Writing a Literature Review
Literature reviews occupy an important corner of the world of scientific activity, yet most scientists do not receive training in how to write them. In the early days of psychological research, many people did their research based on intuitions and personal insights, and one did not have to spend much time in background reading simply because there was not much to read. As our field’s knowledge base expands month by month, however, it becomes increasingly important to be able to master the amount of information already published. New ideas increasingly have to build on previously published works.
KeywordsNarrative Review Null Result Null Finding Broad Question Good Guess
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Archer, J. (2000). Sex differences in aggression between heterosexual partners: A meta-analytic review. PsychologicalBulletin, 126, 651–680.Google Scholar
- Baumeister, R. F., Catanese, K. R., & Vohs, K. D. (2001). Is there a gender difference in strength of sex drive?Theoretical views, conceptual distinctions, and a review of relevant evidence. Personality and Social PsychologyReview, (in press, to appear shortly.)Google Scholar
- Cohen, J. (1977). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Cooper, H. (1990). Meta-analysis and the integrative research review. In C. Hendrick, & M. Clark (Eds.), Researchmethods in personality and social psychology (p. 142–163). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Cooper, H., & Hedges, L.V. (1994). The handbook of research synthesis. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
- Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Rosenthal, R. (1991). Meta-analytic procedures for social research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Wolf, F. M. (1986). Meta-analysis: Quantitative methods for research synthesis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar