Skip to main content

Writing a Literature Review

  • Chapter
The Portable Mentor

Abstract

Literature reviews occupy an important corner of the world of scientific activity, yet most scientists do not receive training in how to write them. In the early days of psychological research, many people did their research based on intuitions and personal insights, and one did not have to spend much time in background reading simply because there was not much to read. As our field’s knowledge base expands month by month, however, it becomes increasingly important to be able to master the amount of information already published. New ideas increasingly have to build on previously published works.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Archer, J. (2000). Sex differences in aggression between heterosexual partners: A meta-analytic review. PsychologicalBulletin, 126, 651–680.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumeister, R. F. (1990). Suicide as escape from self. Psychological Review, 97, 90–113.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baumeister, R. F. (2000). Gender differences in erotic plasticity: The female sex drive as socially flexible and responsive. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 347–374.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baumeister, R. F., Catanese, K. R., & Vohs, K. D. (2001). Is there a gender difference in strength of sex drive?Theoretical views, conceptual distinctions, and a review of relevant evidence. Personality and Social PsychologyReview, (in press, to appear shortly.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamentalhuman motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497–529.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1997). Writing narrative literature reviews. Review of General Psychology, 1,311–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bem, D. J. (1995). Writing a review article for Psychological Bulletin. Psychological Bulletin, 118, 172–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1977). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, H. (1990). Meta-analysis and the integrative research review. In C. Hendrick, & M. Clark (Eds.), Researchmethods in personality and social psychology (p. 142–163). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, H., & Hedges, L.V. (1994). The handbook of research synthesis. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darley, J. M., & Gross, P. (1983). A hypothesis-confirming bias in labeling effects. Journal of Personality and SocialPsychology, 44, 20–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DePaulo, B. M., Chariton, K., Cooper, H., Lindsay, J. J., & Muhlenbruck, L. (1997). The accuracy-confidence correlation in the detection of deception. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1, 346–357.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, N. L. (1998). HARKing: Hypothesizing after the results are known. Personality and Social Psychology Review,2, 196–217.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kunda, Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 480–498.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lord, C. G., Ross, L., & Lepper, M. R. (1979). Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: The effects ofprior theories on subsequently considered evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 2098–2109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, M. B., & Hyde, J. S. (1993). Gender differences in sexuality: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 114,29–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, R. (1983) Assessing the statistical and social importance of the effects of psychotherapy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 51, 4–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, R. (1991). Meta-analytic procedures for social research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J. (1991). Editorial. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 3–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, F. M. (1986). Meta-analysis: Quantitative methods for research synthesis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Baumeister, R.F. (2003). Writing a Literature Review. In: Prinstein, M.J., Patterson, M.D. (eds) The Portable Mentor. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0099-5_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0099-5_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-4923-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-0099-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics