Abstract
Much of what transpires in the day-to-day activities of schools and classrooms involves the understanding and expression of ideas transmitted through the medium of spoken and written language. Academic instruction in nearly all content areas is often delivered orally or in a written format, and learners must communicate skills and competencies in the same manner. In order to be academically successful, students must demonstrate the ability to understand concepts through the medium of listening and reading, and must produce acceptable products using verbal and writing skills.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Allen, T. E. (1986). Patterns of academic achievement among hearing impaired students: 1974–1983. In A. N. Shildroth & M. A. Karchmer (Eds.), Deaf children in America(pp. 161–206). San Diego, CA: College-Hill Press.
Alliance for Technology Access (2000). Computer and web resources for people with disabilities: A guide to exploring today’s assistive technology (3rd ed.). Alameda, CA: Hunter House.
American Speech-Language-Hearing Association Position Statement on Non-Speech Communication (1981). Asha, 23, 577–581.
Aroor, S. R. (1992). Assessment of cerebral palsy. Indian Journal of Pediatrics, 59, 159–164.
Barnett, A. J. (1982). Designing an assessment of the child with cerebral palsy. Psychology in the Schools, 19,160–165.
Berninger, V., & Gans, B. M. (1986). Language profiles in nonspeaking individuals of normal intelligence with severe cerebral palsy.Augmentative and Alternative Communication 2,45–50.
Bliss, C. K. (1978). Semantography (Blissymbolics): A simple system of 100 logical pictorial symbols, which can be operated and read like 1 + 2 = 3 in all languages. Sydney: Semantography (Blissymbolics) Publications.
Borowitz, K. C. (2000). Different types of cerebral palsy. Retrieved from http://hscvirginia.edu/cmc/tutorials/cp/type/type.html
Braden, J. P. (1994). Deafness, deprivation, and IQ. New York: Plenum.
Bradley-Johnson, S., & Evans, L. D. (1991) Psychoeducational assessment of hearing-impaired students: Infancy through high school.Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
Brauer, B. A., Braden, J. P., Pollard, R. Q., & Hardy-Braz, S. T. (1998). Deaf and hard of hearing people. In J. S. Sandoval, C. L. Frisby, K. F. Geisinger, J. D. Scheuneman, & J. R. Grenier (Eds.), Test interpretation and diversity: Achieving equity in assessment (pp. 297–316). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Browder, D. M. (2001). Curriculum and assessment for students with moderate and severe disabilities. New York: Guilford Press.
Bullis, M., Reiman, J., Davis, C., & Reid, C. (1997). National field testing of the “Mini” version of the Transition Competence Battery for Adolescents and Young Adults Who are Deaf. Journal of Special Education, 31(3), 347–361.
Bullis, M., Reiman, J., Davis, C., & Thorkildsen, R. (1994). Examination of administration and response formats in the videodisc assessment of deaf adolescents’ transition skills. Exceptional Children, 61,158–173.
Burgemeister, B. B., Blum, L. H., & Lorge, I. (1972). Columbia mental maturity scale (3rd ed.). New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Burns, E. (1998). Test accommodations for students with disabilities. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
Calderon, R., & Low, S. (1998). Early social-emotional, language, and academic development in children with hearing loss: Families with and without fathers. American Annals of the Deaf 143(3),225–234.
Chaleff, C., & Toranzo, N. (2000). Helping our students meet the standards through test preparation classes. American Annals of the Deaf 145(1), 33–40.
Charrow, V., & Fletcher, J. D. (1974). English as a second language of deaf children. Developmental Psychology, 10, 463–470.
DiFrancesca, S. (1972). Academic achievement test results of a national testing program for hearing-impaired students-United States, Spring 1971. Office for Demographic Studies, Gallaudet College.
Frisby, C. (2001). Academic achievement. In L. A. Suzuki, J. G. Ponterotto, & P. J. Meller (Eds.), Handbook of multicultural assessment (2nd ed., pp. 541–568). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Gallaudet Research Institute (1996a). Achievement testing of deaf and hard-of-hearing students: The 9th edition Stanford Achievement Test. Washington, DC: Gallaudet Research Institute.
Gallaudet Research Institute (1996b). Stanford Achievement Test, 9th edition Screening procedures for deaf and hard-of-hearing students. Washington, DC: Gallaudet Research Institute.
Gallaudet Research Institute (1996c). Stanford Achievement Test, 9th edition. Administration procedures for deaf and hard-of-hearing students. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University.
Goossens, C. (1989). Aided communication intervention before assessment: A case study of a child with cerebral palsy. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 5(1), 14–26
Goossens, C., & Crain, S. (1986). Augmentative communication intervention resource. Chicago, IL: Don Johnston Developmental Equipment.
Hammill, D. D., & Larsen, S. C. (1978). Test of Written Language (’YOWL). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
Holt, J. (1994). Classroom attributes and achievement test scores for deaf and hard of hearing students. American Annals of the Deaf. 139(4), 430–437.
Holt, J. A., Traxler, C. B., & Allen, T. E. (1997). Interpreting the scores: A user’s guide to the 9th edition Stanford Achievement Test for educators of deaf and hard-of-hearing students. Washington, DC: Gallaudet Research Institute.
King, T. W. (1999). Assistive technology: Essential human factors. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Koppenhaver, D. A., Evans, D. A., & Yoder, D. E. (1991). Childhood reading and writing expe-riences of literate adults with severe speech and motor impairments. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 7(1), 20–33.
Kretschmer, R. R., & Kretschmer, L. W. (1978). Language development and intervention in the hearing impaired. Baltimore: University Park Press.
Kucherawy, D. A., & Kucherawy, J. M. (1978). Pen and share it. Education and Training of the Mentally Retarded, 13(3), 342–44.
Leybaert, J., Content, A., & Alegria, J. (1987). The development of written word processing The case of deaf children. Workshop presentation, ISPL Congress, University of Kassel.
Marschark, M. (1993). Psychological development of dear children. New York: Oxford University Press.
Mayer-Johnson, R. (1984). The picture communication symbols. Solana Beach, CA: Mayer-Johnson.
Mayer-Johnson, R. (1985). The picture communication symbols-Book II. Solana Beach, CA: Mayer-Johnson.
Nagle, R. J., & Campbell, L. H. (1998). Cerebral palsy. In L. Phelps (Ed.), Health related disorders in children and adolescents (pp. 145–153). Washington, DC: APA Books.
National Center for Health Statistics (1994). Data from the national health interview survey. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
Pierce, P. L., & McWilliam, P. J. (1993). Emerging literacy and children with severe speech and physical impairments (SSPI): Issues and possible intervention strategies. Topics in Language Disorders, 13(2), 47–57.
Reid, D. K., Hresko, W. P., Hammill, D. D., & Wiltshire, S. (1991). Test of Early Reading Ability-Deaf of Hard of Hearing (TERA-D/HH): Examiner’s manual. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
Reiman, J., & Bullis, M. (1993). Transition competence battery for deaf adolescents and young adults. Santa Monica, CA: James Stanfield.
Salvia, J., & Ysseldyke, J. E. (1998). Assessment (7th ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Sandberg, A. D. (1998). Reading and spelling among nonvocal children with cerebral palsy: Influence of home and school literacy environment. Reading and writing: An interdisci-plinary journal, 10,23–50.
Sandberg, A. D., & Hjelmquist, E. (1996). Phonologic awareness an literacy abilities in nonspeaking preschool children with cerebral palsy. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 12(3),pp. 138–153.
Sappington, J., Reedy, S., Welch, R., & Hamilton, J. (1989). Validity of messages from quadriplegic persons with cerebral palsy. American Journal of Mental Retardation,94(1), 49–52.
Schmelter-Davis, L. (1984). Vocational evaluation of handicapped college students: Hearing, motor, and visually impaired (ISBN 0–916855–01–5). Lincroft, NJ: Brookdale Community College (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 264 390).
Smith, A. K., Thurston, S., Light, J., Parnes, P., & O’Keefe, B. (1989). The form and use of written communication produced by physically disabled individuals using microcomputers. Augmentative and Alternative Communication,5(2), 115–124.
Traxler, C. B. (2000). The Stanford Achievement Test, 9th Edition: National norming and performance standards for deaf and hard-of-hearing students. Journal of Deaf Studiesrid Deaf Education, 5(4), 337–348
Weiner, E. (1980). Diagnostic evaluation of writing skills. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 13 48–53.
White, A., & Tischler, S. (1999). Receptive sign vocabulary tests: Tests of single word vocabulary or iconicity? American Annals of the Deaf 144(4), 334–338.
Yoshinaga-Itano, C., & Downey, D. M. (1996). The psychoeducational characteristics of school-aged students in Colorado with educationally significant hearing losses. Volta Review, 98(1), 65–96.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2003 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Frisby, C.L. (2003). Nonverbal Assessment of Academic Achievement with Special Populations. In: McCallum, R.S. (eds) Handbook of Nonverbal Assessment. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0153-4_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0153-4_12
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-4945-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-0153-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive