Abstract
Classical mechanics is known often to offer a good description of molecular dynamical processes and hence this approach is widely used to simulate the dynamics of molecular systems. Classical mechanics allows for simulation of large systems. Large means in this connection systems consisting of several thousands of atoms or molecules. The reason for this is that the computational effort in classical dynamics scales about linearly with the size of the system, i.e. with the number of atoms N. Hence, within the classical mechanical description it is therefore possible to simulate phenomena as for instance protein folding or phase transitions. However, for a number of dynamical processes the classical mechanical description appears to be insufficient. In general this is so for what could be called “rare events”, i.e. processes which have probabilities of the order 10−3 or smaller. Such processes could for instance be reactions where a barrier has to be tunneled through or state resolved vibrational or electronic transitions which are classically forbidden. By classically forbidden we understand processes which for dynamical reasons do not occur in classical mechanics. Thus, for a large class of problems involving for instance chemical reactions with activation barrier, vibrational and electronic transitions we will have to use the correct description, namely the quantum description. However, the quantum mechanical approach has the problem that the computationally effort scales exponentially as 103N, i.e. even today problems with N=3~4 (three to four atoms) can only be solved “exactly” if one or more of the atoms are hydrogen atoms.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
G.D. Billing, The quantum-classical theory, Oxford University Press, New York 2002.
Feynmann, R. P., and Hibbs, A. R., 1965, Quantum Mechanics and Path Integrals, McGraw Hill, New York.
Pechukas, P., 1969, Phys. Rev. 181; 166-173, 174.
Miller, W.H., 1970, J. Chem. Phys. 53, 1949, 3578.
Marcus, R. A., 1970, Chem. Phys. Lett. 7, 525.
van Vleck, J. H., 1928, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 14, 178-188.
Herman, M. F., and Kluk, E., 1984, Chem. Phys. 91, 27-34.
Miller, W. H., 1991, J. Chem. Phys. 95, 9428.
Lebedeff, S. A., 1968,Phys. Rev. 165, 1399.
Heller, E. J., 1975, J. Chem. Phys. 62, 1544-1555
Heller, E. J., 1975, J. Chem. Phys. 1976, 64, 63; 1977, 66, 5777.
Sawada, S. I., Heather, R., Jackson, B., and Metiu, H.; 1985, J. Chem. Phys. 83, 3009.
Martinez, T. J., Ben-Nun, M.; and Levine, R. D., 1996, J. Phys. Chem. 100, 7884.
Child, M. S., 1974, Molecular Collision Theory”, Academic Press, London; 1991, Semiclassical Mechanics with Molecular Applications, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Manz, J., 1997, in Femtochemistry and Femtobiology: Ultrafast Reaction Dynamics at Atomic- Scale Resolution, Ed. V. Sundstöm, Imperial College Press, London, pp.80-318.
Kay, K. G., 1997, J. Chem. Phys., 107, 2313-2328.
Adhikari S., and Billing, G. D., 2000, J. Chem. Phys. 113, 1409-1414
Billing, G. D., and Adhikari, S., 2000, Chem. Phys. Lett. 321, 197-204.
Billing, G. D., 2001, Chem. Phys. Lett. 343, 130-138.
Billing, G. D., 2001, J. Chem. Phys. 114, 6641-6653; 2001
Billing, G. D., 2001 Int. J. Quant. Chem. 84, 467-478.
Billing, G. D., 2001, Chem. Phys. 264, 71-80.
Billing, G. D., 2001, J. Chem. Phys. 105, 2340-2347.
Billing, G. D., 1997, J. Chem. Phys. 107, 4286-4294.
Billing, G. D., 1999, J. Chem. Phys. lll, 48-53.
See for instance Coalson, R. D., and Karplus, M., 1982, Chem. Phys. Lett. 90, 301-305
Meyer, H.-D., 1981, Chem. Phys. 61, 335;
Kay, K. G., 1992, Phys. Rev. A 46, 1213-1232;
Møller, K. B., and Henriksen N. E., 1996, J. Chem. Phys.105 5037-5047.
Bohm, D., 1952,, Phys. Rev. 85, 166-179; ibid. 180-193.
Billing, G. D., 2000, J. Mol. Structure (Theochem), 501-502, 519-528; 2001
Billing, G. D., 2000, Phys. Chem. Chem.. Phys. 1, 4687-4694.
Billing, G. D., 2000, Quantum Classical Methods, in Lecture Notes, Eds. Lagana, A.; Riganelli, A. Springer Verlag; Berlin.
See e.g. Cullum, J. K., and Willoughby, R. A., 1985, Lanczos Algorithms for large Symmetrix Eigenvalue Computations, Birkhaüser, Boston.
Park, T. J., and Light, J. C., 1986, J. Chem. Phys. 85, 5870-5876.
Billing, G. D., and Mikkelsen, K. V., 1997, Advanced Molecular Dynamics and Chemical Kinetics, Wiley; New York.
Billing, G. D. unpublished results.
Coletti, C., and Billing, G. D. to be published.
Billing, G. D., 2001, Chem. Phys. Lett. 339, 237-242.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2002 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Billing, G.D. (2002). Quantum-dressed Classical Mechanics. In: Mohan, M. (eds) Current Developments in Atomic, Molecular, and Chemical Physics with Applications. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0115-2_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0115-2_14
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-4930-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-0115-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive