender Gestalt Test for young children. New York: Grune & Stratton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koppitz, E. M. (1968). Psychological evaluation of children’s human figure drawings. New York: Grune & Stratton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koppitz, E. M. (1975). The Bender Gestalt Test for young children (vol. II): Research and application. New York: Grune & Stratton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koppitz, E. M. (1984). Psychological evaluation of human figure drawings by middle school pupils. New York: Grupe & Stratton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacks, P. (1999). Bender Gestalt screening for brain dysfunction (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S., & Oh, S. (1998). Visuoperceptual and constructive ability disturbances of patients with traumatic brain injury in Hutt Adaptation of the Bender Gestalt Test. Korean Jour-nal of Clinical Psychology, 17,311–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, E. A. (1972). The projective use of the Bender Gestalt. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levick, M. F. (2000) The Levick Emotional and Cognitive Art Therapy Assessment (LECATA; rev. ed.). Boca Raton, FL: South Florida Art Psychotherapy Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindzey, G. (1961). Projective techniques and cross-cultural research. New York: AppletonCentury-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowenfeld, M. (1939) The world pictures of children; A method of recording and studying them (Paper read on March 23rd, 1938 to the Medical Section of the British Psychological Society). British Journal of Medical Psychology, 18, 65–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowenfeld, M. (1979). The world technique. London: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Machover, K. (1949). Personality projection in the drawing of the human figure (A method of personality investigation). Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, R. P. (1983). The ethical issues in the use and interpretation of the Draw-a-Person Test and other similar projective procedures. School Psychologist, 38, 6–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matavich, M. A. (1999). Discriminant validity of the Draw-a-Person Screening Procedure for Emotional Disturbance for incarcerated juvenile delinquents in special education.Dissertation Abstracts International, 59, 3736.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matto, H. C. (2001). Investigating the clinical utility of the Draw-a-Person: Screening Procedure for Emotional Disturbance (DAP:SPED) projective test in assessment of high-risk youth. A measurement validation study. Dissertation Abstracts International, 61(2), 2920.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNair, D. M., Lorr, M., & Droppleman, L. F. (1981). Profile of mood states. San Diego, CA: Educational and Industrial Testing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNeish, T. J., & Naglieri, J. A. (1993). Identification of individuals with serious emotional disturbance using the Draw A Person: Screening Procedure for Emotional Disturbance. Journal of Special Education, 27,115–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michael, J. C., & Buhler, C. (1945). Experiences with personality testing in the neuropsychiatric department of a general hospital. Diseases of the Nervous System, 6, 205–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minuchin, S. (1974). Families & family therapy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, C. D., & Murray, H. A. (1935). A method for investigating phantasies: The Thematic Apperception Test. Archives of Neurology and Psychiatry, 34, 289–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Motta, R. W., Little, S. G., & Tobin, M. I. (1993a). A picture is worth less than a thousand words: Response to reviewers. School Psychology Quarterly, 8, 197–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Motta, R. W., Little, S. G., & Tobin, M. I. (1993b). The use and abuse of human figure drawings. School Psychology Quarterly, 8, 162–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, H. A. (1938). Explorations in personality. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naglieri, J. A. (1988). Draw a person: A quantitative scoring system. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naglieri, J. A., McNeish, T. J., & Bardos, A. N. (1991). Draw a Person: Screening procedure for Emotional Disturbance (DAP: SPED). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naglieri, J. A., & Pfeiffer, S. I. (1992). Performance of disruptive behavior disordered and normal samples on the Draw A Person: Screening Procedure for Emotional Disturbance. Psychological Assessment, 4, 156–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nyenhuis, D. L., Stern, R. A., Yamamoto, C., Luchetta, T., & Arruda, J. E. (1997). Standardization and validation of the Visual Analog Mood Scales. The Clinical Neuropsychologist,11, 407–415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, R. A., & Kronenberger, E. J. (1971). Testing the applicability of Koppitz’s Bender-Gestalt scores to brain-damaged, emotionally disturbed and normal adolescents. Psychology in the Schools, 8, 250–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascal, G. R., & Suttell, B. J. (1951). The bender gestalt test. New York: Grune & Stratton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paunonen, S. V., & Ashton, M. C. (in press). The nonverbal assessment of personality: The NPQ and the FF-NPQ. In B. de Raad & M. Perugini (Eds.), Big five assessment. Goettingen, Germany: Hogrefe & Huber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paunonen, S. V., Ashton, M. C., & Jackson, D. N. (2001). Nonverbal assessment of the big five personality factors. European Journal of Personality, 15, 3–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paunonen, S. V., & Jackson, D. N. (1998). Nonverbal Personality Questionnaire (NPQ). Port Huron, MI: Sigma Assessment Systems.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paunonen, S. V., Jackson, D. N., & Keinonen, M. (1990). The structured nonverbal assessment of personality. Journal of Personality, 58, 481–502.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Paunonen, S. V., Jackson, D. N., Trzebinski, J., & Forsterling, F. (1992). Personality structure across cultures: A multimethod evaluation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62,447–456.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paunonen, S. V., Keinonen, M., Trzebinski, J., Forsterling, F., Grishenko-Roze, N., Kouznetsova, L. et al. (1996). The structure of personality in six cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 27, 339–353.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paunonen, S. V., Zeidner, M., Engvik, H. A., Oosterveld, P., & Maliphant, R. (2000). The nonverbal assessment of personality in five cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology,31, 220–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prout, H. T., & Phillips, P. D. (1974). A clinical note: The Kinetic School Drawing. Psychology in the Schools, 11,303–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichenberg, N., & Raphael, A. J. (1992). Advanced psychodiagnostic interpretation of the Bender Gestalt Test: Adults and children. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Remington, M., Tyrer, P. J., Newson-Smith, J., & Cicchetti, D. V. (1979). Comparative reliability of categorical and analog rating scales in the assessment of psychiatric symptomatology. Psychological Medicine, 9, 765–770.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, C. R. (1978). A quick-scoring guide to the interpretation of children’s Kinetic Family Drawings (KFD). Psychology in the Schools, 15, 489–492.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roback, H. B. (1968). Human figure drawings: Their utility in the clinical psychologist’s armamentarium for personality assessment. Psychological Bulletin, 70, 1–19.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rorschach, H. (1921). Psychodiagnostik. Bern: Ernst Bircher.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossini, E. D., & Kaspar, J. C. (1987). The validity of the Bender-Gestalt emotional indicators. Journal of Personality Assessment,51, 254–261.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sangster, G., Rogers, B. J., & Searight, H. R. (1993). The validity of Hutt’s Bender-Gestalt scoring system for hostility: Correlation with the Interpersonal Behavior Survey’s aggression scales. Psychology: A Journal of Human Behavior, 30, 22–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W. D. (1919). Personnel system of the U.S. army (Vol. 2). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, T. R. (1972). Measuring intelligence through bicycle drawings. Indian Educational Review, 7, 1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sjolund, M. (1981). Play-diagnosis and therapy in Sweden: The Erica-Method. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 37, 322–325.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sjolund, M. (1993). The erica method: A technique for play therapy and diagnosis: A training guide. Greeley, CO: Carron.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sjolund, M., & Schaefer, C. E. (1994). The Erica Method of sand play diagnosis and assessment. In K. J. O’Connor & C. E. Schaefer (Eds.), Handbook of play therapy,vol. 2: Advances and innovations (pp. 231–252). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D., & Dumont, F. (1995). A cautionary study: Unwarranted interpretations of the Draw-a-Person Test. Professional psychology: Research & practice, 26,298–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spielberger, C. D., Gorsuch, R. L., & Lushene, R. E. (1970). The state-trait an xiety inventory.Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, R. A. (1997). Visual analog mood scales professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, R. A., Arruda, J. E., Hooper, C. R., Wolfner, G. D., & Morey, C. E. (1997). Visual analogue mood scales to measure internal mood state in neurologically impaired patients: Description and initial validity evidence. Aphasiology, 11, 59–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, R. A., Rosenbaum, J., White, R. F., & Morey, C. E. (1991). Clinical validation of a visual analogue dysphoria scale for neurologic patients [Abstract]. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 13,106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swenson, C. H. (1968). Empirical evaluations of human figure drawings: 1957–1966. Psychological Bulletin, 70, 20–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, E. M. (1959). The appraisal of children with cerebral deficits. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tharinger, D. J., & Stark, K. D. (1990). A qualitative versus quantitative approach to evaluating the Draw-a-Person and Kinetic Family Drawing: A study of mood-and anxiety-disorder children. Psychological Assessment, 2, 365–375.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, G. V., & Jolley, R. P. (1998). Drawing conclusions: A re-examination of empirical and conceptual bases for psychological evaluation of children from their drawings. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 37, 127–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urban, W. H. (1963). The Draw-a-Person catalogue for interpretive analysis. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vass, Z. (1999). Projektiv rajzvizsgálat algoritmusokkal (A számítógépes formai elemzés módszerének bemutatása a szkizofrénia képi kifejezodésének tiikrében) [Analysis of projective drawings with algorithms. The method of computer assisted formal analysis, validated in visual expression of schizophrenia]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Budapest: Eötvös Loránd University of Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vass, Z. (2001). Perspectives on objective assessment of projective drawings. Unpublished manuscript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, E. E. (1999). Defining projective techniques: The irrelevancy of “projection.” North American Journal of Psychology,1, 35–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wasserman, C. B. (1995). A study of the Perceptual Adience-Abience scale of the Hutt Adaptation of the Bender-Gestalt test. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities & Social Sciences, 55(12-A), 3752.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wertheimer, M. (1923). Untersuchungen zur Lehre von der Gestalt II. Psycologische Forschung, 4, 301–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodworth, R. S. (1917). Personal data sheet. Chicago: C. H. Stoelting Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wrightson, L., & Saklofske, D. H. (2000). Validity and reliability of the Draw a Person:Screening Procedure for Emotional Disturbance with adolescent students. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 16, 95–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziffer, R. L., & Shapiro, L. E. (1992). Children’s self-report and projective inventory. Bala Cynwyd, PA: Psychological Assessment Service.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wasserman, J.D. (2003). Nonverbal Assessment of Personality and Psychopathology. In: McCallum, R.S. (eds) Handbook of Nonverbal Assessment. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0153-4_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0153-4_14

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-4945-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-0153-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics